From a study conducted on a 1-ha plot at the Ayer Hitam Forest, Selangor, a total of 177 species in 92 genera

and 44 families were enumerated. The stand density was 909 trees per ha. Stumpage values for below cutting

limit were RM 8707.52 and RM 17514.12 per hafor upper cutting limit. The total stumpage value was RM

26221.64 per ha. The family Sapotaceae contributed the highest stumpage value accounting for half the total

stumpage value obtained. The commercial groups nyatoh and kedondong accounted for 52% and 25% of the

total stumpage value, respectively

Abd. Ghani, Awang Noor

Ibrahim, Faridah Hanum

P., Pius

Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository

PertanikaJ. Trap. Agric. Sci. 22(2): 167 - 170 (1999) ISSN: 1511-3701© Universiti Putra Malaysia PressEconomic Valuation of Tree Species Diversity at Ayer Hitam Forest,Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia1. FARlDAH HANUM, P. PIUS and AWANG OOR ABD. GHANIFaculty of ForestryUniversiti Putra Malaysia43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, MalaysiaKeywords: Tree species diversity, I-ha plot, economic valuation, stumpage value, Ayer Hitam ForestABSTRAKDaripada satu kajian di plot 1-ha di Hutan Ayer Hitam, Selangor, sejumlah 177 spesies yang terangkum dalam92 genus dan 44 famili telah dikira. Ketumpatan dirian ialah 909 pokok setiap ha. Nilai stumpej bagi hadtebangan bawah ialah RM 8707.52 dan had tebangan atas ialah RM 1 7514.12 setiap ha. Jumlah nilaistumpej ialah RM 26221.64 setiap ha. Famili Sapotaceae memberikan nilai stumpej tertinggi dan merupakanseparuh dari jumlah nilai stumpej yang diperolehi. Kumpulan komersial nyatoh memberikan 52% manakalakedondong memberikan 25 % dari jumlah nilai stumpej.ABSTRACTFrom a study conducted on a 1-ha plot at the Ayer Hitam Forest, Selangor, a total of 177 species in 92 generaand 44 families were enumerated. The stand density was 909 trees per ha. Stumpage values for below cuttinglimit were RM 8707.52 and RM 17514.12 per hafor upper cutting limit. The total stumpage value was RM26221.64 per ha. The family Sapotaceae contributed the highest stumpage value accounting for half the totalstumpage value obtained. The commercial groups nyatoh and kedondong accounted for 52% and 25 % of thetotal stumpage value, respectively.INTRODUCTIONThe economic potential of species diversityhas not been fully investigated (IUe ,1987).To ensure that the components of biodiversityare utilised in a sustainable manner for thecontinued progress and socio-economicdevelopment of the nation, the revisedMalaysian ational Forestry Policy 1993emphasized the importance of conservationand valuation of biological resources to theeconomy of Malaysia.This study is part of an on-going project onthe economic valuation of forest goods andservices funded by the Malaysian Governmentthrough its IRPA grant. Before any reasonablevalue can be put on a forest in monetory terms,we believe that the diversity on the forest mustbe well studied. The question we hope to answerhere is whether knowing the detail compositionof tree species can give a better estimate on theeconomic value of a forest? In doing so we usedthe stumpage value i.e. the value of standingtree at the stump as a measure of economicvalue of tree species diversity.METHODOLOGYThe study area was located in Compartment6/9 of Ayer Hitam Forest, Puchong, Selangor(3° 4' 101° 41 'E), which was now excised fora housing project (Lestari Perdana). Thedetails of this forest is given in Faridah Hanum(1999). A I-ha (100 xl00m) study plot wasestablished at altitude 50 metres a.s.l. Theplot was further divided into contiguous 10mx 10m sub-plots. All trees > 5 em at diameterbreast height (dbh) were tagged, labelled,measured and identified from all the sub-plots. Stumpage values were obtained bymodifying the formula of Davis (1966) toindicate the differences in species and diameterclass and is shown below:I. FARIDAH HANUM, I., P. PIUS and AWANG NOOR ABD. GHANIS..IJS..IJy.1Jp ..IJCy. (p.. - C - PM) where,IJ IJStumpage value for each species anddiameter class (RM/m3)Volume of timber for each speciesand diameter class (m3)Log price for each species at millgate and diameter class (RM/m3 )Average logging cost per cubic meter(RM/m3 )PM = Profit margin (RM/m3 )an index for each species(i = 1,2,3, , n)j an index for diameter class(j = 1,2,3, , k)The volume formula adopted here was the oneused widely by the Selangor State Forestry De-partment, Malaysia which is as follows:y = {po x (dbh)2 x h x F} 1 {4 x 10000} where:1 1V = Volume of timber of each tree (m3)Pi = 22/7dbh = diameter at breast height (cm)h = merchantable tree height (m)F (0.65) form factoran index for individual trees(1,2,3, n)The profit margin PM was calculated using thefollowing formula:PM = (p.. x PR) 1 (1 + PR) where,1JPM.. = Profit marginIJ . L' h ' 'IIP ij = Log pnce lor eac speCIes at mlgate and diameter classPR = Profit Ratio= an index for each species(i = 1,2,3, ......n)j = an index for diameter class(j = 1,2,3, ...... k)The log prices at mill gate were obtainedfrom Maskayu (1996), price reduction factor,average logging and transportation costs fromAwang Noor and Mohd. Shahwahid (1995). Thetotal stumpage was finally calculated by summingup all the stumpage values for each species anddiameter class in the study area.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThere were 177 tree species belonging to 92genera and 44 families per ha from this forest, astand density of 909 stems per ha and 67% oftrees were under 15 cm at diameter breast height(Faridah Hanum and Pius 1997). Since theavailability of present stumpage values on specieswas limited to trees with diameter at breastheights of 15 cm and above, only 33% of thetrees were assigned stumpage values. Table 1summarizes the stumpage values contributed bythe diversity of tree species from various families.Stumpage values for trees below cutting limit«15 cm dbh) was RM 8707.52 and above cuttinglimit (> 15 cm dbh) RM 17514.12 per ha,respectively. The total stumpage value for alltrees below and above cutting limits was RM26221.64 per ha (Table 1). Sapotaceaecontributed to almost half this total stumpagevalue, followed by Burseraceae (Table 1). Nyatohand Kedondong were the two species groupsthat contributed the most to the total stumpagevalue, with the former amounting to RM 13681.52and the latter amounting to RM 6366.13 (Table2) . The percentage distribution of trees bycommercial group showed that more than 95%are non-dipterocarps (Table 3). Among the non-dipterocarps, the light hardwood groupcontributed 25% of the total percentagedistribution followed by medium and heavyhardwood which accounted for 23% and 18%,respectively (Table 3). The contribution ofdipterocarps to the stumpage value is very smallas only 4% (Table 3) were recorded from thisplot and they were all below cutting limitamounting to RM 2021.99 as shown earlier inTable 1. early 70% of the total stumpage valuewas derived from trees in diameter class> 45 cmdbh (Table 4).The total stumpage value obtained fromthis study was higher, almost doubled thatobtained by Timin (1997) from a similar studyin the same compartment which was RM14,500.36 per ha. The difference in these valuescan only be explained by the different methodsemployed in sampling the area. In the presentstudy, a 100% sampling of trees> 5 cm dbh wasemployed but only 10% sampling was undertakenby Timin (1997). The values obtained from thepresent study showed a similar trend with thoseobtained from Ulu Muda Forest Reserve, a hillforest in the northern part of Peninsular Malaysia(Faridah Hanum et al. 1999, Awang Noor andMohd. Shahwahid 1995). A higher speciesdiversity does not necessarily mean a highereconomic value of the forest. This was proven in168 PERTANlKAJ. TROP. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 22 0.2,1999ECO OMIC VALUATIO OF TREE SPECIES DIVERSITY AT AYER HITAM FOREST, SELANGORTABLE 1Stumpage value by family in 1-ha plotFamily Stumpage value (RM) Total stumpage(RM)Below cut Upper cutSAPOTACEAE 3070.26 9988.19 13058.45BURSERACEAE 1084.27 5281.86 6366.13DIPTEROCARPACEAE 2021.99 2021.99MYRTACEAE 370.97 1416.20 1787.17MELASTOMATACEAE 64.77 557.40 622.17FLACOURTIACEAE 543.69 543.69EUPHORBIACEAE 76.31 270.47 346.78GUITIFERAE 290.55 290.55STERCULIACEAE 252.20 252.20LAURACEAE 185.49 185.49EBE ACEAE 128.65 128.65ANACARDIACEAE 90.24 90.24LEGUMI OSAE 88.11 88.11RUBIACEAE 85.47 85.47MYRISTICACEAE 75.29 75.29SAPI DACEAE 73.21 73.21FAGACEAE 70.97 70.97VERBENACEAE 21.98 21.98RHIZOPHORACEAE 17.17 17.17BOMBACACEAE 16.23 16.23ELAEOCARPACEAE 15.06 15.06THYMELAEACEAE 12.90 12.90MORACEAE 10.69 10.69CORNACEAE 8.89 8.89OLACACEAE 8.32 8.32POLYGALACEAE 6.35 6.35AN 0 ACEAE 4.91 4.91THEACEAE 4.43 4.43MELIACEAE 4.33 4.33ULMACEAE 3.82 3.82RM 8,707.52 RM 17,514.12 RM 26,221.64TABLE 2Stumpage value by species group in 1-ha plotSpecies Stumpage value (RM) Total stumpage alue (RM) Percentage total stumpageGroup * value (%)Below cut Upper cutNY 3070.26 10611.27 13681.52 52KDD 1084.27 5281.86 6366.13 25LRM 2021.99 2021.99 8OMHW 911.46 513.21 1424.67 5OHHW 843.33 557.40 1400.74 5OLHW 524.09 550.38 1074.46 4KS 252.52 252.52 18707.52 17514.12 26221.64 100* NY = yatoh; KDD = Kedondong; LRM = Light Red Meranti; OMHW = OtherMedium Hardwood; OHHW = Other Hard Hardwood; OLHW = Other LightHardwood; KS = Kembang SemangkukPERTANIKAJ. TRap. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 22 0.2,1999 169I. FARIDAH HANUM, I., P. PIUS and AWANG OaR ABD. GHANITABLE 3Percentage distribution of trees bycommercial groupCONCLUSIONThere is no doubt that many a time the forest isunder estimated in its economic value because* DIPT = Dipterocarp; 0 -DIPT = Non-Dipterocarp;** Y = yatoh; KDD = Kedondong; LRM = LightRed Meranti;OMHW = Other Medium Hardwood;OHHW = Other Hard Hardwood; OLHW =Other Light Hardwood; KS = KembangSemangkukBelow cut Upper cut> 60.0 10807.44 10807.4455.9 - 50.0 5148.48 5148.4849.9 - 45.0 778.95 1558.20 2337.1544.9 - 33.0 5611.35 5611.3532.9 - 25.0 1368.26 1368.2624.9 - 15.0 948.15 948.15RM 8707.52 RM 17514.12 RM 26221.64of the constraint taken in sampling and thehigh costs incurred, amongst others. However,should the government intend to increase itsnet revenue from the forest, it is recommendedthat a detail study on the species compositionbe made.MAsKAYU. 1966. Malaysian Timber Industrial Board(MTIB), Kuala Lumpur.TIMI~, J.G. 1997. Valuation lof stumpage in AirHitam Forest Reserve, Puchong, Selangor. B.Se.Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors would like to thank Ibrahim EdhamMohidin for the assistance provided in the fieldduring the course of this study. Financial supportwas obtained from the University Seed Money50204-97-06, IRPA 01-02-04-0183 and IRPA 08-02-04-0089 for which we are grateful.REFERENCESAw G OOR ABo GHANI and MOHO. SHAWAHID HJ.OTHMAN. 1995. Estimation of stumpage valuesin three concession compartments of UluMuda/Pedu watershed area. Paper presentedin Bengkel 1, K~ian Kesan PembalakanTerhadap Waduk di Hutan Simpan DIu Muda,Baling, Kedah, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.12 p.DAVIS, K.P. 1966. Forest Management: Regulation andValuation. 2nd ed. NewYork: McGraw Hill BookCo. Ine. 519p.FARIOAH RANUM, 1. and P. PIUS. 1997. Speciescomposition of Ayer Hitam Forest Reserve,Puchong, Selangor. Paper presented at theSecond Workshop on Ecology and Manage-ment of Hutan Simpan Kekal Bangi. UKMBangi, 22-23 ovember 1997. 11 p.FARIOAH RANUM, 1., Miskon Simin and Awang oorAbdul Ghani. 1999. Tree species diversity andeconomic value of a watershed forest in UluMuda Forest Reserve, Kedah. PertanikaJ. TropAgrie. Sci. 22(1): 63-68.FARIOAH RANUM, 1. 1999. Plant diversity and con-servation value of Ayer Hitam Forest, Selangor,Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika Journal TropicalAgricultural Science 22 (2): 73-83.IUCN. 1987. Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide andStrategy for Their Conservation. Richmond: IUCNThreatened Plants Unit.Total stumpagevalue (RM)Stumpagevalue (RM)TABLE 4Stumpage values by dbh classCommercial * Specie ** Percentage (%)group groupDIPT LRM 4NO -DIPT KDD 14NO -DIPT NY 14o -DIPT OLHW 25ON-DIPT OMHW 23NON-DIPT OHHW 18NON-DIPT KS 2Dbh class(cm)an earlier study in Ulu Muda Forest Reservewhere there were only 77 species per ha but thetotal stumpage value was RM 41445.30 per ha.The next question asked is whether speciesdiversity studies will be necessary to improve theeconomic value of a forest? Present evidenceundoubtedly gives the following answers viz., itwill help place the species in the correctcommercial group, thus the right pricing whichwould not over estimate or under estimate theeconomic value of the forest, it will tell thestocking of the forest, and also shows which dbhclasses and commercial species group arecontributing the most stumpage.170 PERTANIKAJ. TROP. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 22 0.2,1999

Economic Valuation of Tree Species Diversity at Ayer Hitam Forest,

Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia

http://psasir.upm.edu.my/3758/1/Economic_Valuation_of_Tree_Species_Diversity_at_Ayer_Hitam_Forest.pdf

Economic Valuation of Tree Species Diversity at Ayer Hitam Forest, Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository