650,154 research outputs found

    Orbiter/launch system

    Get PDF
    The system includes reusable turbojet propelled booster vehicles releasably connected to a reusable rocket powered orbit vehicle. The coupled orbiter-booster combination takes off horizontally and ascends to staging altitude and speed under booster power with both orbiter and booster wings providing lift. After staging, the booster vehicles fly back to Earth for horizontal landing and the orbiter vehicle continues ascending to orbit

    Swift Launch Lithograph

    Get PDF
    This one-page lithograph describes the science conducted by NASA-s Swift satellite mission and provides an activity for students. Swift's primary goal is to unravel the mystery of gamma ray bursts. Educational levels: Middle school, Intermediate elementary

    Pioneer C launch

    Get PDF
    Prelaunch news release on Pioneer C spacecraft mission objectives and specification

    Launch Vehicle Description

    Get PDF
    The Thorad-Agena is a two-stage launch vehicle consisting of a Thorad first-stage and an Agena second-stage, connected by a booster adapter. The composite vehicle, including the shroud and the booster adapter, is about 33 meters (109 ft) long. The total weight at lift-off is approximately 91 625 kilograms (202 000 lbm)

    Gemini Launch vehicle

    Get PDF

    OAO-B /To be launched no earlier than 17 November 1970/ - Press kit

    Get PDF
    OAO-B mission plans, launch vehicle, launch operations, and equipmen

    Fifth FLTSATCOM to be launched

    Get PDF
    Launch of the FLTSATOOM-E, into an elliptical orbit by the Atlas Centaur launch vehicle is announced. The launch and relevant launch operations are described. A chart of the launch sequence for FLTSATCOM-E communication satellite is given

    Attitude-dependent launch window analysis for the Hubble Space Telescope Mission

    Get PDF
    Launch window analysis for Space Shuttle missions determines the launch times which will ensure that all payload and Shuttle requirements for the mission are met. Attitude and pointing analysis determines Shuttle Orbiter attitudes that meet various communication, viewing, and thermal requirements for the Orbiter and its payloads. Historically, launch window analysis and attitude and pointing analysis for Shuttle missions have been done separately, without directly influencing each other. However, methods have been developed to consider simultaneously dependencies between launch window and attitude and pointing requirements if they arise. These methods were developed from the launch window analysis for STS-31, the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) deployment mission. To release the HST, the Orbiter attitude had to remain inertially fixed while pointing the HST at the Sun. The Orbiter release attitude and the HST release time were determined from the position of the Sun and varied with launch time and launch date. The launch window analysis for STS-31 centered on how to determine the range of launch times for a given launch date that would allow the Shuttle to release the HST and simultaneously satisfy communication, attitude, and lighting requirements for the deployment operations. Discussed here are how the HST deployment requirements determined the launch window and how the Orbiter release attitude affected the launch window

    National Security Space Launch

    Get PDF
    The United States Space Force’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL) program, formerly known as the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program, was first established in 1994 by President William J. Clinton’s National Space Transportation Policy. The policy assigned the responsibility for expendable launch vehicles to the Department of Defense (DoD), with the goals of lowering launch costs and ensuring national security access to space. As such, the United States Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) started the EELV program to acquire more affordable and reliable launch capability for valuable U.S. military satellites, such as national reconnaissance satellites that cost billions per satellite. In March 2019, the program name was changed from EELV to NSSL, which reflected several important features: 1.) The emphasis on “assured access to space,” 2.) transition from the Russian-made RD-180 rocket engine used on the Atlas V to a US-sourced engine (now scheduled to be complete by 2022), 3.) adaptation to manifest changes (such as enabling satellite swaps and return of manifest to normal operations both within 12 months of a need or an anomaly), and 4.) potential use of reusable launch vehicles. As of August 2019, Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, SpaceX, and United Launch Alliance (ULA) have all submitted proposals. From these, the U.S. Air Force will be selecting two companies to fulfill approximately 34 launches over a period of five years, beginning in 2022. This paper will therefore first examine the objectives for the NSSL as presented in the 2017 National Security Strategy, Fiscal Year 2019, Fiscal Year 2020, and Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAA), and National Presidential Directive No. 40. The paper will then identify areas of potential weakness and gaps that exist in space launch programs as a whole and explore the security implications that impact the NSSL specifically. Finally, the paper will examine how the trajectory of the NSSL program could be adjusted in order to facilitate a smooth transition into new launch vehicles, while maintaining mission success, minimizing national security vulnerabilities, and clarifying the defense acquisition process.No embargoAcademic Major: EnglishAcademic Major: International Studie
    • …
    corecore