Drought legacies are short, prevail in dry conifer forests and depend on growth variability

1. The negative impacts of drought on forest growth and productivity last for several years generating legacies, although the factors that determine why such legacies vary across sites and tree species remain unclear. 2. We used an extensive network of tree-ring width (RWI, ring-width index) records of 16 tree species from 567 forests, and high-resolution climate and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) datasets across Spain during the common period 1982‒2008 to test the hypothesis that climate conditions and growth features modulate legacy effects of drought on forests. Legacy effects of drought were calculated as the differences between detrended-only RWI and NDVI series (i.e. after removing long-term growth trends) and pre-whitened RWI and NDVI series predicted by a model including drought intensity. Superposed Epoch Analysis (SEA) was used to estimate whether legacy effects differed from random. Finally, legacy effects were related to water balance, growth persistence and variability, and tree species identity. 3. We found a widespread occurrence of drought legacy effects on both RWI and NDVI, but they were seldom significant. According to SEA, first-year drought legacies were negative and different from random in 9% and 5% of the RWI and NDVI series respectively. The number of significant second- and third-year legacies was substantially lower. Differences between RWI and NDVI legacies indicate that canopy greenness and radial growth responses to drought are decoupled. We found variations in legacies between tree species with gymnosperms presenting larger first-year drought legacies than angiosperms, which were exposed to less severe droughts. Greater growth variability can explain the presence of first-year RWI legacies in gymnosperms from dry sites despite that the relationship between growth variability and legacies was complex. 4. Synthesis. Accounting for species and site responses to drought provides a better understanding of the magnitude and duration of drought legacies on forest growth and productivity. Despite the widespread occurrence of growth reductions in the years during and after drought occurrence, significant legacies were not very common, mostly lasted one year, and were more widespread in gymnosperms. These are relevant factors to be considered in the future when studying the consequences of drought on forest productivity and tree growth.This study was financially supported by: Xunta de Galicia, Grant/ Award Number: PGIDIT06PXIB502262PR, GRC GI-1809; INIA, Grant/Award Number: RTA2006-00117; CANOPEE, 2014-2020- FEDER funds; and Spanish Science Ministry: RTI2018-09688 4- B-C31, RTI2018-096884-B-C33, AGL2017-83828-C2-2R and ENV4-CT97-0641 projects. GSB was supported by a ‘Juan de la Cierva Formación’ grant from MINECO (FJCI 2016-30121). This re - search was supported by the BERC 2018-2021 program, and by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities t hrough the BC3 María de Maeztu excellence accreditation (MDM-2017- 0714) and the IBERYCA (CGL2017-84723-P) project. R.S.S. was s up - ported by VULBOS project (UPO-1263216, FEDER Funds, And alusia Regional Government, Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad 2014-2020), and A.H. by PinCaR pro ject (UHU-1266324, FEDER Funds, Andalusia Regional Government Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad 2014-2020). K.N. was supported by the Ministry of Educatio n, Science and Sports (Republic of Slovenia, Raziskovalci-2.1- UL-BF- C3330-19-952011). We sincerely thank the in-depth analyse s and comments provided by the reviewers

Drought legacies are short, prevail in dry conifer forests and depend on growth variability

12 Pags.- 34Figs.- 3 Tabls.Abstract The negative impacts of drought on forest growth and productivity last for several years generating legacies, although the factors that determine why such legacies vary across sites and tree species remain unclear. We used an extensive network of tree‐ring width (RWI, ring‐width index) records of 16 tree species from 567 forests, and high‐resolution climate and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) datasets across Spain during the common period 1982‒2008 to test the hypothesis that climate conditions and growth features modulate legacy effects of drought on forests. Legacy effects of drought were calculated as the differences between detrended‐only RWI and NDVI series (i.e. after removing long‐term growth trends) and pre‐whitened RWI and NDVI series predicted by a model including drought intensity. Superposed Epoch Analysis (SEA) was used to estimate whether legacy effects differed from random. Finally, legacy effects were related to water balance, growth persistence and variability, and tree species identity. We found a widespread occurrence of drought legacy effects on both RWI and NDVI, but they were seldom significant. According to SEA, first‐year drought legacies were negative and different from random in 9% and 5% of the RWI and NDVI series respectively. The number of significant second‐ and third‐year legacies was substantially lower. Differences between RWI and NDVI legacies indicate that canopy greenness and radial growth responses to drought are decoupled. We found variations in legacies between tree species with gymnosperms presenting larger first‐year drought legacies than angiosperms, which were exposed to less severe droughts. Greater growth variability can explain the presence of first‐year RWI legacies in gymnosperms from dry sites despite that the relationship between growth variability and legacies was complex. Synthesis. Accounting for species and site responses to drought provides a better understanding of the magnitude and duration of drought legacies on forest growth and productivity. Despite the widespread occurrence of growth reductions in the years during and after drought occurrence, significant legacies were not very common, mostly lasted one year, and were more widespread in gymnosperms. These are relevant factors to be considered in the future when studying the consequences of drought on forest productivity and tree growth.This study was financially supported by: Xunta de Galicia, Grant/Award Number: PGIDIT06PXIB502262PR, GRC GI‐1809; INIA, Grant/Award Number: RTA2006‐00117; CANOPEE, 2014‐2020‐FEDER funds; and Spanish Science Ministry: RTI2018‐096884‐B‐C31, RTI2018‐096884‐B‐C33, AGL2017‐83828‐C2‐2R and ENV4‐CT97‐0641 projects. GSB was supported by a ‘Juan de la Cierva Formación’ grant from MINECO (FJCI 2016‐30121). This research was supported by the BERC 2018‐2021 program, and by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the BC3 María de Maeztu excellence accreditation (MDM‐2017‐0714) and the IBERYCA (CGL2017‐84723‐P) project. R.S.S. was supported by VULBOS project (UPO‐1263216, FEDER Funds, Andalusia Regional Government, Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad 2014‐2020), and A.H. by PinCaR project (UHU‐1266324, FEDER Funds, Andalusia Regional Government, Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad 2014‐2020). K.N. was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports (Republic of Slovenia, Raziskovalci‐2.1‐UL‐BF‐ C3330‐19‐952011).Peer reviewe