The Accuracy of Saccadic and Perceptual Decisions in Visual Search

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements during search for a target embedded in noise are suboptimally guided by information about target location (Eckstein et al, 1997, paper presented at ARVO). Our goal was to compare the spatial information used to guide the saccades with that used for the perceptual decision. Three observers were asked to determine the location of a bright disk (diameter 21 min arc) in white noise (signal-to-noise ratio 4.2) from among ten possible locations evenly spaced at 5.9 deg eccentricity. In the first of four conditions, observers used natural eye movements. In the three remaining conditions, observers fixated a central cross at all times. The fixation conditions consisted of three different presentation times (100, 200, 300 ms), each followed by a mask. Eye-position data were collected with a resolution of ∼0.2 deg. In the natural viewing condition, we measured the accuracy with respect to the target and the latency of the first saccade. In the fixation conditions, we discarded trials in which observers broke fixation. Perceptual performance was computed for all conditions. Averaged across observers, the first saccade was correct (closest to the target location) for 56±7 (SD) % of trials (chance 10%) and occurred after a latency of 313±56 ms. Perceptual performance averaged 53±4%, 63±4%, 65±2% correct at 100, 200, and 300 ms, respectively. We conclude that, for the signal-to-noise ratio used, at the time of initiation of the first saccade there is little difference between the amount of information about target location available to the perceptual and saccadic systems. </jats:p