CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one anastomosis gastric bypass as rescue therapy after failed adjustable gastric banding: a multicenter comparative study
Authors
Amr I. al-Abbas
Claire E.E. de Vries
+12 more
Stefanie Devriendt
Anabela Guerra
Miguel Francisco Herrera
Jacques M. Himpens
Eva Pardina
Julia Peinado-Onsurbe
Juan Pujol-Rafols
Almino Cardoso Ramos
Rui José Da Silva Ribeiro
Bassem Y. Safadi
Hugo A. Sánchez-Aguilar
Bart Alexander van Wagensveld
Publication date
1 January 2018
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Background: To date, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding remains the third most commonly performed surgical procedure for weight loss. Some patients fail to get acceptable outcomes and undergo revisional surgery at rates ranging from 7% to 60%. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are among the most common salvage options for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Objective: To compare the outcomes of converting failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to RYGB, OAGB, or SG. Methods: Data collected from 7 experienced bariatric centers around the world were retrospectively collected, reviewed, and analyzed. Final body mass index (BMI), change in BMI, percentage excess BMI loss, and major complications with particular attention to leaks, hemorrhage, and mortality were reported. Results: Of 1219 patients analyzed, 74% underwent RYGB, 16% underwent OAGB, and 10% underwent SG after banding failure. The mean age was 38 years (±10 yr), and 82% of patients were women. The mean follow-up was 33 months. The follow-up rate was 100%, 87%, and 52% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. At the latest follow-up, percentage excess BMI loss >50% was achieved by 75% of RYGB, 85% of OAGB, and 67% of SG patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 13% of patients after RYGB, 5% after OAGB, and 15% after SG. Conclusion: Our data show that it is possible to achieve or maintain significant weight loss with an acceptable complication rate with all 3 surgical options. © 201
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
AUB ScholarWorks (American Univ. of Beirut)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:scholarworks.aub.edu.lb:10...
Last time updated on 16/04/2025