In this work, we improve the asymptotic formulae to describe the probability
distribution of a test statistic in G. Cowan \emph{et al.}'s
paper~\cite{asimov} from a perspective totally different from last version of
this arXiv entry. The starting point of this version seems more natural. The
probability distribution function under the hypothesis H is
f(Tμ​∣μH​)=∑n=0+∞​f(Tμ​∣n,μH​)P(n∣b+μH​s)=∑n=0nsmall​​f(Tμ​∣n,μH​)P(n∣b+μH​s)+∑n>nsmall​​f(Tμ​∣n,μH​)P(n∣b+μH​s)≈∑n=0nsmall​​fLS​(Tμ​∣n,μH​)P(n∣b+μH​s)+(1−∑n=0nsmall​​P(n∣b+μH​s))fLS​(Tμ​∣nsmall​,μH​)\.
Here P(n∣ν) is Poisson distribution function; nsmall​ is the
boarder between large statistics (LS) and small statistics (SS), and has to be
chosen appropriately. If the number of events is greater than
nsmall​, the probability distribution of Tμ​ is described by a
single function fLS​. fLS​ is basically the classic
asymptotic formulae with a correction. For each possible number of events not
greater than nsmall​, we obtain the probability distribution,
fSS​, based on a simplifed 6-bin distribution of the observables.
fSS​(Tμ​∣n,μH​)=∑k0​+k1​+k2​+k3​+k4​+k5​=n​k0​!k1​!⋯k5​!n!​Πi=05​(b+μH​sbi​+μH​si​​)ki​×fbinned​(Tμ​∣ni​=ki​,i=0,1,⋯,5;μH​)
In this way, the bump structures due to small sample size can be well
predicted. The new asymptotic formulae provide a much better differential
description of the test statistics.Comment: 13 pages, 7 figures, a different perspective, able to describe the
discrete feature in small-statistics case