The essay examines the ruling no. 65/2024 of the Constitutional Court, highlighting some critical issues surrounding the theoretical foundation of the so-called self- government of parliamentary bodies. In particular, the work briefly highlights the problematic consequences of an obiter dictum that concludes the ruling and that, by separating regulatory autonomy from self-government, ends up comprimising an adequate functional characterization of the regulatory reserve provided by art. 64 of the Constitution
