Across disciplinary boundaries towards a sustainable life: psychodynamic reflection on human behaviour ; dedicated with eternal gratitude and in high esteem to Prof. Dr. Rainer Fuchs

Contents: Introduction: Inga Krättli: Long-term Responsibility for a Sustainable Life: Introductory Panel Session and Roundtable Discussion (15-22); Part 1: On Organisations and Philosophies of Development: Isolde M. Schönstein: Die Verantwortung der Kirchen für nachhaltige Entwicklung (25-33); Emil Brix: Zivilgesellschaft als Chance für die Demokratie (35-42); Michal Sicinski: Ecology and Sustainable Development within a General Social Theory: Old and New Approaches (43-52); Part 2: On Higher Education and Cases of Institution Building: Norbert Derner: Mutual Relationships of Personal Interests and the Evolution of Complex Social Systems (55-59); R. Garleja, I. Kerpe: Innovative Changes in the Social Demand for Lifelong Education (61-66); Richard J. Bartak: Bioakademie - Bildungsprojekt zum ökologischen Landbau in der Tschechischen Republik (67-74); Vijaya Sherry Chand, Elmar A. Stuhler and Sasi Misra: The Fachhochschule System of Higher Education: University of Applied Sciences, Landshut and University of Applied Sciences, Freising-Weihenstephan (75-86); Part 3: Interdisciplinary Studies on National Parks, Ecotourism and Investment: Jan W. Dobrowolski: An Interdisciplinary Study of, and Education for, the Sustainable Development of National Park Regions in Poland and a New Concept of Sound Tourism Management applied to the Cinque Terre National Park in Italy (89-100); Aleksandra Wagner, Jan W. Dobrowolski, Maria Zielinska: Ecotourism as a Factor of Sustainable Development of Specially Protected Regions (101-108); Philippos Nicolopoulos: The Large Scale Investments in Alternative Tourism and Sustainable Development: The Case of Crete and Arcadia (109-121); Part 4: Living Space Resources, Evaluation of Raw Materials, Agricultural and Food Policy: Drago Muvrin: Sustainable Development through Research and Learning. Sustainable Development and Habitation. An Approach to the Use of Living Space Resources (125-136); Ingeborg Bauer: Basic Principles of the Bavarian Agricultural Policy and its Contribution to Sustainable Development (137-142); Aija Melngaile: Global Aspects of Food Chain Development (143-149); Richard J. Bartak: Evaluating the Use of Raw Materials for Food Production from Economic, Ecological, Ethical and Social Points of View (151-162); Part 5: International Agricultural Research for Development: Sabine Homann, Andre van Rooyen, Thinah Moyo and Zivayi Nengomasha: Strengthening Livestock Market Flows and Feeding Practices for Improved Livelihoods in Southern Zimbabwe (165-173); Sabine Homann, Barbara Rischkowsky, Jörg Steinbach, Michael Kirk: Towards Endogenous Development: Borana Pastoralists' Response to Environmental and Institutional Changes (175-182); Sabine Homann, Barbara Rischkowsky, Jörg Steinbach: Herd Mobility Leads the Way for Sustainable Pastoral Development: The Case of Borana Rangelands, Southern Ethiopia (183-194); Part 6: Aspects of Eco-Design and Development, Innovation as well as Renewable Energy Sources: Marion Hersh: Ecodesign for All: Principles and Practice (197-216); Jozica Knez-Riedl: Developing a Sustainable/Holistic Firm (217-225); Majda Bastic: Analysis of Slovenian New Products from Environmental Viewpoint (227-234); Jan Fiedler: The Economics of Renewable Energy Sources in the Czech Republic (235-240); Part 7: Technological Issues and Opportunities: Zinaida Klestova, Alexander Makarenko, Eugene Samorodov: Geoinformational Systems in society Transformation. System Analysis and Transregional Infrastructure (243-250); T. Abadjieva: Effect of Solar Radiation on Materials and Design of Buildings in Botswana (251-258); Vera Vokolkova: Road Transport and its Contribution to Global Warming with Special Regards to Developing Countries (259-269); Dana Wenscheova: Transportation and Environment in the City of Brno (271-275); Antonin Kremr: The Modrice Project - Reconstruction and Intensification of the City Waste Water Treatment Plant in Brno (277-280); Part 8: Latvian Processes and Methodologies: I. Skards, J. Raipulis, I. Karlsone, V. Strazdina: Why Have Suicide Rates in Baltic States Increased after Restoration of Independence after 1990 (283-296); Ilmars Skards, Jekabs Raipulis, Ilga Karlsone: Demographic Situation in Latvia and the Conditions which Limit it (297-310); A. Goldsteins: State Forest Certification Activities in Latvia (311-315); Part 9: Our New Enemy: Timi Ecimovic: The Climate Change System (319-334); Melanie Thun: "Shishmaref Must Yield" (335-336); Werner Zeppenfeld: Tuvalu: An Island Nation Cables SOS (337); Part 10: Possible Follow up Studies: Rainer Fuchs, Shalini Misra: Need and Possibility for Analysing Human Motivation Potential - Related to Sustainability (341-363); Rainer Fuchs: Goal-oriented Action: The Interaction of Process Components in Terms of Cybernetic Theory (365-380); Elmar A. Stuhler: The Usefulness of Action Psychology for Multipurpose Agribusiness (381-393); Elmar A. Stuhler: Retrospect and Prospect (395-400)

The General Theory of Metadynamics Systemicity

The General Theory of Systemicity is being published - part after part since 2004 - from after the application of “The Bioethism Transdisciplinary Paradigm” that the author J.-J. Blanc developed since 1996. Made from an extensive research on "Systems science" that induced to his developing a new systemic paradigm, it was termed as a transdisciplinary approach to "Living systems" he named “The Bioethism”. A paradigm that is meant to support the acquisition of a large understanding on living systems' as naturally structuring and behaving for survival while adapting to their milieu.The "Cosmo-planetary and terrestrial metadynamics systemicity”, the “Life’s metadynamics systemicity”, and the "Biological survival metadynamics systemicity" processes are the core of the General Theory, which, resulting from a large research and approach of the whole set of universal metadynamics and their retroactivity, shows their interrelationship and interdependency. The systemicity of their atomic and molecular cycles has made and sustains both cosmic systems and Life on planet Earth. As to exist, living creatures replicate and evolve within global, glocal and local permanently changing endogen milieu and external environmental ecosystems.   The Universe Cosmo-planetary gigadynamics and metadynamics systemicity have participated in the Sun and its planets to form, and particularly Earth orbiting around it on a right “habitable green zone”. The General Theory shows the close links between Cosmo-planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamics systemicity, its forces, fluxes and moves cycles that made Life to have happened and thriven. From proto-organisms to humans, their individualities, social traits and behavioral statuses have accounted for the biodiversity of species developing or getting extinct over billions of years. For example, when the Earth became a "snowball" from a nearly total glaciation (-600 Mo/y), the survival of some bacteria and micro-organisms escaping the drastic extinction of most species, conversely boosted up an extraordinary explosion of marine species bearing quite new functions (- 545Mo/y), that after volcanism reheated the planet from the systemicity of interrelated terrestrial and cosmic metadynamics. These metadynamics are the main physicochemical cosmic, galactic, stellar, planetary and terrestrial feedback processing atoms to participate in forming matter and cosmic objects (nebulae, baby stars, stars and planets), within a molecular world as originated from after the “Big Bang”.Influenced with a certain number of forces, and going towards specific directions in the environment, Life as a whole is confronted with gravitation, electromagnetism, chemical and physical phenomena…, particularly temperature and the “thermodynamics of entropy”, all being forces and fluxes which driving diversity is concomitant. Furthermore, Life is confronted with the driving of terrestrial dynamic cycles of water, minerals, and climates which currents drive ecosystems metabolism. Among drivers are the coalescence, conjunction, co-evolution, convergence, symbiosis, percolation, phase transition and threshold output, neighborhood adaptation. Then feedback drives universal atomic, molecular and physicochemical worlds permanently provoking the evolution of the several metadynamics systemicity cycles. The specific bonds and traits of structures and behaviors as well as the evolution trends of “surviving living creatures” require some knowledge about actions-reactions (drivers) with ago-antagonistic signals and stimuli emerging from their ecosystemic and socio-systemic metabolism and environmental conditions. Since resulting in some sort of a confrontation between the body milieu and the natural environment, the narration and treatment of a general information refers to the fundamental “survival metadynamics systemicity" and “its drivers” like “symbiosis” and “feedback” as processing stimuli and signals to sustain their metabolism balance from both internal and external changing conditions. Part five of this theory only describes some drivers: symbiosis, coalescence, convergence and synergy, percolation, phase transition, threshold output, feedback… that permanently influence the systemicity of cosmic matter, objects and things interacting among the universal networks of the 3D worlds. Feedback driving the survival metadynamics systemicity sustains “the atomic and molecular cycles from cradle to grave”

The theory of “Life’s complex systemicity”, is shown as the life’s meta-dynamic of its sustainability: a “Bioethism transdisciplinary approach” result

An extensive research by the author, J-J. Blanc, on "Systems science" (since 1996) induced to his creating a new systemic paradigm for a transdisciplinary approach of living systems. Named “The Bioethism”, it was developed towards a large understanding of living systems origin, their natural structures, behaviors, bonds and evolution while permanently interacting with environmental events both within their body and their ecosystemic and sociosystemic environments, together with their status and evolution direction. Beyond the sense given to the noun and the adjective “systemic” as linked to the notion of very many systems in general, the notion of “systemicity”, is, in this new theory, far more suggestive of the global dynamics, as “meta-drivers”, that made Life to exist and sustain. To illustrate the dynamical sense of it, it is only to refer to another notion that has a dynamic sense: the “velocity ”. The survey of the different disciplines concerned with living systems' survival, an analytical methodology and analysis of the above processes, led to the emergence of a new theory the author called “The Life’s complex systemicity” that is relying on the entire body of dynamics that made and make life to exist and sustain, thus adapting to the dynamics of changes. A "meta-systemicity" participates in such move in terms of the retroactive physical and cosmic dynamics world. At the Asilomar ISSS 48th conference (2004), the author, introducing the notion of "systemicity" and its theory, first described “survival”: a circular and regulating set of dynamic moves permanently fed along with a psychophysiological body streaming biochemical matters and information feedback. Those moves are fed from necessary survival interactions and retroaction as they result from the endogenous or exogenous milieu changes. The body of these retroactive phenomena that are fundamental to living system's survival, suggested another and complementary approach in the form of a new paradigm. As central to Life’s dynamic, these systemic circular phenomena as the product of interactions with the environment of life's ecosystems and creatures' bodily structures were then named by the author: the “environmental-psycho-somatopsychism”, (a neologism and its abbreviation: "e-psop”). A overview upon the entire body of interdependent bio-physicochemical mechanisms, processes and streams, interwoven within "3D networks" shows that systemic survival abilities and performances are epigenetically provided from the convergence of cosmic forces (magnetic, gravitational…) and planetary conditions (geologic, geochemical, geophysical, geo-climatic…) that retroactively sustains individual creatures to exist and survive within a world of inevitable interdependency. The efficiency of the streams of circular information, stimuli and survival activities require adaptation to the dynamics of these "physicochemical games" and other environmental changes. The energy that is required is provided for by environments and transformed into metabolic results that "fuel" the vitality of life's biological processes. Then, epigenetic and emergent results induced to from the cosmic physicochemical world, together with evolution changes, promote biochemical and physiological processes, that structure, assimilate and form body components, psychic structures and differential metabolic outputs for creatures to survive. The “entirety” of these universal, cosmic forces, planetary mechanisms and processes, as individually and globally dynamic, sustains the notion that such "Systemicity" is the meta-dynamic that was and is Life to be. As the description of "The Theory of Systemicity" will requires several communications, it is here decided to brush up some of the scientific principles that support the whole complexity of "Systemicity". We will nevertheless partly develop the historical and timely aspect of "Systemicity" as part of the meta-systemic dynamics that sustain our Planet as "Gaïa" and Life as the convergence of emergent results

The General Theory of Metadynamics Systemicity

ABSTRACT Ever since 1996, J.-J. Blanc, the author of this theory, made an extensive research on "Systems science" that induced to his developing a new systemic paradigm in terms of a transdisciplinary approach to "Living systems" that he named “The Bioethism” (see note ). The transdisciplinary approach is meant to support the acquisition of a large understanding of living systems' origin, of their natural structure and their adaptive behaviors. Their specific bonds and traits, as well as their evolution trends, while permanently interacting with environmental events for survival , require actions-reactions from ago-antagonistic signals and stimuli. Endogenous within their body milieu and exogenous, these signals and stimuli are adapting with conditions of ecosystemic and sociosystemic environments. Thereby, living beings are closely linked with and affected by - a) Cosmo-planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamic forces, - b) early Earth metadynamics conditions for Life to have happened - c) the specific biological individualities and social traits and statuses accounting for the biodiversity of species to thrive and/or to get extinct – d) behavioral and evolutionary trends emerging from the systemicity of biological metadynamics sets. For example the drastic extinction of species, except some bacteria, when the Earth became a "snowball" from a nearly total glaciation (-600 Mo/y) and, on the contrary, an extraordinary explosion of marine species bearing new functions (- 545Mo/y) after the planet reheating. At this point of publications, this theory work has required several communications and a few more are expected to come. The “General Theory of Systemicity”, here “fourth part” describes largely the metadynamics systemicity at the origin of Earth and the “hatch” of Life with a progressive apparition of living organisms (pre-viruses…) capable to reproduce, to survive and evolve. This large transdisciplinary work describes the fluxes and moves that structure the complexity of the Universe, the Cosmo-planetary, terrestrial and biological metadynamics that are part of the universal atomic and molecular systemic cycles. For billions of years, fluxes and moves of the universal matter and forces participated in building up stellar systems, the Sun system, and the planet Earth on which a flourishing phenomenon called Life found an adaptable sustainability. Sets of meta-drivers, their systemicity with synergetic moves are sustaining a large number of cycles (water, rocks...) and are permanently adapting, changing environmental events, which occurrence values have to be observed in the short and long term. This 2011 communication stands for a large description of the "Early Earth and the origin of Life’s meta-dynamics systemicity". It also stresses the observation of both the “molecule cycle” and the “universality of metabolism”. In the conclusion, it assumes the fundamental objectivity, evidence and realism of a "General Theory of metadynamics Systemicity"

The "Cosmo-Planetary and Terrestrial Meta-Dynamics Systemicity"

Ever since 1996, J.-J. Blanc, as the author, made an extensive research on "Systems science", which induced to his developing a new systemic paradigm in terms of a transdisciplinary approach to "Living systems" that he named “The Bioethism” (see note 1). It is meant to support the acquisition of a large understanding of living systems' origin, of the meaning of their natural structure and their adaptive behaviors, their bonds and evolution trends while permanently interacting with environmental events for survival. These actions-reactions from ago-antagonistic signals and stimuli within their body milieu, their ecosystemic and sociosystemic environments are closely linked with and affected by - a) their specific individual and social status and the diversity of species behavioral evolutionary trends - b) cosmo-planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamic forces. The survey of the different scientific disciplines development concerned with the actual "Science of Systems", shows that the living systems' knowledge of reality is, for too many scientists, in developing their works in the strict philosophy of human "reason" (logic and metaphysics). Excepted, of course, are those disciplines where individual and societal emotion is a paramount understanding of pragmatic survival rules. An adequate learning for a sustainable development of societies, respecting the required survival diversity needs is here based on new general theories the author called “The general meta-dynamics systemicity" and "Life intra-dynamics systemicity” and "The general systemicity". Because they rely on the entire body of forces and dynamics that made and makes physicochemical moves to exist and sustain, by essence the biological ones, and behavioural processes adapting to the permanency of change. At the Life's level of survival intra-dynamics systemicity, the "cosmic meta-dynamics" of universal forces and moves participate in the physicochemical dynamics of the biological world of which systemicity is based on retroactivity building up a temporal sustainability. Consequently, an overview upon the entire body of universal interdependent bio-physicochemical mechanisms, moves, processes and streams interwoven within "3D networks", shows that survival abilities and performances are epigenetically provided from both the convergence of cosmo-planetary forces (magnetic, gravitational…) and terrestrial conditions (geologic, geochemical, geophysical, geo-climatic…), which, retroactively, sustain the Earth and by extension the biological world of individuals and societal systems to exist and survive within a dynamic equilibrium inevitably interdependent of chaotic effects of the thermodynamic entropy. My work, requiring several communications, it was decided to divide its development into different "scientific principles" chapters that support the complexity of cosmo-planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamics systemicity. Their effects are combining interactive physicochemical forces and moves, as emergent results generally referred to their synergistic, their dynamical coordination supporting the meta-drivers systemicity. A few paragraphs of will prepare another communication about "The Life's intra-bio-dynamics systemicity" and the provisional conclusion assumes the future description of the "Theory of a General Systemicity"

” The General Theory of Dynamics Systemicity” Part 7

"The Bioethism paradigm" (acronym for Biology-Ethology, ecology - Humanism) fosters universal specificities relative to the complexity of Life's processing, which in form of open systems, appeared on Earth from biochemical components and survival proprieties within propitious physicochemical environmental forces (J.-J. Blanc 1996).For reference, the author’s past proceedings were developed - part after part since 2004 - as the structure and chapters of a “General Theory of Metadynamics Systemicity”. Its building blocks are being centered on the Universe diversity of x-dynamics: petadynamics teradynamics, gigadynamics’, metadynamics’, dynamics’, microdynamics’ and nanodynamics’ systemicity.  The set of X-dynamics are, in physics, multipliers defined in powers of 1015 to 10-6, proceeding in increments of three orders of magnitude (10' or 1`000), such as: peta, giga, meta, kilo, micro, nano...The publication of these works is meant to support the acquisition of a large transdisciplinary understanding of the “x-dynamics’ systemicity world” that sustains the whole evolution of the Universe system’s components as well as those of living entities (things, objects, individuals), while perceiving and experiencing sets of forces and fluxes. This is why the theory of Systemicity emerged from synergies as applying the principles of “The Bioethism Transdisciplinary Paradigm of Universal Systems” down to ”Living systems” both having their specific temporal survival” that the author J.-J. Blanc developed since 1996.-           “Systemicity” is a notion that surges from interrelation, interaction, intrication…within interdependent synergies. The systemicity of atomic and molecular cycles has made and sustains both cosmic systems and Life’s cycles on planet Earth along differential time periods (trillion of light-years to less than hours) and their specific retroactivity.-          Intrication is the quantum entanglement of a physical phenomenon that occurs when pairs or groups of particles are generated or interact in ways such that the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently — instead, a quantum state may be given for the system as a whole, in other ways its metabolism status.-          Measurements of physical properties such as position, momentum, spin, polarization, etc. performed on entangled particles are found to be appropriately correlated.The different parts of “X-dynamics Systemicity” are developed through a new “reading grid of natural structures and behaviors of entities, objects and things as adapting from “neighboring’” within “neighborhoods” (ecosystems) where they specifically cope with endogenous and exogenous events and forces inducing to the retroactive temporal restructuring of  their structure and behavioral aptitudes (as in part 6).Neighboring is “to associate in a neighborly way, to communicate with, to live side by side with, and to overlook and look out. Biological molecule sequences, while neighboring, are participating in the structuring and the evolution of “cosmobjects”(JJB), organism, species and entities along their reproduction abilities. It infers nature and extent of selective forces, those driving the evolving shaping of atom sets and organism genes (mutations). In other words, as in this part 7, “survival means” possess diverse perception, memory and experience tools that empower their adaptability to the permanency of all things to happen and change, i.e.:  they possess means as how to “give sense to things around from the interpretation of what’s they perceive. The choice of the sense given may be lethal or propitious to their surviving. In order to exist, both objects and living creatures expressions are replicating and evolve thanks to their perception and feeling survival tools within global, glocal and local areas (ecosystems) and by their natural structures and behavioral components which shape some form of sytemicity processes that sustain their survival. Resulting actions and gene mutations are permanently changing both the endogen milieu and external environmental ecosystems metabolism and components quality (e.g.: means used from vision interpreting [1]the formation of a move or a feeling driving to its systemicity result like fear; the gravity effect of two masses as sustaining a balanced equilibrium, flying away…).Subsequently, through ecosystems’ 3D multi-layers, from proto-organisms to humans, their individualities take on specific social traits and behavioral statuses that account for the diversity of species to get developed and/or to go extinct. For example, when the Earth became a "snowball" from a nearly total glaciation (-600 Mo/y), the survival of some neighboring bacteria and micro-organisms escaping the drastic extinction of most species, conversely perceiving ways of adaptation, boosted up an extraordinary explosion of marine species bearing quite new functions (- 545Mo/y), that then after volcanic holes progressively reheated areas of the planet and boosted some organisms population revivals from the systemicity of sets of interrelated metadynamics and their symbiotic outputs propitious with adaptation and evolution.The Universe’s global environment generates x-dynamics such as cosmic petadynamics (black holes? Black energy?), teradynamics, gigadynamics and metadynamics cycles... in form of systemic forces, fluxes and moves occur within immense gas and particles neighborhoods. Interrelated, they are some of the main physicochemical cosmic, galactic, stellar, planetary and terrestrial feedback synergies from which x-dynamics systemicity retroactions emerge (i.e. rock cycles). Sets of systemicity results make atoms and molecules to participate in the structuring of matter and cosmic objects (nebulae, baby stars, stars and planets, waters and rocks), within a molecular world that originated from and after the “Big Bang” a nd the role of aggregation.Furthermore, the physicochemical neighboring conditions for planet Earth to stabilize within the “Sun’s green belt” was a thermodynamics and environmental balanced state issued from the presence of the Moon’s mass aggregation at the right distance so as to become propitious for Life to “hatch” (gravity and tidal forces). Such favorable position, sustaining the Earth and Life’s evolution by the development of x-dynamic adaptive pathways, is in some sort of a synchronistic status with universal objects survival cycles, forces, fluxes, moves and matter that as “perceiving, giving sense and experiencing things” is highly evolving as to experiencing things” in several synergetic manners, (e.g. cosmic objects feeling, plants natural and emotional intelligence. . .). Perception tools are physicochemical and organic features treating signals- like neurons- or other microtubule as protein structures and links around brain networks. Microtubules are a component of the cytoskeleton[2], found throughout the cytoplasm. The microtubule can dynamically switch between growing and shrinking phases in this region (“search and capture model”), a matter of neighboring milieu.Life as a whole and living entities, while neighboring around, are confronted with gravitation, electromagnetism, chemical and physical phenomena, and particularly with temperature and the “thermodynamics of entropy”. Filtering their milieu symptoms and their environmental events signals, living creatures develop means of perception in ways their inner systems and organs such as the immune one, emotional brain with amygdala and reptilian area or vision with eyes are well fit drivers for supporting their survival behaviors.The neighboring areas (mille-feuille as 4D-networks) are diverse but concomitant producing forces and fluxes that are dynamical drivers within the diverse ecosystems. Their systemicity results from actions of coalescence, conjunction, co-evolution, convergence, symbiosis, percolation, phase transition or threshold output, neighborhood adaptation, etc. Universally, these actions and mechanisms concern atomic, molecular and physicochemical world’s permanently provoking feedback that drives the evolution of systemicity cycles and perception means. Because of the development of similarities in unrelated matters or organisms present in similar environments, a balanced equilibrium is necessary to sustain the whole of things to survive temporally. The disappearance of a link along a food chain completely disorganizes the ecosystem’s metabolism endangering its sustainability.Specific bonds and traits of structures and behaviors, as well as evolution trends for “surviving objects and living creatures” require a certain knowledge and a memory about actions-reactions (drivers) from ago-antagonistic signals and stimuli in order to give the propitious answer to an adaptation, then evolution of things. Issued from ecosystemic and socio-systemic metabolism and environmental statuses (geophysics, climate, predator preys networks of food chains…), these signals sustain things thanks to the x-dynamics systemic retroactivity results reigning about from the convergence of multi-symbiosis.A "Closer Look at Instincts", in animals, has the inherent tendency to engage spontaneously into particular pattern of behaviors. Examples of this include a dog shaking after it gets wet, a sea turtle seeking out the ocean after hatching, or a bird migrating before the winter season.This part of the theory, the 7th one, describes the major dynamics that symbiotically pilot “key drivers” that represent the general act of “symbiotic perception”. This act, occurring at the cosmos and biological objects levels, is inducing to different physicochemical interactions and laws (gravity…), prolonged down to the Earth major dynamic drivers that induce to its survival as well as survival specifications, adaptations and an immense evolution n of bushy Life’s species which hatched from water, oxygen, carbo dioxide, hydrogen and nitrogen…showing the four functions of such an happening:­       Proteins: Amino acids, protection of the body,­       Lipid: Fats, store energy and build up cell membrane,­       Carbohydrates: Sugar, provides physicochemical energy,­       Nucleic Acid: DNA, RNA, provide an organism the knowledge of basic functions and genetics functions.One may easily understand here that human sociology shows such the diversity of neighboring comportments and effects issued from these basic perception outfits, both being endogenous and exogenous. Observing then, that the various effects of systemicity are universally giving sense to what happens, driving the dynamics systemicity results at survival tools to induce to with adaptation and evolution necessities. Thanks to perception capacities (instinct, intelligence,) and a variety of memories (short, long term…) from which permanently emerge the symbiosis of differential qualities capable to give sense to things then to a survival timeline.

THE GENERAL THEORY OF META-DYNAMICS SYSTEMICITY

Ever since 1996, J.-J. Blanc, the author, made an extensive research on "Systems science" that induced to his developing a new systemic paradigm in terms of a transdisciplinary approach to "Living systems" that he named “The Bioethism” (see note 1). It is meant to support the acquisition of a large understanding of living systems' origin, of their natural structure and their adaptive behaviors meanings. Their species bonds and evolution trends, while permanently interacting with environmental events for survival, require actions-reactions from ago-antagonistic signals and stimuli. Endogenous within their body milieu and exogenous while confronted with conditions of ecosystemic and sociosystemic environments, living beings are closely linked with and affected by - a) cosmo-planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamic forces, - b) their specific biological individuality and social traits and statuses accounting for the biodiversity of species behavioral and evolutionary trends emerging from the set of the biological metadynamics systemicity. For example the drastic extinction of species, except some bacteria, when the Earth became a "snowball" from a nearly total glaciation (-600 Mo/y) and, on the contrary, an extraordinary explosion of marine species bearing new functions (- 545Mo/y) The survey in the different scientific disciplines concerned with the actual "Science of Systems", shows too many scientists developing the living systems' knowledge of reality in the strict philosophy of human "reason" (logic and metaphysics) under an anthropocentric practice. Excepted are, of course, those works directly concerned with biological disciplines, biochemistry and physicochemical physiology and when individual and societal emotions are taken into consideration so as to support a paramount and pragmatic understanding of survival rules and necessities. An adequate learning for a sustainable development of societies, respecting the required survival diversity needs, is here based on a new general theory the author called “The general theory of meta-dynamics systemicity". A new theory that relies on the whole body of forces and dynamics that made and makes physicochemical and biological moves and objects to exist and sustain at the different dynamics levels of the Universe. By essence, the dynamics levels are: atomic and cosmic, galactic, stellar, planetary, terrestrial and biological. Though diverse in structure and mechanism, they are all interrelated and provoke intricate moves and fluxes of differential retroactions from which emerge various object "postures" (behaviors). Bound to adapting their behaviors to permanent environmental changes, objects (eg. the planet Earth) and living beings survive within the constraints and effects of dynamics differential retroactivity. These feedbacks, in cycles, induce to the repetition of moves and fluxes, the "meta-dynamics systemicity", a term analogous to "velocity", referring to dynamical behaviors. However, systemicity must be understood as successive and/or parallel retroactive ago-antagonistic, convergent differentials moves making emerge whole bodies of adaptive results while confronted and coevolving with environmental changes. At Life's level, the set of meta/intra-dynamics systemicity sustains survival at biological, physiological and psychological intricate sublevels. Consubstantial and interrelated with the cosmic , galactic, stellar, planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamics, the biological "metadynamics systemicity" is participating in the whole of universal systemic effects feedbacks. Thereby, universal forces and fluxes permanently influence physicochemical reactive dynamics and permanently affect the biological world within its intra-dynamics systemicity moves. A world that is retroactive from emergent results affecting living creatures' survival choices so as to adapt their behaviors supporting their temporal sustainability. Consequently, an overview upon the entire body of universal interdependent bio-physicochemical mechanisms, moves, processes and streams, interwoven within "3D networks", shows that survival abilities and performances are epigenetically provided with meta-dynamics resulting effects of systemicity. The convergence of cosmo-planetary forces (thermodynamic, magnetic, gravitational…) and terrestrial conditions (geologic, geochemical, geophysical, geo-climatic…) is retroactively sustaining the Earth and the living's own meta-dynamics survival means (biotope equilibrium, local ecosystems biodiversity, food chains,… sustainable behaviors, reproduction , …) thanks to processes that have a "re-seeding" ability. Furthermore, the biological world of individuals and societal systems (family, group,…) cannot survive but within dynamic equilibriums that are inevitably interdependent. Social groups are subject to chaotic effects of the thermodynamic entropy and by their meta-dynamics, intradynamics and subdynamics drives, which make permanently emerge and temporally sustain differential behaviors. This work, having required several communications, describes largely here the general systemicity of principles that support living beings survival. A large work that refers to the complexity of cosmo-planetary, terrestrial and (in this part three) the biological meta-dynamics systemicity, a meta-driver that participated in the origin of Life. And, for billion of years, participated in the building up of the Earth's and a Life's adaptable sustainability confronted with fluxes and moves of universal forces. The set of meta-drivers with synergetic moves sustaining systemicity cycles, were and are permanently adapting to changing environmental events occurrence, which values have to be viewed in the short and long term. At the stage of this work process, the communication stands for "The biological meta-dynamics systemicity" and, in the conclusion, assumes the fundamental objectivity and realism of a "General Theory of Systemicity"