Osnat Akirav summarises a journal article which examines the ability of legislators to get re-elected by their fulfilling their three roles: legislation, oversight and representation. She also re-examines the claim that most legislators are motivated by a desire to be re-elected, and that this desire determines the utility of their legislative activity toward this end by advertising, credit claiming and position taking. She further argues that different skills are required to be selected as a party’s choice and be re-elected, and to enact legislation. Thus, she distinguishes between two types of legislators—those who are electable and those who are successful in the legislature

Akirav, Osnat

LSE Research Online

democraticaudit.com http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=7500By Democratic Audit UKThe skills needed to be re-elected are different to those neededto be an effective legislatorOsnat Akirav  summarises a journal article which examines the ability of legislators to get re-elected by theirfulfilling their three roles: legislation, oversight and representation. She also re-examines the claim that mostlegislators are motivated by a desire to be re-elected, and that this desire determines the utility of their legislativeactivity toward this end by advertising, credit claiming and position taking. She further argues that different skillsare required to be selected as a party’s choice and be re-elected, and to enact legislation. Thus, she distinguishesbetween two types of legislators—those who are electable and those who are successful in the legislature.The Israeli Knesset (Credit: Photo Gallery Israeli Ministry of Tourism, CC BY SA 2.0 )Re-election rates have important consequences for the quality of a democracy. Studies found that differentcandidate selection methods create different behaviours among legislators. Legislators have to raise their ownmoney to lobby for selection by their parties, they try to attract the media through populist issues, they connectwith their constituents more intensely, and they become more independent and more oriented toward individualconcerns.Having overcome the first hurdle of being selected by one’s party, there are several factors determine whether alegislator seeking re-election will win; incumbency – political incumbents across systems enjoy a privilegedposition within their own districts in terms of their visibility, name recognition, and their ability to garner votes byproviding services to constituents.A second factor offered in the literature focuses on the electoral system. Studies show how different electoralsystems provide different incentives to politicians, thereby creating different kinds of connections between votersand legislators.The dominant normative claim is that electoral competition is good for democracy because itpromotes representation and responsiveness.The two-stage election process requires legislators to focus on two separate constituencies: the primaryconstituency and the general election constituency. The primary constituency is the party base, a small subset ofvoters that are generally more ideological than the more moderate general election constituency. Thus, balancingthese interests might prove difficult for legislators. Some electoral systems strengthen the power of the individual,some the power of the parties and some try to balance the power of the individual and the power of the party.The third explanation is about effectiveness. The basic assumption behind this factor is that active legislators whoare considered to be effective in their roles will gain the voters’ support.The fourth explanation involves charismatic communication skills, which defined as the actor’s demonstratedskills, performance and talent that are pertinent to the main arena in which she/he operates. In an era of masscommunication that demands attention both from the voters and from legislators, having communications skills isan essential factor for legislators’ success and their ability to be re-elected.While communication skills are important, the increasing use of new communication technologies is a prerequisitefor directly targeting voters. Such technologies bypass the mass media as well as the party organizations. Hence,the fifth and last explanation revolves around the information revolution, which has accelerated since the inventionof the Internet and has an enormous effect on public life. Through the Internet, legislators and parties becametransparent and accessible to the public. Information about the legislators’ performance is available on thewebsites of the parliament and the personal websites of the legislators, and on their Facebook pages. In addition,the new technology makes direct contact between legislators and their constituents simple. Furthermore, partiesuse their websites during the election period to address the public directly.Thus, the explanations about the factors affecting the probability of re-election have changed over the timebecause of changes in candidate selection methods, in the electoral systems, in mass communications and in thetechnology. Each factor, separately and together, has changed the rules of the political game. Therefore, it isimportant to examine traditional claims in this area with fresh new data about their existence or relevancy.The study suggests a model for examining legislators’ performance by expanding the definition of legislators’productivity to include the use of the formal tools available to legislators in a specific parliament. Activities definedas formal if they are based on the procedures of the legislatures. Hence, the model includes the use of four tools—legislation, motions for the agenda, parliamentary questions and one-minute speeches.Table 1: Productivity ModelTable 1 presents the content of the productivity model. The model combines several tools available to legislatorsin the Israeli parliament (the Knesset). The table indicates their primary purposes, their degree of significance andthe weight they have in the model. The model uses a scale from 0 to 100 to measure legislators’ productivity.The data gathered is from the 14th Knesset (1996-1999) regarding legislators’ formal activities and their re-election to the 15th Knesset. The same kind of data was gathered for legislators from the 16th Knesset (2003-2006).In order to examine the research hypothesis; the skills needed to be re-elected are different from the skills neededto fulfil the legislators’ roles, we ran a logistic regression for the 14th Knesset with the dependent variable beingre-election and four independent variables: productivity, gender, seniority and membership in thecoalition/opposition. There were 68 relevant legislators, of whom 10 were not re-elected and 58 were re-elected.None of the independent variables were found to be significant. Hence, in order to be re-elected a legislator doesnot need to be productive. Instead, legislators need other skills.Evidence from previous studies is inconclusive about whether active legislators who are considered to be effectivein their roles will gain the voters’ support in their re-election efforts. Some have established such aconnection while much of the scholarship about legislative representation in at least the U.S.A. makes exactly thecase that other skills, or at least constituent-oriented activity outside the formal sphere, can make an electoraldifference and that legislators therefore invest in it.In their book ‘The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence, Bruce Cain, John Ferejohn,and Morris Fiorina describe the behaviour of representatives in the United States and Great Britain and theresponse of their constituents as well. They showed how congressmen and members of Parliament earnpersonalized support and how this attenuates their ties to national leaders and parties. Fiorina found that theincumbency advantage ascended mostly because of the dramatic increased of the “Casework Style” ofrepresentation. And few years later he found that everyone started using the Casework Style, hence, a high levelof constituency service became the norm and was expected by the voters.There is substantial variation in what legislators claim credit for and how often they claim credit for expendituresmade for their districts. Our findings for the 14th Knesset accord with the latter. Hence, we need to look for otherexplanations, other skills that help legislators get re-elected. In addition, re-election seems to be unrelated towhether the MK is male or female, a member of the coalition or the opposition, or a senior member or juniormember.For the 16th Knesset, we ran a logistic regression with re-election as the dependent variable and threeindependent variables: productivity, gender and seniority. In the 16th Knesset, senior legislators were 4.7 timesmore likely to be re-elected than junior legislators. This finding is consistent with previous studies demonstratingthat senior incumbents are re-elected time after time. We did not find any significant difference in the productivityof junior MKs and senior MKs. Therefore, in the 16th Knesset, which was less productive than the 14th Knesset,incumbency was more significant than productivity.The gender variable was almost significant considering the fact that there were 9 women and 61 men. Men weremore likely to be re-elected. Several scholars have looked at the role of gender in parliaments. All of them foundthat female politicians bolster the position of women’s interests and that female politicians invest much more effortthan male politicians in order to justify their presence in parliament. Nevertheless, we found no significantdifference in the productivity of male and female MKs. Again, the ability to be re-elected seems to have more to dowith being a member of the male elite than about being productive.It seems as if the skills needed to be re-elected are different from the skills needed to fulfill the legislators’ roles oflegislation, oversight and representation. In this respect we can identify two types of legislators–the “electable”type and the “legislative activity” type. Legislators seem to have a hard time being both. David Mayhew hasclaimed that most legislators are motivated by a desire to be re-elected, and that this desire motivates theiractivity toward this end by advertising, credit claiming and position taking.However, the reality when Mayhew presented his electoral connection claim is significantly different from thereality of the last two decades. There have been changes in almost the entire traditional political environmentincluding in the candidate selection methods, the electoral systems, mass communications and technology, eachof which separately and taken together have changed the rules of the political game. Thus, working in thelegislature is just one of the factors but no longer sufficient for being re-elected.Using fresh data, we examined the traditional claims about the factors that lead to a legislator’s re-election. Wefound that while some still matter, others are less relevant than they were in the past. We argue that different skillsare required for different roles. If a legislator wants to be re-elected, he/she needs to understand that there is oneset of skills to use for getting elected such as charismatic communication skills, the awareness and the ability touse new technologies to communicate with the voters, and the investment of time in informal activities. It takes adifferent set of skills to use to fulfil the role of legislator. Dror, in a 2011 book, counsels leaders to surroundthemselves with professional staff who will help them fulfil their roles. The same insight may be relevant tolegislators. In order to get re-elected, choose a professional staff with skills in this area. After being elected,choose a professional staff that will help you to enact legislate, oversee the government and represent yourconstituency.The lack of a relationship between legislative productivity and re-election has major implications for both thepolitical process in democracies and candidates. We must ask ourselves whether the format in which candidatescurrently campaign for re-election really results in the election of those who are best qualified to do the job oflegislators. If we conclude that the skills needed to be re-elected are not congruent with those needed to be aproductive legislator, then the answer may be “no.” Furthermore, if there is no association between legislativeproductivity and re-election, what motivation does a legislator have to fulfil the role for which he or she waselected?Finally, from a practical point of view, those seeking re-election would do well to avail themselves of a professionalstaff who can help them develop the skills necessary to achieve this goal. Once in office, these legislators shouldconsider other advisers whose expertise lies in helping the legislator fulfil the role for which he or she was elected.—Note: for full academic references and data analysis, see the full article in the Government and Opposition journal.This piece represents the views of the author and not those of Democratic Audit or the LSE. Please read ourcomments policy before posting. —Osnat Akirav  is a senior lecturer in Political Science at the Western Galilee College, Israeland the head of the department of political science at the Western Galilee College. She holdsa PhD from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Her specialization is in legislative studies,setting the agenda, candidate selection methods, local government, gender and politics,minorities and politics, research methods and Israeli political system. She has numerouspublications on the representative behavior in local government and in parliaments. Sheserved 10 years as local council representative.

The skills needed to be re-elected are different to those needed to be an effective legislator

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LSE Research Online