497 research outputs found

    ν™˜ν™©ν•΄κΆŒ μžμœ μ§€μ—­ 연계망 κ΅¬μΆ•μ˜ μ „λž΅κ³Ό λ°©μ•ˆ(Strategies and measures for building a localized network of free zones in the Yellow Sea sub-region)

    Get PDF
    λ…ΈνŠΈ : 이 μ—°κ΅¬λ³΄κ³ μ„œμ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ€ κ΅­ν† μ—°κ΅¬μ›μ˜ 자체 μ—°κ΅¬λ¬Όλ‘œμ„œ μ •λΆ€μ˜ μ •μ±…μ΄λ‚˜ κ²¬ν•΄μ™€λŠ” μƒκ΄€μ—†μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€

    The Development Plan of Logistic Infrastructure due to an Open-door Policy of North Korea

    Get PDF
    By reasons of the unexpected and changeable political aspects and environments in Korea Peninsula, the bilateral exchanges between South Korea and North Korea had not been made significant progress, however the economic cooperation between both sides are being enlarged with coming historical initiation after '6&#822815 joint declaration' in 2000. In these points, the logistics infrastructure shall be considered as important factor to assist the economic ties with both Korea and we can estimate some increase in the quantity of goods transported through North Korea due to the opening markets of China & Russia where are near to located in territories of North Korea, which might be resulted that both China and Russia will invest and exploit North Korea's logistics infrastructure as harbor construction, hinterland directly and indirectly. Under the present situations in Korea Peninsula, We ,the Korean, have to prepare Unification of Korea in future, and shall take the concrete plans and actions in order to reduce economic gap of the both with assistances of developments of North Korea. Although the logistics infrastructure is just one of the ways which can lead the mutual cooperation , it's also method to narrow the economy gap between North and South Korea. Therefore the unification of North and South Korea should be realized by the effort of two countries in economic and political division except depending on the power of a foreign country. The economic cooperation with the logistics infrastructure need a constant effort and steady-going preparation to make our ready for unexpected outcome to meet with good results same as any other cooperation between countries.제1μž₯ μ„œλ‘  1 1.1 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½ 및 λͺ©μ  1 1.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ²”μœ„ 2 1.3 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μˆ˜ν–‰λ°©λ²• 3 제2μž₯ λ‚¨λΆν•œ ꡐλ₯˜ ν˜„ν™© 및 전망 4 2.1 남뢁 ꡐλ₯˜μ˜ 일반 ν˜„ν™© 4 2.1.1 κ°œκ΄€ 4 2.1.2 남뢁ꡐ역 및 μ—°ν˜ 5 2.2 남뢁 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯사업 7 2.2.1 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ μΆ”μ§„ν˜„ν™© 7 2.2.2 μ² λ„Β·λ„λ‘œ μ—°κ²° ν˜„ν™© 9 2.2.3 남뢁간 ν•΄μƒν•­λ‘œ 및 μˆ˜μ†‘ν˜„ν™© 15 2.3 ꡐ역 및 μΈμ ‘κ΅­μœΌλ‘œ μΈν•œ λ¬Όλ™λŸ‰ 예츑 19 2.3.1 κ°œμ„±κ³΅λ‹¨ 19 2.3.2 인접ꡭ 영ν–₯으둜 μΈν•œ λ¬Όλ™λŸ‰ 증가 23 제3μž₯ λΆν•œ λ¬Όλ₯˜ κΈ°λ°˜μ‹œμ„€μ˜ ν˜„ν™© 및 νŠΉμ„± 29 3.1 λΆν•œμ˜ μ² λ„Β·λ„λ‘œ 및 ν•­λ§Œ μΈν”„λΌμ˜ ν˜„ν™© 29 3.1.1 λ„λ‘œμ‹œμ„€ ν˜„ν™© 29 3.1.2 μ² λ„μ‹œμ„€ ν˜„ν™© 30 3.1.3 ν•­λ§Œμ‹œμ„€ ν˜„ν™© 31 3.2 λΆν•œμ˜ μ² λ„Β·λ„λ‘œ μΈν”„λΌμ˜ 문제점 32 3.2.1 λ„λ‘œ 32 3.2.2 철도 33 3.2.3 ν•­λ§Œ 33 제4μž₯ 뢄단ꡭ 및 미수ꡐ κ΅­κ°„μ˜ κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ 사둀 36 4.1 동-μ„œλ…κ°„ κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ 사둀 36 4.1.1 κ°œμš” 36 4.1.2 톡일 이전 λ™μ„œλ…κ°„μ˜ ꡐλ₯˜ν˜‘λ ₯ 36 4.2 쀑ꡭ-λŒ€λ§Œκ°„ κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ 사둀 41 4.2.1 κ°œμš” 41 4.2.2 쀑ꡭ과 λŒ€λ§Œμ˜ ꡐλ₯˜ν˜‘λ ₯ 41 4.3 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  44 제5μž₯ 개발 및 투자 λ°©μ•ˆ 47 5.1 남뢁 ꡐ톡 μΈν”„λΌμ˜ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ  μ ‘κ·Ό λ°©μ•ˆ 47 5.1.1 남뢁 μ—°κ²° 인프라 47 5.1.2 λ„λ‘œ 및 μ² λ„μ˜ μ‹œμŠ€ν…œμ  μ ‘κ·Ό λ°©ν–₯ 47 5.2 ν•­λ§Œ ν˜‘λ ₯ λ°©μ•ˆ 54 제6μž₯ κ²°λ‘  58 6.1 μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όμ˜ μš”μ•½ 58 6.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 및 ν–₯후연ꡬ λ°©ν–₯ 58 μ°Έ κ³  λ¬Έ ν—Œ 6

    λΌν‹΄μ•„λ©”λ¦¬μΉ΄μ—μ„œ ν™œλ™ν•˜λŠ” μ€‘κ΅­μ˜ μ„Έ ν–‰μœ„μž: μ •λΆ€, μ€€μ •λΆ€κΈ°κ΄€, κΈ°μ—…

    Get PDF
    μ›μ œμ™€ 좜처: Yang Zhimin, Los actores del desembarco chino en AmΓ©rica Latina, Nueva Sociedad, No. 259, septiembre-octubre de 2015, pp. 45-54.μ§€λ‚œ 20λ…„ λ™μ•ˆ 이루어진 μ€‘κ΅­μ˜ λΌν‹΄μ•„λ©”λ¦¬μΉ΄Β·μΉ΄λ¦¬λΈŒ ν•΄ μ§„μΆœμ€ 세계적인 관심을 λΆˆλŸ¬μΌμœΌμΌ°λ‹€. 특히, 갈수둝 κΈ΄λ°€ν•΄μ§€λŠ” 쀑ꡭ과 λΌν‹΄μ•„λ©”λ¦¬μΉ΄μ˜ 경제적 μœ λŒ€λŠ” 뜨거운 ν† λ‘ μ˜ μ£Όμ œκ°€ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 쀑ꡭ이 μ „ 세계 μ–΄λŠ κ³³μ—μ„œλ‚˜ λ§ˆμ°¬κ°€μ§€λ‘œ λΌν‹΄μ•„λ©”λ¦¬μΉ΄μ—μ„œ 갈수둝 μ€‘μš”ν•œ 역할을 ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€λŠ” 사싀은 μ˜μ‹¬μ˜ 여지가 μ—†λ‹€. 또 μ§€λ‚œ 35λ…„κ°„ 연평균 10%의 κ²½μ œμ„±μž₯λ₯ μ„ μœ μ§€ν•˜λŠ” 세계 μ΅œλŒ€μ˜ μˆ˜μΆœλŒ€κ΅­μ΄μž 세계 제2의 경제 λŒ€κ΅­μœΌλ‘œμ„œ 쀑ꡭ은 라틴아메리카 κ²½μ œμ— μ€‘μš”ν•œ ν–‰μœ„μžλ‘œ κ°„μ£Όλ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. μ˜€λŠ˜λ‚  쀑ꡭ은, 규λͺ¨λ‘œ 보아 λΌν‹΄μ•„λ©”λ¦¬μΉ΄μ˜ λ‘˜μ§Έκ°€λŠ” κ΅μ—­λŒ€μƒκ΅­μ΄μž μ…‹μ§Έκ°€λŠ” νˆ¬μžκ΅­μ΄λ‹€. 쀑ꡭ은 μ•žμœΌλ‘œλ„ 라틴아메리카와 λ”μš± κΈ΄λ°€ν•œ 경제 관계λ₯Ό μœ μ§€ν•  것이닀. μ™œλƒν•˜λ©΄ 쀑ꡭ μ •λΆ€κ°€ 라틴아메리카와 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ μˆ˜μ€€μ„ 높이기 μœ„ν•΄ νŠΉλ³„ν•œ 쑰치λ₯Ό ν–ˆμ„ 뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ 쀑ꡭ과 λΌν‹΄μ•„λ©”λ¦¬μΉ΄Β·μΉ΄λ¦¬λΈŒ ν•΄ κ΅­κ°€ 곡동체 포럼(China-CELAC Forum)을 톡해 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯의 μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ κΈ°λ°˜μ„ κ΅¬μƒν–ˆκΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λ‹€

    μ œλ„μ™€ 관념: APECκ³Ό μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ μ§€μ—­κ΄€λ…μ˜ μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ •μΉ˜μ™Έκ΅ν•™λΆ€ 외ꡐ학전곡, 2015. 8. μ‹ μš±ν¬.λ™μ•„μ‹œμ•„μ—μ„œ 볡수의 μ œλ„μ™€ μ§€μ—­κ°œλ…μ΄ κ³΅μ‘΄ν•˜κ³  λ•Œλ‘œλŠ” 좩돌 λ˜λŠ” κ²½μŸν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ˜€λŠ˜λ‚ , μ œλ„μ™€ κ΄€λ…μ˜ μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©μ„ ν†΅ν•œ μ§€μ—­ν˜•μ„±μ€ μ€‘μš”ν•œ λ¬Έμ œμ΄λ‹€. 특히 μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ 지역은 1990λ…„λŒ€ APECκ³Ό ARFλ“±μ˜ 기ꡬ가 μ„€λ¦½λ˜κ³  μ˜€λŠ˜λ‚ μ—λŠ” TPP와 같은 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯이 μ§€μ†λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μ μ—μ„œ 의미λ₯Ό 가진 μ§€μ—­λ‹¨μœ„μ΄λ‹€. λ³Έ 논문은 λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 두 μ§ˆλ¬Έμ„ κ³ μ°°ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 첫째, APEC은 μ–΄λ–€ 과정을 ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ œλ„λ‘œ ν˜•μ„±λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©° μ–΄λ–€ κ΅¬μ„±μ›μ˜ 관념이 μ€‘μš”ν•˜κ²Œ μž‘μš©ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”κ°€? λ‘˜μ§Έ, APEC μ œλ„ ν˜•μ„± 이후 κ΅¬μ„±μ›λ“€μ˜ 지역관념은 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ λ³€ν™”ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”κ°€? μ œλ„ ν˜•μ„± λ¬Έμ œμ— λŒ€ν•΄ λ³Έ 논문은 냉전기 λ―Έκ΅­, 호주, 그리고 일본에 μ˜ν•΄ λ°œμ „λ˜κ³  μ œμ•ˆλœ μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ μ§€μ—­ν˜‘λ ₯의 ν•„μš”μ„±κ³Ό λ°©μ•ˆμ— λŒ€ν•œ λ…Όμ˜λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. APEC 창립의 동λ ₯은 호주의 μ œμ•ˆμ΄ κ°€μž₯ 큰 역할을 ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , ν˜‘μ˜μ μΈ 성격과 κ·Έ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ€ λ―Όκ°„ κΈ°κ΅¬μ˜€λ˜ PECC의 λ””μžμΈκ³Ό 인적 및 지적 μžμ›μ„ 일뢀 ν‘μˆ˜ν•˜κ³  μ°Έμ‘°ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ ν˜•μ„±λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, λΉ„ν˜•μ‹μ μΈ μ œλ„ νŠΉμ„±μ„ μ„Έμ›Œλ‚˜κ°€λŠ”λ° ASEAN ꡭ가듀이 μ œκΈ°ν•œ 일련의 원칙듀이 의미 μžˆλŠ” μž‘μš©μ„ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν•œνŽΈ, 1993λ…„ 클린턴 ν–‰μ •λΆ€λŠ” μ‹ νƒœν‰μ–‘ 곡동체 κ³„νšμ„ λ°œν‘œν•˜κ³  κ²½μ œμ˜μ—­μ—μ„œ λ‹€μžμ  접근에 κ°•μ„Έλ₯Ό 두며 적극적인 APEC외ꡐλ₯Ό νŽΌμ³€λ‹€. 같은 ν•΄ 우루과이 λΌμš΄λ“œ 타결 이후 APEC의 μ œλ„μ  λͺ©μ μ€ 무역 μžμœ ν™”λ‘œ μ„ νšŒλ˜μ—ˆκ³  1990λ…„λŒ€ μ€‘λ°˜μ— APECλ‚΄μ—μ„œ 무역 μžμœ ν™”μ˜ ꡬ체적 λ‚΄μš©κ³Ό κ³„νš, μ‹œν–‰λ°©μ‹, μžμœ ν™”μ™€ κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯의 비쀑 등에 λŒ€ν•œ λ…ΌμŸμ΄ 일어났닀. μ œλ„ λ…ΌμŸμ˜ κ²°κ³Όκ°€ λ„μΆœλ˜λŠ”λ° ASEAN을 μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ ν•œ ν•œκ΅­, 일본, 쀑ꡭ 간에 ν˜•μ„±λ˜μ–΄ 있던 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯에 λŒ€ν•œ 관심 및 APEC의 λΉ„ν˜•μ‹μ μ΄κ³  μœ μ—°ν•œ μ œλ„ν™”μ— λŒ€ν•œ ν•©μ˜κ°€ μœ μ˜λ―Έν•˜κ²Œ μž‘μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, APEC μ œλ„ ν˜•μ„± 이후 κ΅¬μ„±μ›λ“€μ˜ 지역관념은 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ λ³€ν™”ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”κ°€? APEC의 λ””μžμΈ ν˜•μ„± κ³Όμ •κ³Ό 이λ₯Ό λ‘˜λŸ¬μ‹Ό λ…ΌμŸμ€ κ΅¬μ„±κ΅­λ“€μ˜ 지역관념 변화에 μ–΄λ– ν•œ 영ν–₯을 λ―Έμ³€λŠ”κ°€? μ§€μ—­μΈμ‹μ˜ μΈ‘λ©΄μ—μ„œλŠ” μ œλ„ μ΄ˆκΈ°μ— μ œμ•ˆκ΅­μ΄μ—ˆμœΌλ©° λͺ¨λ‘ 선진ꡭ인 λ―Έκ΅­, 호주, 일본뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ§€μ—­κ΄€λ…μ˜ 수용ꡭ인 ν•œκ΅­κ³Ό λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„ λͺ¨λ‘ μ„œλ‘œ λ‹€λ₯Έ 이유둜 지속과 수용의 κ²°κ³Όκ°€ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. μ€‘μš”ν•œ 점은 μ œλ„ν™” μ΄ˆκΈ°μ—λŠ” λ‹€μžλ¬΄μ—­ν˜‘μƒ 타결과 ν˜‘μƒλ°©μ•ˆ λͺ¨μƒ‰, 그리고 1993λ…„λΆ€ν„°λŠ” 무역 μžμœ ν™” 및 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ μ˜μ œμ— μ§‘μ€‘ν•˜κ²Œ 된 APECμ—μ„œ κ²½ν—˜μ„ 톡해 μ œμ•ˆκ΅­κ³Ό 수용ꡭ λͺ¨λ‘ μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘μ„ μ„œλ‘œ λ‹€λ₯Έ μ˜λ―Έμ—μ„œ μœ μš©ν•œ μ§€μ—­μœΌλ‘œ μΈμ‹ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€λŠ” 것이닀. ν•œκ΅­κ³Ό λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„λŠ” μ œμ•ˆκ΅­λ“€μ˜ 관념을 κ·ΈλŒ€λ‘œ 받아듀이기 λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” κΈ°μ‘΄ 지역인식을 기반으둜 지역인식을 ν™•μž₯ 및 μœ μ§€ν•˜λ©° λ°›μ•„λ“€μ΄λŠ” 양상을 λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. ν•œκ΅­μ€ κΉ€μ˜μ‚Ό ν–‰μ •λΆ€μ˜ 신외ꡐ κΈ°μ‘° λ°œν‘œλ₯Ό 톡해 기쑴에 μ§‘μ€‘ν•˜κ³  있던 λ™λΆμ•„μ‹œμ•„ 지역을 λ„˜μ–΄ μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ μ§€μ—­μ˜ μ€‘μš”μ„±κ³Ό 경제 μ‚¬μ•ˆμ˜ 외ꡐ에 집쀑할 ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ κ°•μ‘°ν–ˆλ‹€. ν•œκ΅­μ—κ²Œ APEC의 κ²½ν—˜, 즉 1991λ…„ 각료회의 κ°œμ΅œμ™€ 1994λ…„ λ¬΄μ—­νˆ¬μžμœ„μ›νšŒ 의μž₯κ΅­ μ„ μ • 및 ν™œλ™μ€ μœ„μ™€ 같은 지역인식을 κ°•ν™”ν•˜κ³  μ§€μ†μ‹œμΌ°λ‹€. λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„ λ˜ν•œ κΈ°μ‘΄ 쀑점을 두고 있던 μ§€μ—­μ˜ 지평을 ν™•μž₯ν•˜λŠ” ν˜•νƒœλ‘œ μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ 관념을 μˆ˜μš©ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 즉 λ§ˆν•˜ν‹°λ₯΄ μ΄λ¦¬λŠ” ASEANκ³Ό λ™μ•„μ‹œμ•„μ— λŒ€ν•œ 쀑점을 기반으둜 μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘μ€ 경제 및 μ•ˆλ³΄ μ‚¬μ•ˆμ˜ λΆˆν™•μ‹€μ„±μ— λŒ€μ‘ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ ν˜‘λ ₯이 ν•„μš”ν•œ μ§€μ—­μœΌλ‘œ μΈμ‹ν–ˆλ‹€. APECλ‚΄μ˜ λ…ΌμŸμ€ λ§ˆν•˜ν‹°λ₯΄κ°€ 기본적으둜 가지고 μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ μ—­λ‚΄ κ΅­κ°€κ°„ μƒν˜Έμ΄ν•΄κ°€ λΆ€μ‘±ν•œ 츑면에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식을 μ§€μ†μ‹œμΌ°κ³ , μ΄λŠ” λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„κ°€ APEC의 μ œλ„ν™” 방식에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ μΌκ΄€μ μœΌλ‘œ 보여쀀 μž…μž₯으둜 λ°©μ¦λœλ‹€. μ œλ„ λ””μžμΈμ˜ ν˜•μ„±κ³Ό 이λ₯Ό λ‘˜λŸ¬μ‹Ό λ…ΌμŸμ˜ 결과둜 μΈν•œ κ΄€λ…μ˜ λ³€ν™”λŠ” 극적인 μ „ν™˜μ΄λ‚˜ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ μ§€μ—­κ΄€λ…μ˜ 수용으둜 λ³΄κΈ°λŠ” μ–΄λ ΅λ‹€. 였히렀 APEC에 λŒ€ν•œ 참여와 내뢀적 λ…ΌμŸμ˜ κ²½ν—˜μ€ λΆ„μ„μ˜ λŒ€μƒμ΄ λ˜μ—ˆλ˜ ν•œκ΅­κ³Ό λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„κ°€ 본래 μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ 각각 λ™λΆμ•„μ‹œμ•„μ™€ λ™λ‚¨μ•„μ‹œμ•„ 및 λ™μ•„μ‹œμ•„λ₯Ό 기반으둜 μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ μ§€μ—­μ˜ μ˜λ―Έμ™€ ν˜‘λ ₯의 ν•„μš”μ„±μ„ λ°›μ•„λ“€μ΄λŠ” ν˜•νƒœλ‘œ μž‘μš©ν–ˆλ‹€. λ³Έ λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ λΆ„μ„μœΌλ‘œλΆ€ν„° ν•œκ΅­κ³Ό λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„ 각ꡭ은 기쑴의 지역관념을 λŒ€μ²΄ν•˜κΈ°λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” μˆ˜μ • 및 ν™•μž₯의 λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ ν•΄λ‹Ή 지역 μ œλ„ν™”μ˜ κ²½ν—˜μ„ μΈμ‹ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” 결둠을 λ„μΆœν•  수 μžˆλ‹€.I. μ„œλ‘  1 1. 문제제기 1 2. 기쑴연ꡬ κ²€ν†  4 1) APECκ³Ό μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ κ³΅λ™μ²΄μ˜ ν˜•μ„± 4 2) λ™μ•„μ‹œμ•„ μ§€μ—­μ£Όμ˜μ™€ μ§€μ—­μ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ  ꡬ성 5 3. 뢄석틀과 연ꡬ방법 6 1) μ œλ„ 6 2) 지역관념 8 3) 연ꡬ방법 10 4. λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ ꡬ성 13 II. APEC의 관념적 μ‹œμ›κ³Ό μ œλ„ν˜•μ„± 15 1. 냉전기 μ•„μ‹œμ•„-νƒœν‰μ–‘ 관념 15 2. APEC의 탄생 및 κ·Έ λ°°κ²½ 21 3. APEC ν˜•μ„±κΈ°μ˜ μ œλ„ λ””μžμΈ 24 4. μ†Œκ²° 30 III. 미ꡭ의 μž…μž₯λ³€ν™”, μ œλ„ λ…ΌμŸ, 그리고 APEC의 μ œλ„ λ³€ν™” 31 1. 클린턴 ν–‰μ •λΆ€μ˜ 지역인식 및 ꡬ상 31 2. APEC μ œλ„ λ…ΌμŸκ³Ό μ£Όμš”κ΅­μ˜ μž…μž₯ 뢄석 35 1) μ‹œμ• ν‹€ 및 보고λ₯΄ 회의 μ„±κ³Ό 및 μ£Όμš” λ…ΌμŸμ  36 2) μ£Όμš” νšŒμ›κ΅­ μž…μž₯ 뢄석 40 3. μ§€μ—­κ΄€λ…μ˜ 반영과 μ œλ„ λ””μžμΈ 44 4. μ†Œκ²° 48 IV. νšŒμ›κ΅­λ“€μ˜ 지역관념 λ³€ν™” 50 1. 지역인식 μ œμ•ˆκ΅­: λ―Έκ΅­, 호주, 일본 50 1) λ―Έκ΅­ 50 2) 호주 51 3) 일본 53 2. 지역인식 수용ꡭ: ν•œκ΅­κ³Ό λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„ 54 1) ν•œκ΅­ 54 2) λ§λ ˆμ΄μ‹œμ•„ 57 3. μ†Œκ²° 65 V. κ²°λ‘  및 ν•¨μ˜ 66 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 69 Abstract 83Maste

    A Study on Peaceful Prosperity and Stabilization of Korean Peninsula through Economic Cooperation between South and North Korea : Primarily on Shipping Cooperation

    Get PDF
    Nowadays, globalization to stand for free market economy order has been rapidly progressing in the world, and each country is devoting her efforts to maximize her economic profits. In that regard, it is desired that interdependence & cooperation and security & peace be steadily kept in the world via mutual compromise and reconciliation. Faced with such a transition period, the South and North have to promote the following two important assignments preponderantly for the purpose of converting conflict and tension among them for the time being to reconciling and cooperating relation and aiming at unification in the long term. First, we are to promote the policy for peace and prosperity to build up the basis of the Korean Peninsula's security and the South & North's peaceful unification, Second, we are to enhance the South and North's economic cooperation. The said two assignments are not independent from each other but closely correlated. In particular, exchange & cooperation between the South and North has a great meaning in aiming at the balanced development and peaceful unification through the South and North's mutual cooperation at the same time of settling the North's economic crisis. The South and North's economic cooperation has been activated with the summit meeting in June, 2000 last, but the result is, in actuality, far under our expectation for it. Therefore, this study is to grope for a more positive plan for activating the South and North's economic cooperation, and the purpose of this study is as follows. First, promoting the present government's policy for peace and prosperity and analysing the result. Second, analysing the actual situation of the South and North's economic cooperation and the plan for its expanding & developing. Third, analysing a plan for building up a South-North marine cooperation system. In order to fulfil the purpose of this study, literature survey and In-depth interview was carried out. First of all, the present government's unification policy related with the promoting background, concept, object & principle of the policy for peace and prosperity was reviewed. The actual conditions of the South and North's economic cooperation project and South-North marine exchange & cooperation was analyzed to draw a plan of expanding & developing South-North's economic cooperation. And an activation plan was made out. The result of this study are summarized as followsFirst, the policy for peace and prosperity set up its two objectives of 'the Korean Peninsula's peace promotion' and 'realizing the South and North's community prosperity. 'The Korean Peninsula's peace promotion' is aimed for promoting the actual cooperation between the South and North on the basis of settling the pending security problems with the North's nuclear problem and converting unstable cease-fire system through building up military reliance. Second, the South and North's great 3 economic cooperation projects including railwayΒ·road connecting construction, Gaesung industrial center construction project and Geumgangsan tour project are steadily promoted, and expanding these great 3 projects invites the contact with other fields, thereby enabling the North to get over its pending economic difficulties and designing a good plan for getting their citizens's life in stability. Third, the South and North put its 4 economic cooperation agreements such as double tax avoidance agreement, firm dispute settlement, investment guarantee and liquidation settlement into effect as of Aug. 20, 2003, and 'the 9th the South and North Economic Cooperation Promotion Committee' made its signature on & exchanged the South and North Marine Agreement on June 05, 2004. Finally, the main assignment to promote in short term for activating the South-North exchange is as follows. In the marine field, To set up the R&D plan for the North's harbor is strongly needed, And, the plan for the North concerns's visiting the South & mutual cooperation is to be discussed. The Seminars for the South and North joint coastal marine development is to be held. The South and North's concerned parties need to share with the principal knowledge of the object and expectation effect of the South and North marine cooperation. In conclusion, expansion of the South-North exchange is to be the means to anchor down security and peace & prosperity in the South and North. In this regard, economic cooperation between the South and North is not only the means to tie up the South and North to one unity but also the driving force for their unification. The more frequent and diversified are economic exchange and cooperation between the South and North, the less is heterogeneousness between them, thereby enabling them to relax their mutual tension and recover our national homogeneity. Conclusively, economic exchange & cooperation between the South and North is to draw the North's change, that is, its opening and reformation, which serves a stepping-stone to settle down peace in this Korean Peninsula and, further, leads to its peaceful unification.Abstract v 제1μž₯ μ„œ λ‘  1 제1절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½ 및 λͺ©μ  1 제2절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 방법 및 ꡬ성 2 제2μž₯ ν•œλ°˜λ„ ν‰ν™”λ²ˆμ˜μ •μ±…μ˜ μ£Όμš”λ‚΄μš© 및 μ„±κ³Ό 4 제1절 ν‰ν™”λ²ˆμ˜μ •μ±…μ˜ λ‚΄μš© 4 1. κ°œλ… 및 좔진배경 4 2. λͺ©ν‘œ 및 좔진원칙 5 3. μΆ”μ§„μ „λž΅ 7 4. νŠΉμ§• 및 의의 9 제2절 ν‰ν™”λ²ˆμ˜μ •μ±…μ˜ μ„±κ³Ό 10 1. λΆν•œ ν•΅λ¬Έμ œμ˜ 평화적 ν•΄κ²° 여건쑰성 10 2. λ‚¨λΆκ΄€κ³„μ˜ 진전과 λΆν•œμ˜ λ³€ν™” 11 제3μž₯ 남뢁 경제 및 ν•΄μš΄ν˜‘λ ₯ ν˜„ν™© 13 제1절 남뢁 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯사업 13 1. κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯사업 μΆ”μ§„ν˜„ν™© 13 2. κ²½μ˜μ„ γ†λ™ν•΄μ„  μ² λ„γ†λ„λ‘œ μ—°κ²° 17 3. κ°œμ„±κ³΅λ‹¨ κ°œλ°œμ‚¬μ—… 20 4. κΈˆκ°•μ‚° 관광사업 ν™œμ„±ν™” 24 5. λŒ€λΆ μ‹λŸ‰μ°¨κ΄€ 제곡 26 제2절 남뢁ꡐλ₯˜ν˜‘λ ₯ κΈ°λ°˜μ‘°μ„± 29 1. 남뢁간 λ¬Όμžκ΅μ—­ 29 2. μœ„νƒκ°€κ³΅κ΅μ—­ 34 3. λ‚¨λΆκ²½ν˜‘ν•©μ˜μ„œ 36 제3절 남뢁 ν•΄μš΄ ν˜„ν™© 39 1. 남뢁 ν•΄μƒμš΄μ†‘ ν˜„ν™© 39 2. 남뢁 ν•΄μƒμš΄μ†‘μ˜ 문제점 43 제4절 λ‚¨λΆν•΄μš΄ν•©μ˜μ„œ μ„œλͺ…Β·κ΅ν™˜ 48 1. ν•΄μš΄ν•©μ˜μ„œ μ„œλͺ…μ˜ 의의 48 2. ν•΄μš΄ν•©μ˜μ„œ μ£Όμš”λ‚΄μš© 49 3. ν•΄μš΄ν•©μ˜μ„œ κΈ°λŒ€νš¨κ³Ό 53 제4μž₯ 남뢁 경제 및 ν•΄μš΄ν˜‘λ ₯ ν™œμ„±ν™”λ°©μ•ˆ 54 제1절 κ²½μ œν˜‘λ ₯ ν™œμ„±ν™”λ°©μ•ˆ 54 1. μœ„νƒκ°€κ³΅ ꡐ역뢄야 54 2. κ³΅λ‹¨μ„€μΉ˜ 55 3. 관광사업뢄야 57 제2절 쀑·μž₯κΈ° κ²½μ œν™œμ„±ν™”λ°©μ•ˆ 59 1. λΆν•œμ˜ λŒ€λ‚¨νˆ¬μž 59 2. 제3κ΅­ κ³΅λ™μ§„μΆœ 60 3. λŒ€λ‹¨μœ„ μž₯μΉ˜μ‚°μ—… μœ‘μ„± 61 제3절 남뢁 ν•΄μš΄ν˜‘λ ₯λ°©μ•ˆ 62 1. ν•΄μš΄ν˜‘λ ₯λΆ„μ•Ό 62 2. ν•΄μš΄κ΄€λ ¨ 사업뢄야 64 제5μž₯ κ²°λ‘  66 제1절 μ—°κ΅¬κ²°κ³Όμ˜ μš”μ•½ 66 제2절 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ μ‹œμ‚¬μ  및 ν•œκ³„μ  69 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ 71 71 7

    A study on the Analysis of Logistics Networks for Intermodal Transportation Services in Northeast Asia

    Get PDF
    Along with the improvement of political relations between China, Japan and Korea in Northeast Asia, its economic exchange has been increasing rapidly. In particular, China is being facilitated the expansion of logistics infrastructure and the efficiency of transportation system such as harbors, railroads, roads for strengthening and integration in connection with economic zone. In addition, Korea and Japan are being also facilitated streamling logistic system like the expansion of logistics infrastructure and computerizing harbor service in order to fulfill swift, seamless logistic system. However intra-trade in Northeast Asia has depended on transportation by sea and air due to break off with inland transportation network, the infrastructure of the harbors and airports has not been enough to handle dramatically increasing trading volume and passengers. The construction of the intercontinental logistic network that can resolve these problems is much possible through the works of the rail and road link between South and North by recent South-North economic cooperation. By Facilitating the development of sea-land intermodal transportation network through efficient connection oriented Korean peninsula, it would be able to piece out and replace inter Northeast asia logistic network centering around marine. In order to support the expansion of economic exchange among the countries in Northeast asia, it is required to build efficient logistic network which is able to reduce transportation cost and time. Consequently, this study suggested competitive of intermodal transportation network utilized TKR, at the connection of TKR that could be built transportation networks among Korea, three provinces in northeast China(Jilin, Liaonig, Heilongjiang) and Japan cities by analyzing transportation cost and time in every each route.제1μž₯ μ„œ λ‘  = 1 1.1 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λ°°κ²½ 및 λͺ©μ  = 1 1.2 μ„ ν–‰ 연ꡬ κ³ μ°° = 2 1.3 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ 방법 및 ꡬ성 = 4 제2μž₯ 동뢁아지역 ꡐ역 및 λ¬Όλ₯˜ ν™˜κ²½ λ³€ν™” = 6 2.1 세계 경제의 ν™˜κ²½λ³€ν™” = 6 2.2 동뢁아지역 κ΅μ—­ν™˜κ²½μ˜ λ³€ν™” = 8 2.2.1 동뢁아 3κ΅­κ°„ ꡐ역 좔이 = 8 2.2.1 동뢁아 3κ΅­κ°„ ꡐ역 ꡬ쑰 뢄석 = 9 2.2.3 쀑ꡭ 동뢁3μ„±μ˜ 경제 및 ꡐ역 ν˜„ν™© = 17 2.3 동뢁아지역 λ¬Όλ₯˜μ •μ±… λ³€ν™” = 20 2.3.1 ν•œκ΅­ = 20 2.3.2 쀑ꡭ = 23 2.3.3 일본 = 25 2.3.4 ν•œμ€‘μΌ ꡐ톡물λ₯˜ν˜‘λ ₯ 좔진 ν˜„ν™© = 26 제3μž₯ 동뢁아지역 λ¬Όλ₯˜λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ ν˜„ν™© 뢄석 = 28 3.1 λ¬Όλ₯˜λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬μ˜ κ°œλ… = 28 3.2 ν•œμ€‘μΌ ν•΄μƒμš΄μ†‘λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ ν˜„ν™© = 29 3.2.1 ν•œγ†μ€‘ ν•­λ‘œ μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ μš΄μ†‘ = 29 3.2.2 ν•œγ†μΌ ν•­λ‘œ μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ μš΄μ†‘ = 31 3.2.3 일ㆍ쀑 ν•­λ‘œ μ»¨ν…Œμ΄λ„ˆ μš΄μ†‘ = 33 3.3 동뢁아지역 μœ‘μƒμš΄μ†‘λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ ν˜„ν™© = 35 3.3.1 쀑ꡭ 동뢁3μ„±μ˜ μš΄μ†‘λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ = 35 3.3.2 λ‘λ§Œκ°•μ§€μ—­ μš΄μ†‘λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ = 36 3.3.3 λ‚¨λΆν•œ μš΄μ†‘λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ = 38 3.3.4 ν•œλ°˜λ„μ’…λ‹¨μ² λ„(TKR)의 μ—­ν•  = 39 제4μž₯ 동뢁아지역 λ³΅ν•©μš΄μ†‘λ„€νŠΈμ›Œν¬ 경쟁λ ₯ 뢄석 = 42 4.1 λ³΅ν•©μš΄μ†‘μ˜ κ°œλ… = 42 4.2 동뢁아지역 λ³΅ν•©μš΄μ†‘ 좔진 ν˜„ν™© = 43 4.2.1 λΈ”λ‘νŠΈλ ˆμΈ(Block Train) κ°œλ… λ„μž… = 43 4.2.2 ν•œγ†μΌκ°„ 철도&ν•΄μš΄ λ³΅ν•©μš΄μ†‘μ„œλΉ„μŠ€ = 45 4.2.3 ν•œγ†μ€‘κ°„ νŠΈλŸ­λ³΅ν•©μΌκ΄€μš΄μ†‘ μ„œλΉ„μŠ€ = 47 4.3 동뢁아지역 λ³΅ν•©μš΄μ†‘ μ‹œλ‚˜λ¦¬μ˜€ 뢄석 = 49 4.3.1 ν•œγ†μ€‘(동뢁3μ„±)κ°„ μš΄μ†‘κ²½λ‘œλ³„ 비ꡐ뢄석 = 49 4.3.2 일ㆍ쀑(동뢁3μ„±)κ°„ μš΄μ†‘κ²½λ‘œλ³„ 비ꡐ뢄석 = 54 4.3.3 κΈ°μ‘΄ ν•΄μƒμš΄μ†‘κ³Ό λ³΅ν•©μš΄μ†‘μ˜ 비ꡐ뢄석 = 58 제5μž₯ κ²°λ‘  및 ν–₯ν›„ 연ꡬ방ν–₯ = 60 5.1 κ²°λ‘  및 μ‹œμ‚¬μ  = 60 5.2 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν•œκ³„ 및 ν–₯ν›„ 연ꡬ방ν–₯ = 62 μ°Έκ³ λ¬Έν—Œ = 6

    μ œλ„μ  ν–‰μœ„μ΄λ‘ μ„ ν†΅ν•œ 동뢁아지역 λ‹€μžν˜‘λ ₯의 μ œλ„ν™” κ³Όμ • 뢄석: λ‘λ§Œκ°• κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ˜ 사둀연ꡬ

    Get PDF
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ (석사)-- μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› : μ •μΉ˜μ™Έκ΅ν•™λΆ€ 외ꡐ학전곡, 2016. 8. μ‹ μš±ν¬.λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 1990λ…„λŒ€μ— μΆœλ²”ν•˜μ—¬ 2016λ…„ ν˜„μž¬κΉŒμ§€ 동뢁아 유일의 λ‹€μžν˜‘λ ₯κΈ°μ œλ‘œμ„œ μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ΄ μ œλ„ν™” λ˜μ–΄ 온 과정을 λ©΄λ°€νžˆ 좔적해 λ΄„μœΌλ‘œμ¨ λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ΄ ν˜•μ„±λ˜κ³  λ°œμ „ν•  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ μ œλ„μ  기제λ₯Ό λ°νžˆλŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ€ λ‘λ§Œκ°• μœ μ—­ μ ‘κ²½μ§€λŒ€μ— μ‘΄μž¬ν•˜λŠ” 인접ꡭ간 자본-노동-μžμ›μ˜ μƒν˜Έλ³΄μ™„μ„±μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 해당지역을 κ³΅λ™μœΌλ‘œ κ°œλ°œν•˜μžλŠ” μ·¨μ§€μ—μ„œ μ‹œμž‘λœ μ†Œμ§€μ—­ν˜‘λ ₯ ν”„λ‘œμ νŠΈμ΄λ‹€. ꡭ제기ꡬ인 μœ μ—”κ°œλ°œκ³„νš(UNDP)의 주도 ν•˜μ— 1990λ…„λΆ€ν„° μΆ”μ§„λ˜κΈ° μ‹œμž‘ν•˜μ—¬ 1995λ…„ λ‘λ§Œκ°•μœ μ—­κ°œλ°œκ³„νš(TRADP: Tumen River Area Development Programme)으둜 곡식 μΆœλ²”λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜, 이후 νšŒμ›κ΅­ κ°„ 이해관계 μ‘°μ •μ˜ μ‹€νŒ¨λ‘œ 사업좔진이 μ€‘λ‹¨λ˜λ©° μ•½ 10λ…„κ°„μ˜ μ†Œκ°•κΈ°λ₯Ό κ±°μΉ˜λ‹€κ°€, 2005λ…„ λŒ€μƒ 지역을 ν™•λŒ€ν•˜κ³  μ‚¬μ—…κ³„νšμ„ ν˜μ‹ ν•˜μ—¬ κ΄‘μ—­λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νš(GTI: Greater Tumen Initiative)μ΄λΌλŠ” μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ ν‹€λ‘œ μ „ν™˜λœ 이후 본격적으둜 λ‹€μ‹œ ν™œμ„±ν™”λ˜λŠ” λͺ¨μŠ΅μ„ λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ˜ μ œλ„ν™” 과정에 λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ 두 가지 μ§ˆλ¬Έμ„ μ œκΈ°ν•˜κ³ μž ν•˜λŠ”λ°, 첫째, μ–‘μžμ£Όμ˜μ  관계λ₯Ό μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±λ˜μ–΄ μžˆλŠ” 동뢁아 μ§€μ—­μ—μ„œ μ™œ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ λ‹€μžν˜‘λ ₯κΈ°μ œκ°€ ν˜•μ„±λ  수 μžˆμ—ˆλŠ”κ°€, 그리고 λ‘˜μ§Έ, λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ΄ 였랜 κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆ λ‘λ“œλŸ¬μ§€λŠ” 경제적 μ„±κ³Όλ₯Ό 보이지 λͺ»ν–ˆμŒμ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μ™œ 동뢁아 ꡭ가듀이 μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 틀을 μ§€μ†μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ§€ν•˜λ©° κ²°κ΅­ λ‹€μ‹œ μ œλ„μ μœΌλ‘œ ν™œμ„±ν™”μ‹œν‚€κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆλŠ”κ°€μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ˜λ¬Έμ΄λ‹€. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ§ˆλ¬Έμ— λŒ€ν•˜μ—¬ λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ— λŒ€ν•œ κΈ°μ‘΄μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 주둜 κ΅­κ°€μ£Όμ˜μ μΈ μ„€λͺ…을 μ œμ‹œν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 동뢁아 κ΅­κ°€λ“€, 특히 뢁-쀑-러 μ ‘κ²½μ§€λŒ€μ˜ 쀑ꡭ과 λŸ¬μ‹œμ•„, λΆν•œμ΄ 졜근 λ‘λ§Œκ°•μ§€μ—­μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ „λž΅μ  관심을 μ œκ³ ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜λ©΄μ„œ ν•΄λ‹Ή μ§€μ—­μ˜ κ°œλ°œμ— 적극적으둜 κ°œμž…ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆκ³ , μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ΅­κ°€μ „λž΅μ  관심을 ν† λŒ€λ‘œ λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ˜ μ œλ„μ  λ°œμ „ λ˜ν•œ ν™œμ„±ν™”λ  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€λŠ” 지적이닀. 특히 κΈ°μ‘΄μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 2009λ…„ 쀑ꡭ이 λ°œν‘œν•œ μ°½μ§€νˆ¬ 사업이 λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ„ μž¬μƒμ‹œν‚€λŠ” 결정적인 μ „ν™˜κ΅­λ©΄μ„ λΆˆλŸ¬μ™”λ‹€κ³  μ„€λͺ…ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ΅­κ°€μ£Όμ˜μ  접근은 μ™œ 쀑ꡭ을 λΉ„λ‘―ν•œ κ΄€λ ¨κ΅­λ“€μ˜ λ‘λ§Œκ°•μ§€μ—­μ— λŒ€ν•œ 관심이 κ°‘μžκΈ° λ†’μ•„μ§€κ²Œ λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, μ™œ 각ꡭ의 κ°œλ³„μ „λž΅μ  관심이 GTIλΌλŠ” λ‹€μžμ  틀을 ν™œμ„±ν™”μ‹œν‚€λŠ” λ°©ν–₯으둜 κ΅¬ν˜„λ˜μ—ˆλŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό μΆ©λΆ„νžˆ μ„€λͺ…해주지 λͺ»ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬μ—μ„œλŠ” μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ§ˆλ¬Έμ— λŒ€ν•œ 닡을 λͺ¨μƒ‰ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ GTIκ°€ λ°œμ „ν•΄ 온 역사적 과정을 μΆ”μ ν•˜λ©°, μ–΄λ–€ κΈ°μ œκ°€ 동뢁아 κ΅­κ°€λ“€μ˜ λ‘λ§Œκ°• 지역에 λŒ€ν•œ 관심을 μœ λ„ν•˜μ˜€κ³  λ‹€μžμ  ν‹€μ˜ ν˜•μ„± 및 지속을 κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κ²Œ ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄μ•˜λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ ν˜„μž¬ GTIκ°€ μ œλ„μ  ν™œμ„±ν™”λ₯Ό 이루게 된 것은 μ• μ΄ˆμ— TRADPκ°€ λ‹€μžμ  ν‹€λ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±λ˜κ³  κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 틀이 μ œλ„μ μœΌλ‘œ κ³ μ°©λ˜μ–΄ μ§€μ†λ˜μ—ˆκΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄λΌλŠ” 결둠에 λ„λ‹¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ˜ν•œ κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ 틀이 고착되게 된 λ°μ—λŠ” κ΅­κ°€ν–‰μœ„μžμ˜ 역할보닀, ν•΄λ‹Ή 지역에 높은 이해관계λ₯Ό 가진 λΉ„κ΅­κ°€ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ μ œλ„μ  ν–‰μœ„κ°€ 보닀 μ€‘μš”ν•œ 역할을 λ‹΄λ‹Ήν•˜μ˜€μŒμ„ 밝히고자 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ²°κ΅­ λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ΄ λ‹€μžμ μΈ ν‹€λ‘œμ„œ 동뢁아지역에 ν˜•μ„±λ˜κ³ , 였랜 κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆ μ§€μ†λ˜λ©° λ‹€μ‹œ μ œλ„μ μœΌλ‘œ ν™œμ„±ν™”λ  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ 것은, 주변적 ν–‰μœ„μžμ˜ μ œλ„μ  ν˜μ‹ λ…Έλ ₯κ³Ό μ€‘μ‹¬ν–‰μœ„μžμ˜ μ „λž΅μ΄ μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©μ„ ν•˜λ©° λ§žλ¬Όλ¦¬λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€κ³  λ³Ό 수 μžˆλ‹€. 즉, μš°μ„  GTIλΌλŠ” λ‹€μžκΈ°κ΅¬μ˜ ν˜•μ„±μ„ 본질적으둜 κ°€λŠ₯ν•˜κ²Œ ν–ˆλ˜ 것은 κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ μ œλ„μ  틀을 κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜κ³  κ·Έ ν‹€ μ•ˆμ— κ΅­κ°€ν–‰μœ„μžλ₯Ό μœ μΈν•˜κ³ μž ν–‰ν•œ 주변적 ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ μ œλ„μ  ν˜μ‹ λ…Έλ ₯이 μ œλ„μ  고착효과(lock-in effect)λ₯Ό λ°œμƒμ‹œμΌ°κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ΄μ—ˆμ§€λ§Œ, μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 주변적 ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ˜ μ œλ„μ  λ…Έλ ₯이 μ‹€μ œμ μΈ μ„±κ³Όλ‘œ μ΄μ–΄μ§ˆ 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ˜ 것은 λ˜ν•œ κ΅­κ°€ν–‰μœ„μžλ“€μ΄ μ „λž΅μ  관심을 보이며 물질적 ν™˜κ²½μ„ μ‘°μ„±ν•΄ μ€€ λ•λΆ„μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀. μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ μ œλ„λ³€ν™”μ˜ 과정은 ν–‰μœ„μž κ°„ μƒν˜Έμž‘μš©μ΄ 지역ꡬ쑰와 λ³΅ν•©μ μœΌλ‘œ μ—°κ³„λ˜λ©° μ œλ„μ˜ λ³€ν™”κ°€ μˆ˜λ°˜λ˜λŠ” 일련의 과정을 잘 보여주고 μžˆλ‹€. 즉, μ–‘μžκ΄€κ³„λ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±λœ 동뢁아 κ΅­μ œκ΄€κ³„μ˜ ꡬ쑰적 μ••λ ₯이 μž‘μš©ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μƒν™©μ—μ„œ, μ£Όλ³€ ν–‰μœ„μžκ°€ λ‹€μžμ μΈ 틀을 λ§Œλ“€κ³  κ·Έ μ•ˆμ— 쀑심 ν–‰μœ„μžλ₯Ό κ³ μ°©μ‹œν‚΄μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 쀑심 ν–‰μœ„μžλ‘œ ν•˜μ—¬κΈˆ ꡬ쑰적 μ œμ•½μ„ 일뢀 μ™„ν™”μ‹œν‚€κ³  μ œλ„μ  λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό 좔동할 수 μžˆλ„λ‘ μ΄‰μ§„ν•˜λŠ” κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ GTIλΌλŠ” λ‹€μžμ  틀이 νƒ„μƒν•˜κ³  ν™œμ„±ν™”λ  수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€λŠ” 것이닀. λ”°λΌμ„œ GTI의 μ œλ„ν™” 과정은 μ „λ°˜μ μœΌλ‘œ 주변적 ν–‰μœ„μžκ°€ μ€‘μ‹¬ν–‰μœ„μžλ₯Ό κ²¬μΈν•˜μ—¬ μ œλ„μ  κ²½λ‘œμ˜μ‘΄μ„±μ„ ν˜•μ„±ν•˜λŠ” 상ν–₯식 μ œλ„ν™”μ˜ κ³Όμ •μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€κ³  뢄석할 수 μžˆκ² λ‹€.β… . μ„œλ‘  1 1. 문제제기 및 μ—°κ΅¬μ§ˆλ¬Έ 1 2. 연ꡬ방법 3 1) μ—°κ΅¬λŒ€μƒ 및 μ‹œκΈ° 3 2) 연ꡬ방법 및 자료 6 3) λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ ꡬ성 7 β…‘. 기쑴연ꡬ검토 및 뢄석틀 8 1. 선행연ꡬ κ²€ν†  8 2. μ‹ μ œλ„μ£Όμ˜μ  μ ‘κ·Ό 15 3. μ œλ„μ  ν–‰μœ„μ΄λ‘ μ˜ 적용 22 4. μ†Œκ²° 및 뢄석틀 29 β…’. λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ˜ λ°œμ „κ³Όμ • 및 μ œλ„μ  λ³€ν™” 33 1. νƒœλ™κΈ°(1988-1998): TRADP ν˜•μ„±κΈ° 37 1) TRADP ꡬ상 및 μ œλ„ν™” κ³Όμ • 37 2) 각ꡭ μ΄ˆκΈ°μž…μž₯ 55 2. μ†Œκ°•κΈ°(1999-2008): TRADPGTI μ „ν™˜κΈ° 60 1) TRADP의 뢀진 및 각ꡭ μž…μž₯λ³€ν™” 60 2) GTI ꡬ상 및 μ œλ„ν™” κ³Όμ • 66 3. μž¬μƒκΈ°(2009-2016): GTI 개혁 및 κ΅­μ œκΈ°κ΅¬ν™” 70 1) 각ꡭ μž…μž₯λ³€ν™” 70 2) GTI의 μ œλ„μ  개혁 73 β…£. λ‘λ§Œκ°•κ°œλ°œκ³„νšμ˜ μ œλ„ν™” κ³Όμ • 뢄석 82 1. 주변적 ν–‰μœ„μžμ˜ μ œλ„μ  ν˜μ‹ νš¨κ³Ό 84 1) 초기 ꡬ상단계 85 2) ν›„κΈ° κ°œν˜λ‹¨κ³„ 95 2. 동뢁아 κ΅­μ œμ •μ„Έ 및 κ΅­κ°€μ „λž΅μ˜ λ³€ν™” 103 1) 초기 ꡬ상단계 103 2) ν›„κΈ° κ°œν˜λ‹¨κ³„ 106 3. 쒅합적 뢄석 109 4. ν•œκ³„μ  117 β…€. κ²°λ‘  121 μ°Έκ³  λ¬Έν—Œ 125 Abstract 138Maste
    • …
    corecore