Persistent contrails make up a large fraction of aviation's contribution to
global warming. We describe a scalable, automated detection and matching (ADM)
system to determine from satellite data whether a flight has made a persistent
contrail. The ADM system compares flight segments to contrails detected by a
computer vision algorithm running on images from the GOES-16 Advanced Baseline
Imager. We develop a 'flight matching' algorithm and use it to label each
flight segment as a 'match' or 'non-match'. We perform this analysis on 1.6
million flight segments. The result is an analysis of which flights make
persistent contrails several orders of magnitude larger than any previous work.
We assess the agreement between our labels and available prediction models
based on weather forecasts. Shifting air traffic to avoid regions of contrail
formation has been proposed as a possible mitigation with the potential for
very low cost/ton-CO2e. Our findings suggest that imperfections in these
prediction models increase this cost/ton by about an order of magnitude.
Contrail avoidance is a cost-effective climate change mitigation even with this
factor taken into account, but our results quantify the need for more accurate
contrail prediction methods and establish a benchmark for future development.Comment: 25 pages, 6 figure