Background: Reasons for treatment discontinuation are important not only to
understand the benefit and risk profile of experimental treatments, but also to
help choose appropriate strategies to handle intercurrent events in defining
estimands. The current case report form (CRF) commonly in use mixes the
underlying reasons for treatment discontinuation and who makes the decision for
treatment discontinuation, often resulting in an inaccurate collection of
reasons for treatment discontinuation. Methods and results: We systematically
reviewed and analyzed treatment discontinuation data from nine phase 2 and
phase 3 studies for insulin peglispro. A total of 857 participants with
treatment discontinuation were included in the analysis. Our review suggested
that, due to the vague multiple-choice options for treatment discontinuation
present in the CRF, different reasons were sometimes recorded for the same
underlying reason for treatment discontinuation. Based on our review and
analysis, we suggest an intermediate solution and a more systematic way to
improve the current CRF for treatment discontinuations. Conclusion: This
research provides insight and directions on how to optimize the CRF for
recording treatment discontinuation. Further work needs to be done to build the
learning into Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium standards.Comment: 13 pages, 3 figures, 1 tabl