CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Does the permeability of gravel river beds affect near-bed hydrodynamics?
Authors
Annie Ockleford (7645850)
D. Mark Powell (7190879)
James R. Cooper (7192526)
Stephen P. Rice (7146839)
Publication date
1 January 2017
Publisher
Doi
Abstract
The permeability of river beds is an important control on hyporheic flow and the movement of fine sediment and solutes into and out of the bed. However, relatively little is known about the effect of bed permeability on overlying near-bed flow dynamics, and thus on fluid advection at the sediment–water interface. This study provides the first quantification of this effect for water-worked gravel beds. Laboratory experiments in a recirculating flume revealed that flows over permeable beds exhibit fundamental differences compared with flows over impermeable beds of the same topography. The turbulence over permeable beds is less intense, more organised and more efficient at momentum transfer because eddies are more coherent. Furthermore, turbulent kinetic energy is lower, meaning that less energy is extracted from the mean flow by this turbulence. Consequently, the double-averaged velocity is higher and the bulk flow resistance is lower over permeable beds, and there is a difference in how momentum is conveyed from the overlying flow to the bed surface. The main implications of these results are three-fold. First, local pressure gradients, and therefore rates of material transport, across the sediment–water interface are likely to differ between impermeable and permeable beds. Second, near-bed and hyporheic flows are unlikely to be adequately predicted by numerical models that represent the bed as an impermeable boundary. Third, more sophisticated flow resistance models are required for coarse-grained rivers that consider not only the bed surface but also the underlying permeable structure. Overall, our results suggest that the effects of bed permeability have critical implications for hyporheic exchange, fluvial sediment dynamics and benthic habitat availability. © 2017 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Loughborough University Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:figshare.com:article/94843...
Last time updated on 26/03/2020
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1002%2Fesp.4260
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
University of Brighton Research Portal
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pure.atira.dk:publications...
Last time updated on 14/03/2019
University of Brighton Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eprints.brighton.ac.uk:174...
Last time updated on 21/11/2017
Leicester Research Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:figshare.com:article/10217...
Last time updated on 13/05/2020