A series of six binuclear Co(II)–thiolate complexes,
[Co2(BPMP)(S–C6H4-o-X)2]1+ (X = OMe, 2;
NH2, 3), [Co2(BPMP)(μ-S–C6H4-o-O)]1+ (4), and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-Y)]1+ (Y = bdt, 5; tdt, 6; mnt, 7), has been synthesized
from [Co2(BPMP)(MeOH)2(Cl)2]1+ (1a) and [Co2(BPMP)(Cl)2]1+ (1b), where BPMP1– is
the anion of 2,6-bis[[bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amino]methyl]-4-methylphenol.
While 2 and 3 could allow the two-electron
redox reaction of the two coordinated thiolates with elemental sulfur
(S8) to generate [Co2(BPMP)(μ-S5)]1+ (8), the complexes, 4–7, could not undergo a similar reaction. An analogous redox reaction
of 2 with elemental selenium ([Se]) produced [{Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se4)}{Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se3)}]2+ (9a) and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se4)]1+ (9b). Further reaction of these
polychalcogenido complexes, 8 and 9a/9b, with PPh3 allowed the isolation of [Co2(BPMP)(μ-S)]1+ (10) and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se2)]1+ (11), which, in turn, could be converted back to 8 and 9a upon treatment with S8 and [Se], respectively.
Interestingly, while the redox reaction of the polyselenide chains
in 9a and 11 with S8 produced 8 and [Se], the treatment of 8 with [Se] gave
back only the starting material (8), thus demonstrating
the different redox behavior of sulfur and selenium. Furthermore,
the reaction of 8 and 9a/9b with activated alkynes and cyanide (CN–) allowed
the isolation of the complexes, [Co2(BPMP)(μ-E2C2(CO2R)2)]1+ (E
= S: 12a, R = Me; 12b, R = Et; E = Se: 13a, R = Me; 13b, R = Et) and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-SH)(NCS)2] (14), respectively.
The present work, thus, provides an interesting synthetic strategy,
interconversions, and detailed comparative reactivity of binuclear
Co(II)–polychalcogenido complexes