9 research outputs found

    Percent difference in the area of different suitability category between RCP 4.5, RCP and 6.0 and RCP 8.0 and current scenario for <i>A</i>.<i>fulica</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Percent difference in the area of different suitability category between RCP 4.5, RCP and 6.0 and RCP 8.0 and current scenario for <i>A</i>.<i>fulica</i>.</p

    Area with suitability scores under different climate scenarios.

    No full text
    <p>The percentage is given in the parenthesis. The value less the 0.10 is not given.</p

    Percent number of records of <i>A</i>.<i>fulica</i> invasion along the altitudinal gradient.

    No full text
    <p>Percent number of records of <i>A</i>.<i>fulica</i> invasion along the altitudinal gradient.</p

    Environmental Data used for ENM for <i>A</i>. <i>fulica</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The highlighted variables were included in the model after testing for correlation between variables.</p

    Pearson’s correlation between number of <i>A</i>. <i>fulica</i> records and climatic factors.

    No full text
    <p>*P<0.05,</p><p>**P<0.01,</p><p>df = 10</p><p>Pearson’s correlation between number of <i>A</i>. <i>fulica</i> records and climatic factors.</p

    Area under curve for training and test points under different scenarios.

    No full text
    <p>Area under curve for training and test points under different scenarios.</p
    corecore