This research is motivated by the filing of a verzet lawsuit against verstek in case number 135/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Kpn, where the verstek decision has been decided for more than 9 years. This research aims to analyze verzet legal remedies for verstek that has passed the time limit for filing a Verzet Lawsuit. When reflecting on Article 129 HIR, of course, the Verzet Lawsuit is a little deviant, because the time limit for filing a Verzet Lawsuit against Verstek is 14 days after notification of the decision and or 8 days after the aanmaning. The research method conducted by the author is an empirical juridical research method with a socio legal approach. In this case, the author conducted interviews with legal counsel directly and was present in the field to follow the trial. The result of this research is that there is a legal deviation, in which the Panel of Judges accepts the filing of a Verzet Legal Action from the Plaintiff / Former Defendant. The filing of this Verzet has actually exceeded the time limit of the applicable rules. In addition to accepting the Verzet submission, the Panel of Judges also considered the Plaintiff to be the correct Plaintiff. In fact, if the filing of the Verzet has exceeded the time limit, it should be rejected / unacceptable. In addition, the Panel of Judges should have ruled and stated that the Complainant was an incorrect Complainant
