Let F be a family of graphs. In the F-Completion problem,
we are given a graph G and an integer k as input, and asked whether at most
k edges can be added to G so that the resulting graph does not contain a
graph from F as an induced subgraph. It appeared recently that special
cases of F-Completion, the problem of completing into a chordal graph
known as Minimum Fill-in, corresponding to the case of F={C4,C5,C6,…}, and the problem of completing into a split graph,
i.e., the case of F={C4,2K2,C5}, are solvable in parameterized
subexponential time 2O(klogk)nO(1). The exploration of this
phenomenon is the main motivation for our research on F-Completion.
In this paper we prove that completions into several well studied classes of
graphs without long induced cycles also admit parameterized subexponential time
algorithms by showing that:
- The problem Trivially Perfect Completion is solvable in parameterized
subexponential time 2O(klogk)nO(1), that is F-Completion for F={C4,P4}, a cycle and a path on four
vertices.
- The problems known in the literature as Pseudosplit Completion, the case
where F={2K2,C4}, and Threshold Completion, where F={2K2,P4,C4}, are also solvable in time 2O(klogk)nO(1).
We complement our algorithms for F-Completion with the following
lower bounds:
- For F={2K2}, F={C4}, F={P4}, and
F={2K2,P4}, F-Completion cannot be solved in time
2o(k)nO(1) unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails.
Our upper and lower bounds provide a complete picture of the subexponential
parameterized complexity of F-Completion problems for F⊆{2K2,C4,P4}.Comment: 32 pages, 16 figures, A preliminary version of this paper appeared in
the proceedings of STACS'1