Aragao, Alexandra

Born, Charles-Hubert

Bouquelle, Farah

Ciscato, Eleonora

Cliquet, An

Decleer, Kris

Dotinga, Harm

Fleurke, Floor

Leucci, Francesca

Mauerhofer, Volkel

Meertens, Matilde

Mendes, Ana

Queffelec, Betty

Reese, Moritz

Schoukens, Hendrik

Trouwborst, Arie

van Hoorick, Geert

Verschuuren, Jonathan

This assessment is based on the Commission proposal for a Nature Restoration Law (hereafter referred to as NRL) from 22 June 2022.2 The Legal Working Group is aware that the proposal is currently being discussed by the Council and Parliament. It is therefore not an article-by-article assessment, but a more general assessment of several legal aspects of the law we consider to be particularly important. Our choice of the discussed aspects was based on ongoing political discussions on the law (e.g. in the EU parliament and Council). The note gives legal arguments why certain articles should remain in the law or should be amended or added to the law. Legal arguments include legal certainty for stakeholders, coherence with other EU legislation, legitimate expectations, accepted legal principles, etc. Where relevant, we include concrete suggestions for amending and improving the law proposal.<br/

Tilburg University Repository

English

Legal assessment of the Proposal for an EU Nature Restoration Law:Report by the Legal Working Group of the Society for Ecological Restoration Europe

https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/files/69632731/SERE_Legal_Working_Group_assessment_Nature_Restoration_Law_final_210423.pdf

Legal assessment of the Proposal for an EU Nature Restoration Law:Report by the Legal Working Group of the Society for Ecological Restoration Europe

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Tilburg University Repository