research

Communication Complexity of Permutation-Invariant Functions

Abstract

Motivated by the quest for a broader understanding of communication complexity of simple functions, we introduce the class of "permutation-invariant" functions. A partial function f:{0,1}nΓ—{0,1}nβ†’{0,1,?}f:\{0,1\}^n \times \{0,1\}^n\to \{0,1,?\} is permutation-invariant if for every bijection Ο€:{1,…,n}β†’{1,…,n}\pi:\{1,\ldots,n\} \to \{1,\ldots,n\} and every x,y∈{0,1}n\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y} \in \{0,1\}^n, it is the case that f(x,y)=f(xΟ€,yΟ€)f(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) = f(\mathbf{x}^{\pi}, \mathbf{y}^{\pi}). Most of the commonly studied functions in communication complexity are permutation-invariant. For such functions, we present a simple complexity measure (computable in time polynomial in nn given an implicit description of ff) that describes their communication complexity up to polynomial factors and up to an additive error that is logarithmic in the input size. This gives a coarse taxonomy of the communication complexity of simple functions. Our work highlights the role of the well-known lower bounds of functions such as 'Set-Disjointness' and 'Indexing', while complementing them with the relatively lesser-known upper bounds for 'Gap-Inner-Product' (from the sketching literature) and 'Sparse-Gap-Inner-Product' (from the recent work of Canonne et al. [ITCS 2015]). We also present consequences to the study of communication complexity with imperfectly shared randomness where we show that for total permutation-invariant functions, imperfectly shared randomness results in only a polynomial blow-up in communication complexity after an additive O(log⁑log⁑n)O(\log \log n) overhead

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions