DataSheet_1_The risk factors and early predictive model of hematotoxicity after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.docx

Hematotoxicity is the most common long-term adverse event after chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Here, a total of 71 patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) were used to develop an early hematotoxicity predictive model and verify the accuracy of this model. The incidences of early hematotoxicity at 3 month following CAR-T infusion in B-ALL and LBCL were 45.5% and 38.5%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was an independent risk factor affecting early hematotoxicity. The analysis between the peak cytokine levels and early hematotoxicity suggested that tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were closely associated with early hematotoxicity. Then, an early predictive model of hematotoxicity was constructed based on the peak contents of TNF-α and CRP. This model could diagnose early hematotoxicity with positive predictive values of 87.7% and 85.0% in training and validation cohorts, respectively. Lastly, we constructed the nomogram for clinical practice to predict the risk of early hematotoxicity, which performed well compared with the observed probability. This early predictive model is instrumental in the risk stratification of CAR-T recipients with hematotoxicity and early intervention for high-risk patients.</p

Table4_Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.doc

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated.Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords “radiotherapy,” “immune checkpoint inhibitors,” and “non-small cell lung cancer” from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias.Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively].Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.</p

Presentation1_Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PPT

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated.Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords “radiotherapy,” “immune checkpoint inhibitors,” and “non-small cell lung cancer” from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias.Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively].Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.</p

Table1_Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.DOCX

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated.Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords “radiotherapy,” “immune checkpoint inhibitors,” and “non-small cell lung cancer” from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias.Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively].Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.</p

Table2_Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.DOCX

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated.Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords “radiotherapy,” “immune checkpoint inhibitors,” and “non-small cell lung cancer” from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias.Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively].Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.</p

Presentation2_Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PPT

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated.Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords “radiotherapy,” “immune checkpoint inhibitors,” and “non-small cell lung cancer” from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias.Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively].Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.</p

Table3_Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without radiotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.DOCX

Background and purpose: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), their efficacy is limited. Meanwhile, recent reports suggest that radiotherapy (RT) can activate the systemic antitumor immune response by increasing the release of antigens from tumor tissues. Therefore, in patients with mNSCLC treated with ICIs, investigations were performed to determine whether the addition of RT improved the outcomes. Furthermore, the adverse events rate was evaluated.Methods and materials: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched using the keywords “radiotherapy,” “immune checkpoint inhibitors,” and “non-small cell lung cancer” from the date of inception to 2 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonRCTs (NRCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of RT combined with ICIs versus ICIs alone in metastatic NSCLC were assessed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were abscopal response rate (ARR), abscopal control rate (ACR), adverse events rate, and pneumonia rate. The analyses were conducted using the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, whereas funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias.Results: In 15 clinical studies, 713 patients received RT combined with ICIs and 1,275 patients received only ICIs. With regard to PFS and OS, the hazard ratios of RT combined with ICIs were 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) and 0.72 (0.63, 0.82), respectively. In terms of ARR and ACR, the odds ratios (ORs) of RT combined with ICIs were 1.94 (1.19, 3.17) and 1.79 (1.08, 2.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses based on study type (RCT/NRCT), RT target (intracranial/extracranial), number of RT sites (single site), previous ICI resistance (yes/no), and sequencing of RT and ICIs (concurrent/post-RT ICIs) revealed that the addition of RT significantly prolonged PFS and OS. However, subgroup analyses based on radiation dose/fractionation indicated that the addition of hypofractionated RT significantly prolonged OS but not PFS. When grouped according to the level of PD-L1 expression, the addition of RT prolonged PFS only in patients who were PD-L1-negative. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of ARR and ACR signified that the combination therapy resulted in better local control of lesions outside the irradiation field in the hypofractionated RT, extracranial RT, and ICI-naïve subgroups. In terms of adverse events, the addition of RT did not significantly increase the adverse events rate but was associated with a higher pneumonia rate [OR values were 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) and 1.76 (1.12, 2.77), respectively].Conclusion: Meta-analysis of existing data suggests that the addition of RT can significantly prolong PFS and OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving ICIs. In addition to lesions in the irradiation field, RT can improve the local control rate of lesions outside the irradiation field via immune activation. Combination therapy does not increase the overall risk of adverse reactions, except for pneumonia.</p

Global, regional, and national burden of respiratory tract cancers and associated risk factors from 1990 to 2019 a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

BackgroundPrevention, control, and treatment of respiratory tract cancers are important steps towards achieving target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-a one-third reduction in premature mortality due to non-communicable diseases by 2030. We aimed to provide global, regional, and national estimates of the burden of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer and larynx cancer and their attributable risks from 1990 to 2019.MethodsBased on the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 methodology, we evaluated the incidence, mortality, years lived with disability, years of life lost, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) of respiratory tract cancers (ie, tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer and larynx cancer). Deaths from tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer and larynx cancer attributable to each risk factor were estimated on the basis of risk exposure, relative risks, and the theoretical minimum risk exposure level input from 204 countries and territories, stratified by sex and Socio-demographic Index (SDI). Trends were estimated from 1990 to 2019, with an emphasis on the 2010-19 period.FindingsGlobally, there were 2·26 million (95% uncertainty interval 2·07 to 2·45) new cases of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer, and 2·04 million (1·88 to 2·19) deaths and 45·9 million (42·3 to 49·3) DALYs due to tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer in 2019. There were 209 000 (194 000 to 225 000) new cases of larynx cancer, and 123 000 (115 000 to 133 000) deaths and 3·26 million (3·03 to 3·51) DALYs due to larynx cancer globally in 2019. From 2010 to 2019, the number of new tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer cases increased by 23·3% (12·9 to 33·6) globally and the number of larynx cancer cases increased by 24·7% (16·0 to 34·1) globally. Global age-standardised incidence rates of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer decreased by 7·4% (-16·8 to 1·6) and age-standardised incidence rates of larynx cancer decreased by 3·0% (-10·5 to 5·0) in males over the past decade; however, during the same period, age-standardised incidence rates in females increased by 0·9% (-8·2 to 10·2) for tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer and decreased by 0·5% (-8·4 to 8·1) for larynx cancer. Furthermore, although age-standardised incidence and death rates declined in both sexes combined from 2010 to 2019 at the global level for tracheal, bronchus, lung and larynx cancers, some locations had rising rates, particularly those on the lower end of the SDI range. Smoking contributed to an estimated 64·2% (61·9-66·4) of all deaths from tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer and 63·4% (56·3-69·3) of all deaths from larynx cancer in 2019. For males and for both sexes combined, smoking was the leading specific risk factor for age-standardised deaths from tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer per 100 000 in all SDI quintiles and GBD regions in 2019. However, among females, household air pollution from solid fuels was the leading specific risk factor in the low SDI quintile and in three GBD regions (central, eastern, and western sub-Saharan Africa) in 2019.InterpretationThe numbers of incident cases and deaths from tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer and larynx cancer increased globally during the past decade. Even more concerning, age-standardised incidence and death rates due to tracheal, bronchus, lung cancer and larynx cancer increased in some populations-namely, in the lower SDI quintiles and among females. Preventive measures such as smoking control interventions, air quality management programmes focused on major air pollution sources, and widespread access to clean energy should be prioritised in these settings

The global burden of adolescent and young adult cancer in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

The global burden of adolescent and young adult cancer in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 201

The burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors by state in the USA, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Background: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2021 provides a comprehensive assessment of health and risk factor trends at global, regional, national, and subnational levels. This study aims to examine the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors in the USA and highlight the disparities in health outcomes across different states. Methods: GBD 2021 analysed trends in mortality, morbidity, and disability for 371 diseases and injuries and 88 risk factors in the USA between 1990 and 2021. We used several metrics to report sources of health and health loss related to specific diseases, injuries, and risk factors. GBD 2021 methods accounted for differences in data sources and biases. The analysis of levels and trends for causes and risk factors within the same computational framework enabled comparisons across states, years, age groups, and sex. GBD 2021 estimated years lived with disability (YLDs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs; the sum of years of life lost to premature mortality and YLDs) for 371 diseases and injuries, years of life lost (YLLs) and mortality for 288 causes of death, and life expectancy and healthy life expectancy (HALE). We provided estimates for 88 risk factors in relation to 155 health outcomes for 631 risk–outcome pairs and produced risk-specific estimates of summary exposure value, relative health risk, population attributable fraction, and risk-attributable burden measured in DALYs and deaths. Estimates were produced by sex (male and female), age (25 age groups from birth to ≥95 years), and year (annually between 1990 and 2021). 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were generated for all final estimates as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles values of 500 draws (ie, 500 random samples from the estimate's distribution). Uncertainty was propagated at each step of the estimation process. Findings: We found disparities in health outcomes and risk factors across US states. Our analysis of GBD 2021 highlighted the relative decline in life expectancy and HALE compared with other countries, as well as the impact of COVID-19 during the first 2 years of the pandemic. We found a decline in the USA's ranking of life expectancy from 1990 to 2021: in 1990, the USA ranked 35th of 204 countries and territories for males and 19th for females, but dropped to 46th for males and 47th for females in 2021. When comparing life expectancy in the best-performing and worst-performing US states against all 203 other countries and territories (excluding the USA as a whole), Hawaii (the best-ranked state in 1990 and 2021) dropped from sixth-highest life expectancy in the world for males and fourth for females in 1990 to 28th for males and 22nd for females in 2021. The worst-ranked state in 2021 ranked 107th for males (Mississippi) and 99th for females (West Virginia). 14 US states lost life expectancy over the study period, with West Virginia experiencing the greatest loss (2·7 years between 1990 and 2021). HALE ranking declines were even greater; in 1990, the USA was ranked 42nd for males and 32nd for females but dropped to 69th for males and 76th for females in 2021. When comparing HALE in the best-performing and worst-performing US states against all 203 other countries and territories, Hawaii ranked 14th highest HALE for males and fifth for females in 1990, dropping to 39th for males and 34th for females in 2021. In 2021, West Virginia—the lowest-ranked state that year—ranked 141st for males and 137th for females. Nationally, age-standardised mortality rates declined between 1990 and 2021 for many leading causes of death, most notably for ischaemic heart disease (56·1% [95% UI 55·1–57·2] decline), lung cancer (41·9% [39·7–44·6]), and breast cancer (40·9% [38·7–43·7]). Over the same period, age-standardised mortality rates increased for other causes, particularly drug use disorders (878·0% [770·1–1015·5]), chronic kidney disease (158·3% [149·6–167·9]), and falls (89·7% [79·8–95·8]). We found substantial variation in mortality rates between states, with Hawaii having the lowest age-standardised mortality rate (433·2 per 100 000 [380·6–493·4]) in 2021 and Mississippi having the highest (867·5 per 100 000 [772·6–975·7]). Hawaii had the lowest age-standardised mortality rates throughout the study period, whereas Washington, DC, experienced the most improvement (a 40·7% decline [33·2–47·3]). Only six countries had age-standardised rates of YLDs higher than the USA in 2021: Afghanistan, Lesotho, Liberia, Mozambique, South Africa, and the Central African Republic, largely because the impact of musculoskeletal disorders, mental disorders, and substance use disorders on age-standardised disability rates in the USA is so large. At the state level, eight US states had higher age-standardised YLD rates than any country in the world: West Virginia, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, and Arizona. Low back pain was the leading cause of YLDs in the USA in 1990 and 2021, although the age-standardised rate declined by 7·9% (1·8–13·0) from 1990. Depressive disorders (56·0% increase [48·2–64·3]) and drug use disorders (287·6% [247·9–329·8]) were the second-leading and third-leading causes of age-standardised YLDs in 2021. For females, mental health disorders had the highest age-standardised YLD rate, with an increase of 59·8% (50·6–68·5) between 1990 and 2021. Hawaii had the lowest age-standardised rates of YLDs for all sexes combined (12 085·3 per 100 000 [9090·8–15 557·1]), whereas West Virginia had the highest (14 832·9 per 100 000 [11 226·9–18 882·5]). At the national level, the leading GBD Level 2 risk factors for death for all sexes combined in 2021 were high systolic blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, and tobacco use. From 1990 to 2021, the age-standardised mortality rates attributable to high systolic blood pressure decreased by 47·8% (43·4–52·5) and for tobacco use by 5·1% (48·3%–54·1%), but rates increased for high fasting plasma glucose by 9·3% (0·4–18·7). The burden attributable to risk factors varied by age and sex. For example, for ages 15–49 years, the leading risk factors for death were drug use, high alcohol use, and dietary risks. By comparison, for ages 50–69 years, tobacco was the leading risk factor for death, followed by dietary risks and high BMI. Interpretation: GBD 2021 provides valuable information for policy makers, health-care professionals, and researchers in the USA at the national and state levels to prioritise interventions, allocate resources effectively, and assess the effects of health policies and programmes. By addressing socioeconomic determinants, risk behaviours, environmental influences, and health disparities among minority populations, the USA can work towards improving health outcomes so that people can live longer and healthier lives. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p