It is shown that Zaslavskii's misunderstanding of our published proof of the
irrelevance of all extremal black hole configurations (whether with equal
charge and mass or not) rests on his refusal to see the essential difference
between the correct inequality governing extremal and non-extremal actions and
his incorrect version.Comment: 1 page, REVTeX, adapted from reply in PRL 80, 3413 (1998

Ghosh, A.

Mitra, P.

English

arXiv

It is shown that Zaslavskii's misunderstanding of our published proof of the irrelevance of all extremal black hole configurations (whether with equal charge and mass or not) rests on his refusal to see the essential difference between the correct inequality governing extremal and non-extremal actions and his incorrect version.It is shown that Zaslavskii's misunderstanding of our published proof of the irrelevance of all extremal black hole configurations (whether with equal charge and mass or not) rests on his refusal to see the essential difference between the correct inequality governing extremal and non-extremal actions and his incorrect version

Reply to comment by Zaslavskii on extremal black hole action

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CERN Document Server