Using the recent experimental data of B→D(∗)(π,ρ), B→D(∗)Ds(∗), B→J/ψK(∗) and various model calculations on form
factors, we re-analyze the effective coefficients a_1 and a_2 and their ratio.
QCD and electroweak penguin corrections to a_1 from B→D(∗)Ds(∗) and
a_2 from B→J/ψK(∗) are estimated. In addition to the
model-dependent determination, the effective coefficient a_1 is also extracted
in a model-independent way as the decay modes B→D(∗)h are related by
factorization to the measured semileptonic distribution of B→D(∗)ℓνˉ at q2=mh2. Moreover, this enables us to extract model-independent
heavy-to-heavy form factors, for example,
F0BD(mπ2)=0.66±0.06±0.05 and
A0BD∗(mπ2)=0.56±0.03±0.04. The determination of the magnitude of
a_2 from B→J/ψK(∗) depends on the form factors F1BK,
A1,2BK∗ and VBK∗ at q2=mJ/ψ2. By requiring that a_2 be
process insensitive (i.e., the value of a_2 extracted from J/ψK and
J/ψK∗ states should be similar), as implied by the factorization
hypothesis, we find that B→K(∗) form factors are severely constrained;
they respect the relation F1BK(mJ/ψ2)≈1.9A1BK∗(mJ/ψ2). Form factors A2BK∗ and VBK∗ at
q2=mJ/ψ2 inferred from the measurements of the longitudinal
polarization fraction and the P-wave component in B→J/ψK∗ are
obtained. A stringent upper limit on a_2 is derived from the current bound on
\ov B^0\to D^0\pi^0 and it is sensitive to final-state interactions.Comment: 33 pages, 2 figures. Typos in Tables I and IX are corrected. To
appear in Phys. Rev.