Analysis of the effect of hemodialysis on peripheral and central arterial pressure waveforms

Analysis of the effect of hemodialysis on peripheral and central arterial pressure waveforms.BackgroundArterial stiffening is very pronounced in renal patients. Carotid artery stiffening is a powerful predictor of future cardiovascular mortality, and measures of arterial compliance correlate much better with left ventricular mass (LVM) in dialysis patients than does brachial artery blood pressure (BP). The aim of our study was to describe the influence of a hemodialysis (HD) session on arterial cushioning function and to correlate the potential different types of behavior with echocardiographic derived parameters.MethodsRadial artery pressure waveforms were measured and recorded noninvasively by applanation tonometry in 51 healthy patients on regular three times weekly HD. The data were then converted into aortic pressure waveforms using a regression equation (SphymoCor™ apparatus). Measurements were done pre- and post-HD in order to ascertain the effect of a single HD session on arterial hemodynamics. The augmentation index (AGI; the difference between early and late pressure peaks divided by the pulse pressure amplitude) was used as an index for vascular compliance. Reproducibility was assessed in 20 young healthy subjects by determining the aortic pulse wave augmentation index twice from radial artery BP measurements one minute apart. Intraobserver error was 2.4%. For 10 dialysis patients similarly studied, the intraobserver error was 1.6%.ResultsAGI was correlated with subjects' height (r = -0.37, P = 0.009), weight (r = -0.41, P = 0.002), and BP levels: radial systolic BP (r = 0.33, P = 0.018), radial diastolic BP (r = 0.29, P = 0.036), and central systolic BP (r = 0.51, P < 0.001). Comparing the pre- with the post-HD AGI values, four patterns of evolution became apparent: (1) The AGI was negative before the HD session and became even more negative afterward (N = 3 out of 51). (2) The AGI was positive before the HD session but became negative after dialysis (N = 19 out of 51). (3) The AGI was positive before the HD session and, although diminished afterward, remained positive (N = 23 out of 51). (4) The AGI was positive before the HD session and increased afterward (N = 6 out of 51). We also found that in some patients, AGI remained at lower than predialysis levels for at least 24 hours. Significant relationships between echocardiographic parameters and pulse wave contour (PWC) variables included pre-HD AGI and LVM (r = 0.47, P < 0.001). There was better correlation between LVM and derived predialysis aortic systolic BP (r = 0.56, P < 0.001) than measured brachial (peripheral) systolic BP (r = 0.35, P = 0.04). Patients whose waveform remained abnormal (AGI remained positive) after HD had a more dilated LV (LV-EDD = 52.07 ± 3.48 mm) than did those patients for whom HD restored “normal” arterial hemodynamics (LV-EDD 46.86 ± 4.06 mm, P < 0.05).ConclusionsA standard HD session profoundly affected aortic BP waveform characteristics, with a reduction in wave reflection in 88% of patients. However, restoration by HD of a normal aortic waveform was unusual. Patients whose waveform remained abnormal after HD had larger more dilated LV chambers than did those patients for whom HD restored “normal” arterial hemodynamics

Media as challenger of state genocide

The media and state leadership have a strong and inseparable link in the history of the media. In totalitarian regimes, the government finances and controls the media, in regimes with apartheid elements the government closes the media that does not like, persecutes and kills journalists. In democratic societies, state leadership and the media have a financial connection in most of the cases. This paper will address a very specific media situation, that of Montenegro in 1999. Montenegro was part of the former Yugoslavia, which was committing genocide against Kosovo Albanians. But the main media in Montenegro, starting with the public broadcaster, the radio as part of it, and the main newspapers, marked a rare case when the media does not obey the government but takes the side of people in need - Kosovar refugees who, fleeing extermination, sought refuge in Montenegro

Positioning novel biologicals in CKD-mineral and bone disorders

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD), the histologic bone lesions of chronic kidney disease (CKD), is now included in a wider syndrome with laboratory abnormalities of mineral metabolism and extra-skeletal calcifications or CKD-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD), to highlight the increased burden of mortality. Aging people, frequently identified as early CKD, could suffer from either the classical age-related osteoporosis (OP) or ROD. Distinguishing between these two bone diseases may not be easy without bone biopsy. In any case, besides classical therapies for ROD, nephrologists are now challenged by the possibility of using new drugs developed for OP. Importantly, while therapies for ROD mostly aim at controlling parathyroid secretion with bone effects regarded as indirect, new drugs for OP directly modulate bone cells activity. Thus, their action could be useful in specific types of ROD. Parathyroid hormone therapy, which is anabolic in OP, could be useful in renal patients with low turnover bone disease. Denosumab, the monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANK-L) that inhibits osteoclast activity and proliferation, could be beneficial in cases with high turnover bone. Use of romosozumab, the monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, which both stimulates osteoblasts and inhibits osteoclasts, could allow both anabolic and anti-resorptive effects. However, we should not forget the systemic role now attributed to CKD-MBD. In fact, therapies targeting bone cells activity could also result in unpredicted extra-bone effects and affect cardiovascular outcomes. In conclusion, the new biologicals established for OP could be useful in renal patients with either OP or ROD. In addition, their potential non-bone effects warrant investigation

Vascular calcification: A stiff challenge for the nephrologist Does preventing bone disease cause arterial disease

Vascular calcification: A stiff challenge for the nephrologists—Does preventing bone disease cause arterial disease? There has been an explosion of interest in vascular calcification in the last 5 years. Four key “germinal” findings have fallen onto very fertile soil. First, on the background of an increasing cardiovascular disease burden it has been found that at least cross-sectionally, and in a limited fashion prospectively, achieved dialysis plasma phosphate levels are linked to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Second, there are increasing reports of calcific uremic arteriolopathy in Australia and the United States. Third, we know know that the mechanical properties of the carotid artery, and the aorta, have a profound influence on survival for dialysis patients. Vascular calcification itself (as assessed by x-ray films and ultrasound) has been linked to aortic stiffness. Fourth, increasing numbers of studies are showing extremely extensive coronary artery calcification (CAC) in dialysis patients, even at a young age. From these apparently unlinked observations the following assertion has been posited—that in the widespread (over) use of calcium-containing oral phosphate binders (OPB) to prevent uremic osteodystrophy in our dialysis population we have unwittingly accelerated widespread uremic vasculopathy and thereby contributed to premature cardiovascular mortality.It is the purpose of this article to discuss vascular calcification (and particularly CAC) in dialysis patients as we understand it today. We will review the published series, with special reference to the Sevelamer Treat to Goal trial and also discuss the new Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K-DOQI) guidelines on the use of phosphate binders in chronic kidney disease