Publication of original research in urologic journals - a neglected orphan?

The pathophysiologic mechanisms behind urologic disease are increasingly being elucidated. The object of this investigation was to evaluate the publication policies of urologic journals during a period of progressively better understanding and management of urologic disease. Based on the ISI Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Reports and the PubMed database, the number and percentage of original experimental, original clinical, review or commentarial articles published between 2002–2010 in six leading urologic journals were analyzed. “British Journal of Urology International”, “European Urology”, “Urologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigations” (“Urologic Oncology”), “Urology”, “The Journal of Urology”, and “World Journal of Urology” were chosen, because these journals publish articles in all four categories. The publication policies of the six journals were very heterogeneous during the time period from 2002 to 2010. The percentage of original experimental and original clinical articles, related to all categories, remained the same in “British Journal of Urology International”, “Urologic Oncology”, “Urology” and “The Journal of Urology”. The percentage of experimental reports in “World Journal of Urology” between 2002–2010 significantly increased from 10 to 20%. A distinct elevation in the percentage of commentarial articles accompanied by a reduction of clinical articles became evident in “European Urology” which significantly correlated with a large increase in the journal’s impact factor. No clearly superior policy could be identified with regard to a general increase in the impact factors from all the journals. The publication policy of urologic journals does not expressly reflect the increase in scientific knowledge, which has occurred over the period 2002–2010. One way of increasing the exposure of urologists to research and expand the interface between experimental and clinical research, would be to enlarge the percentage of experimental articles published. There is no indication that such policy would be detrimental to a journal’s impact factor

The Impediment of Impotency and the Condition of Male Impotence: A Canonical-Medical Study: Part II, Medical Considerations

To present the problems involved in the matter of male impotence as related to the validity of marriage, the canonical considerations, as prepared by Rev. Paul v. Harrington, J.C.L., were published in the August and November 1958 issues of The Linacre Quarterly. The Medical study as set forth by Dr. Charles J. E. Kickham appears in this issue. Dr. Kickham is a graduate of Holy Cross College and Harvard medical School. He is Associate Professor of Urology at Tufts medical School and is Surgeon-in-Chief, Department of Urology, St. Elizabeth\u27s Hospital, Brighton; Carney Hospital, Boston, and Pondville Cancer Hospital at Norfolk, Mass. He is a diplomate of the American Board of Urology

The Impediment of Impotency and the Condition of Male Impotence: A Canonical-Medical Study: Medical Considerations

To present the problems involved in the matter of male impotence as related to the validity of marriage, the canonical considerations, as prepared by Rev. Paul v. Harrington, J.C.L., were published in the August and November 1958 issues of The Linacre Quarterly. The Medical study as set forth by Dr. Charles J. E. Kickham appears in this issue. Dr. Kickham is a graduate of Holy Cross College and Harvard medical School. He is Associate Professor of Urology at Tufts medical School and is Surgeon-in-Chief, Department of Urology, St. Elizabeth\u27s Hospital, Brighton; Carney Hospital, Boston, and Pondville Cancer Hospital at Norfolk, Mass. He is a diplomate of the American Board of Urology

The Impact of the Extent of Lymphadenectomy on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer : A Systematic Review

Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Peer reviewedPostprin

High-dose Chemotherapy with Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Poor PrognosisAdvanced Germ Cell Tumor

SUMMARYAbout one half of all advanced germ cell tumor( GCT) patients with poor prognosis defined by the InternationalGerm Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) die of cancer. We evaluated salvage high-dosechemotherapy (HDCT) with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for patients with poorprognosis advanced GCT in Dokkyo Medical University. Three patients with poor prognosis advanced GCTwere treated with HDCT as salvage chemotherapy. Two patients had primary testicular GCT and one patienthad primary mediastinal GCT. Treatment responses were pathological complete remission( CR) in one,surgical CR in one and partial remission (PR) in one. Effectiveness and side effects of HDCT with PBSCTfor poor prognosis cases with advanced GCT were shown in this study. However, further accumulation ofthese studies is needed

Ablative therapy for people with localised prostate cancer : a systematic review and economic evaluation

The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 10/136/01. The contractual start date was in April 2012. The draft report began editorial review in October 2013 and was accepted for publication in April 2014. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report. Acknowledgements We thank l the people recruited from the local UCAN for providing valuable consumer insight and advice through their participation as members of the project focus group: - Mark Emberton (Professor of Interventional Oncology), Damian Greene (consultant urologist), Axel Heidenreich (Professor and Director of Department of Urology), Christoph von Klot (specialist in brachytherapy), Roger Kockelbergh (BAUS chairman and Clinical Director of Urology) and Axel Merserburger (Deputy Clinical Director of Urology and Urologic Oncology) for providing their clinical expertise as members of the project advisory group - Edgar Paez (consultant urologist) and Gill Lawrence (Head of Radiotherapy Physics) for providing a list of staff time by grade and specialty involved in EBRT - Debbie Bennett (Radiotherapy Service Manager) for providing estimates for the expected number of uses for EBRT - Ian Pedley (clinical director/clinical oncologist) and Gill Lawrence for providing a list of all resource inputs relevant to brachytherapy - Steve Locks (Consultant Clinical Scientist in Radiotherapy) for providing a list of reusable equipment and consumables used during brachytherapy, along with their unit costs - Sue Asterling (urology research nurse) and Mark Kelly (Acting Divisional General Manager – Theatres) for providing a list of all resource inputs relevant to cryotherapy - Lara Kemp for providing secretarial support. The Health Services Research Unit is core funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Minimally Invasive Urological Interventions in Outpatient Clinic on the Example of Prostate Biopsy

One of the main directions of improving medical care was the introduction of inpatient forms of medical care for patients who do not require round-the-clock supervision.Aim of the research: to prove the effectiveness and economic feasibility of minimally invasive procedures in outpatient conditions.Materials and methods. The study included 3524 patients in the period from 2010 to 2017, who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy on the basis of the Department of urology of polyclinic No. 195 of the Western district of Moscow. For comparison, the patients were taken, who underwent a biopsy of the prostate gland at the base hospital No. 31, No. 51, No. 17.Results. The average number of biopsies performed in hospital No. 31, No. 51 and No. 17 for the year amounted to 344 biopsies, and the average detectability of prostate cancer was 142 (41.3 %). The average number of biopsies per year in the urology department of the branch number 2 GP No. 195 amounted to 440.5, and the average detectability of prostate cancer – 152.8 (34.7 %). Thus, with comparable inpatient detection of prostate cancer in one large outpatient urology center, an average of 28 % more biopsies are performed (440.5 versus 344) than in 3 hospitals over a comparable period of time.Conclusions. Inpatient technologies can reduce the burden on hospitals. The development of hospital-replacing forms is determined by the need of the population and for efficient use of financial and technical resources of health care

A Case of Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma Mimicking a Benign Complicated Renal Cyst on Computed Tomography;Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

We present a case of cystic renal cell carcinoma( RCC) mimicking a benign complicated renal cyst. In thepresent case, the cystic renal mass was classified as Bosniak classification category II on computed tomography(CT), but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated additional septa and enhancement, whichled to an upgraded Bosniak classification( category III). The patient underwent radical nephrectomy. Histologicalexamination showed the cystic necrosis type of RCC

A Glimpse Into Urology Medical School Education: A Multi-Institutional Medical Student Survey

Introduction: Urological education and exposure for medical students is imperative as we face a growing geriatric population with increased urological needs. Previous research has examined American Urological Association (AUA) program director opinions of student exposure, but no surveys have been directed at current medical students. The purpose of this study is to quantify student exposure to and opinions of urology to determine precipitating factors that lead students towards or away from urology as a specialty of choice. Methods: A 14 question (11 multiple choice and 3 fill-in-the blank) Google Survey was developed. Questions ranged from student exposure to urology, consideration of urology as a specialty, to opinions of positive/negative aspects of urology. After receiving IRB approval, the survey was distributed to the deans and student affair offices of 156 AAMC medical schools. Results: Twenty medical schools (13%) disseminated the survey, contributing to 147 student responses with an even gender split. The percentage of MS4s that applied to urology was 9%. Of all the respondents, 11% did not have a urology rotation, and 25% had no exposure throughout medical school. A large proportion of students (54%) felt the urology exposure to be inadequate. The majority of respondents had either a positive (43%) or neutral (48%) perception towards urology. The positive aspects of urology included perceptions of salary (87%), lifestyle (62%), focalized specialization (54%) and use of technology (49%). The negative aspects of urology included competitiveness (75%), resident workload (33%), and focalized specialization (29%). Conclusions: Urological education opportunities during medical school appear to be limited. Many students do not have any exposure to urology, let alone opportunities to experience a clinical rotation in the field. Although the specialization and lifestyle of urology are attractive, the competitiveness of the field seems to have dissuaded many possible applicants. However, with the increased need for urologists and the decreasing supply, future work should focus on increasing medical student exposure to urology

Perception, knowledge, and interest of urologic surgery: A medical student survey

A grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.Background Although only a limited number of medical schools require a formal educational rotation in urologic surgery, urology as a medical specialty continues to attract a large number of students into the match each year. The purpose of this study was to describe medical student awareness, perception, and knowledge of urology, to determine factors influencing students’ consideration of urology as a career, and to determine if prior urology clerkship experience is associated with differences in these variables. Methods In this cross-sectional study, medical students were electronically surveyed in 07/2016. Self-reported and question-based knowledge of urology were determined. A total of 25 factors were assessed with a five-point Likert scale to determine their influence on students’ consideration of urology as a career. Data analysis was performed using R. Results The survey was completed by 114 students (13.5% of all medical students). A total of 11(9.65%)students had previously participated in a urology clerkship. All students reported awareness of urology; however, only 74 students (64.9%) correctly identified the training pathway and job duties of urologists. Self-perceived knowledge of urology was poor but improved with increased medical school training. Question-based assessment also demonstrated increased knowledge with advanced medical school training (27% per year; p < 0.01). Prior urology clerkship experience appeared to be associated with increased urologic knowledge; however, this was confounded by year in medical school training. When assessing factors impacting students’ consideration of a career in urology, ‘combination of medicine and surgery’ was the most positively influential and ‘competitiveness of the specialty’ was the most negatively influential. Conclusions Although medical students are aware of urology as a specialty, they perceive their knowledge of urology as poor. However, knowledge of urology increases throughout medical school training. Multiple factors influence students’ consideration of urology as a career choice. Additional studies are needed to further explore how participation in a formal urology experience alters students’ perceptions and influences their consideration of urology as a career choice