12,475 research outputs found
Banking Reform and the Resumption of Sustained Growth
Faxed to Francesco Baez, El Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
The Relevance of Kalecki
Paper prepared for a Conference at the University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy, April 22-24, 1986
Schumpeter: Finance and Evolution
Prepared for a Conference: “Evolution of Technology and Market Structure in an International Context.. Sponsored by The International Schumpeter Society and The Universita degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy, May 24-27, 1988. Typed manuscript dated July 14, 1988.
Also included here is the paper as it appeared pp. 51-74, in Arnold Heertje and Mark Perlman, Ed. Evolving Technology and Market Structure: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1990
The Tax Reform Now Passing Through Congress Evades the Issue Of Fairness …The Political Issue of Tax Reform Will Not go Away
One of the ongoing columns “The Economy from the Not-so Ivory Tower.
Between Nation and State: Examining the International Romani Unions
Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College
The Functions of a Manager
Undated.
Prepared for a Brown University College-Community Research Program Seminar
The “Reasonableness” of Poverty: Progress and Pitfalls in South Africa’s Socio-economic Jurisprudence
The Constitutional Court of South Africa is perhaps the strongest institution in the country today. It is one of the few places for people to pursue institutional redress. In light of this, this thesis critically examines the reasonableness standard, the depoliticizing rhetoric around poverty the Court uses, as well as the practical obstacles for individuals or groups pursuing public interest litigation through the judiciary. It has found that for the Court to be more effective institution in light of the failings of other bodies conceived of by the Constitution, a number of the Court’s approaches must be altered slightly. The reasonableness standard must function more effectively as a programmatic guide for the government by substantively articulating a minimum core, one which will give government programs a goal to pursue and halt the vicious cycle of programs that don’t know what they are aspiring to. The Court also needs to better recognize the cost of the depoliticizing rhetoric it uses in its judgments, rhetoric that closes down political spaces for contesting poverty. Finally there are technical and practical obstacles including costs, direct access, and individual benefits that poor claimants face when trying to bring socioeconomic issues before the Court. All of these are problems that must be addressed for the Court, as potentially the only institutional actor left to fight for socioeconomic rights, to provide better redress to citizens whose rights have been violated
- …