3 research outputs found

    Additional file 1: of Genomic prediction using subsampling

    No full text
    Results presented by individual dataset Figure S1. Time to fit the model (y axis) varying the subsampling method (x axis). Figure S2. Prediction ability (y axis) varying the subsampling method (x axis). Methods include Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) with regular sampler, and SBMC subsampling from 25 to 100%, with and without replacement. Figure S3. Mean squared prediction error (y axis) varying the subsampling method (x axis). Methods include Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) with regular sampler, and SBMC subsampling from 25 to 100%, with and without replacement. Figure S4. Bias (y axis) varying the subsampling method (x axis). Methods include Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) with regular sampler, and SBMC subsampling from 25 to 100%, with and without replacement. (DOCX 232 kb

    Selected examples of the ability to differentiate between catfish allelic variants and gene duplicates (paralogues) using both blue catfish and channel catfish sequences

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Towards the ictalurid catfish transcriptome: generation and analysis of 31,215 catfish ESTs"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/8/177</p><p>BMC Genomics 2007;8():177-177.</p><p>Published online 18 Jun 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1906771.</p><p></p> Highly similar channel catfish sequences (Channel) and at least one blue catfish sequence (Blue) sharing the same BLAST identity were subjected to phylogenetic analysis. The topological stability of the neighbor joining trees was evaluated by 1000 bootstrapping replications, and the bootstrapping values are indicated by numbers at the nodes. Channel catfish and blue catfish genes placed into the same clade indicate that the additional, related channel catfish sequence is likely a paralogue rather than an allelic variant
    corecore