CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control in young adults
Authors
Anne L. Abbott
Mark A.A. Adelman
+27 more
Andrei V. Alexandrov
Henry J.M. Barnett
Jonathan Beard
Peter Bell
Martin Bj̈orck
David Blacker
Clifford J. Buckley
Richard P. Cambria
Anthony J. Comerota
Alun H. Davies
Hans Henning Eckstein
R. Faruqi
Gustav Fraedrich
Peter Gloviczki
Graeme J. Hankey
Robert E. Harbaugh
E. Heldenberg
Steven J. Kittner
Timothy J. Kleinig
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
Wesley S. Moore
R. Naylor
Andrew Nicolaides
Kosmas I. Paraskevas
David M. Pelz
James W. Prichard
E. Sander Connolly
Publication date
1 March 2012
Publisher
Scholarship@Western
Abstract
In recent years, many important discoveries have been made to challenge current policy, guidelines, and practice regarding how best to prevent stroke associated with atherosclerotic stenosis of the origin of the internal carotid artery. TheUnited States Center forMedicare andMedicaid Services (CMS), for instance, is calling for expert advice as to whether its current policies should be modified. Using a thorough review of literature, 41 leading academic stroke-prevention clinicians from the United States and other countries, have united to advise CMS not to extend current reimbursement indications for carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS) to patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis or to patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis considered to be at low or standard risk from carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It was concluded that such expansion of reimbursement indications would have disastrous health and economic consequences for the United States and any other country that may follow such inappropriate action. This was an international effort because the experts to best advise CMS are relatively few and scattered around the world. In addition, US health policy, practice, and research have tended to have strong influences on other countries. © 2012 The Authors. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Scholarship@Western
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:ir.lib.uwo.ca:medpub-1260
Last time updated on 11/04/2023