Fernando de Castro and the discovery of the arterial chemoreceptors

Producción CientíficaWhen de Castro entered the carotid body(CB)field,the organ was considered to be a small autonomic ganglion,a gland,a glomusorglomerulus,or a paraganglion. In his 1928 paper,de Castro concluded:“Insum,the Glomuscarotic umisinnervated by centripetal fibers,whose trophic center sare located in thesensory ganglia of the glossopharyngeal, and not by centrifugal[efferent] or secret o motor fibers a sisthe case for glands ; these are precisely the facts which lead to suppose that the Glomuscaroticumisa sensory organ.”A few pages down,de Castro wrote:“The Glomus represents an organ with multiplereceptors furnished with specialized receptor cells like those of the sensory organs [tastebuds?]...As aplausible hypothesis we propos et hattheGlomuscaroti cum represents a sensory organ, at present the only one in its kind, dedicated to capture certain qualitative variations in the composition of blood, a function that,possibly by are flex mechanism would have an effect on the functionalactivity of other organs... Therefore, thesensory fiber would not be directly stimulated by blood, but via the intermediation of the epithelial cell soft he organ, which, as their structures suggests, possess a secretory function which would participate in the stimulation of the centripetal fibers.”In our article we will recreat et he experiments that allowed Fernando de Castrotoreach this first conclusion. Also, we will scrutinize the natural endowment sand the scientific knowledge that drove de Castrotomaket the triple hypotheses : the CBaschemoreceptor (variationsinbloodcomposition),as a secondary sensory receptor which functioning involves a chemical synapse, and as a center, origin of systemicreflexes. After a brief account of the systemic reflex effects resulting from the CB stimulation, we wil lcomplete our article with a general view of the cellular-molecular mechanisms currently thought to be involved in the functionin go fthis arterial chemoreceptor

Fernando de Castro and the discovery of the arterial chemoreceptors

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).When de Castro entered the carotid body (CB) field, the organ was considered to be a small autonomic ganglion, a gland, a glomus or glomerulus, or a paraganglion. In his 1928 paper, de Castro concluded: "In sum, the Glomus caroticum is innervated by centripetal fibers, whose trophic centers are located in the sensory ganglia of the glossopharyngeal, and not by centrifugal [efferent] or secretomotor fibers as is the case for glands; these are precisely the facts which lead to suppose that the Glomus caroticum is a sensory organ." A few pages down, de Castro wrote: "The Glomus represents an organ with multiple receptors furnished with specialized receptor cells like those of other sensory organs [taste buds?]...As a plausible hypothesis we propose that the Glomus caroticum represents a sensory organ, at present the only one in its kind, dedicated to capture certain qualitative variations in the composition of blood, a function that, possibly by a reflex mechanism would have an effect on the functional activity of other organs... Therefore, the sensory fiber would not be directly stimulated by blood, but via the intermediation of the epithelial cells of the organ, which, as their structure suggests, possess a secretory function which would participate in the stimulation of the centripetal fibers." In our article we will recreate the experiments that allowed Fernando de Castro to reach this first conclusion. Also, we will scrutinize the natural endowments and the scientific knowledge that drove de Castro to make the triple hypotheses: the CB as chemoreceptor (variations in blood composition), as a secondary sensory receptor which functioning involves a chemical synapse, and as a center, origin of systemic reflexes. After a brief account of the systemic reflex effects resulting from the CB stimulation, we will complete our article with a general view of the cellular-molecular mechanisms currently thought to be involved in the functioning of this arterial chemoreceptor. © 2014 Gonzalez, Conde, Gallego-Martín, Olea, Gonzalez-Obeso, Ramirez, Yubero, Agapito, Gomez-Niño, Obeso, Rigual and Rocher.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant number BFU2012-37459 to Constancio Gonzalez), by Spanish Ministry of Health-Institute Carlos III (Grant CIBER CB06/06/0050 to Constancio Gonzalez) and by PTDC/SAU-ORG/111417/2009 (Portugal to Silvia V. Conde).Peer Reviewe