13 research outputs found
ã³ãŠãŠã³ ã·ã³ã ãã©ãã ãã·ã¥ ãšãŠã·ã ã ãœãŠã€ 㬠ã¿ã³ã¹ã€ ããžã§ãŠãã¥ãŠ ãã§ã¯ã ã¹ã€ã㊠ã ã¿ã€ããŠãã¯ã»ã€ ã ãªãšãã¹ ãšã€ãã§ãŠ
æ°Žçš²ã®æ¹æ°Žåå£äžçŽææ œå¹ã«ãããŠ,æçš®æ§åŒ(æ£æãšæ¡æ)䞊ã³ã«èè深床(5cmãš15cm)ãèåäŒæ§ã«åãŒã圱é¿ãåå Žè©Šéšã§æ€èšãããèè深床15cmåº(15cmåº)ã®æ£æåºãšæ¡æåºã®åäŒçšåºŠã¯åçšåºŠã§,ãããèè深床5cmåº(5cmåº)ã®æ£æåºãšæ¡æåºããé«ãã£ãã5cmåºã§ã¯æ¡æåºãäœã,æãèåäŒæ§ã匷ãã£ããæ¡æ15cmåºã¯,æ£æ15cmåºã«æ¯ã¹ãŠæŒãåãæµæå€ãšåŒãæãæµæå€ã¯é«ãã£ãã,å°äžéšçè²ãæºçã§ãã£ãããæ£æ15cmåºãšåçšåºŠã®åäŒã瀺ããã5cmåºã¯,çåèéææ°,æŒãåãæµæå€ããã³åŒãæãæµæå€ããå€æããŠ,æ ¹ã®æŽ»æ§ãæ ¹ã®ç©çç匷床ã®åäžãåäŒã軜æžãããã®ãšæšå¯ããããããã,æ£æ5cmåºã,æ¡æ5cmåºããããåäŒçšåºŠã倧ããã£ãã®ã¯,æ ªçŽäžã«ååžããæ ¹éãå°ãªãã£ãããšã«ãããã®ãšèãããããThe purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of tilling depth (i.e., 5cm and 15cm) and sowing styles (i.e., broadcast and row sowing) on the lodging tolerance of rice under direct underground sowing in flooded paddy field. Lodging degree of broadcast and row sowing at the 15cm tilling depth, were same level, but were higher than in broadcast and row sowing at the 5cm tilling depth. Lodging degree of row sowing at the 5cm tilling depth was lowest, namely, the lodging tolerance was most superior. At the 15cm tilling depth, the pushing resistance and the pulling resistance were higher in row sowing than in broadcast sowing, but the top growth in the row sowing was vigorous, therefore the lodging in the row and broadcast sowing were same level. In the 5cm tillimg depth, it was guessed that the elevation of root activity and strength has brought about the mitigation of lodging, as judged by the numbers of alive leaf sheath, pushing resistance and pulling resistance. But in the 5cm tilling depth, it was considered that the lodging tolerance in broadcast sowing was inferior, by reason that the roots of rice below the hill were scanty
ã¹ã€ã㊠ã ã¿ã³ã¹ã€ ããžã§ãŠãã¥ãŠ ãžã§ãŠã ãã§ã¯ã ã¶ã€ã〠ã ãªã±ã« ã«ã ã ãªã·ã¿ãªã· ãã€ã³ãŠã ã ãããã ãã€ã³ãŠã ã ã ã«ã³ã±ã€
çŽææ°Žçš²ã®æŒãåãæµæå€ã®æž¬å®ã«çšããããŠããåŸæ¥åã®æ©çš®(åäŒè©Šéšåš)ãšããžã¿ã«åŒã®ãã©ãŒã¹ã²ãŒãžã«ãã枬å®å€ã®æ¯èŒãè¡ããšãšãã«,æŒãåãæµæå€ãšåŒãæãæµæå€ãšã®é¢ä¿ã«ã€ããŠæ€èšããããã©ãŒã¹ã²ãŒãžã«ããæŒãåãæµæã®æž¬å®å€ã¯,åŸæ¥ã®åäŒè©Šéšåšã«ãã枬å®å€ãã倧ãããªã£ãã,1æ ªç©æ°ã3æ¬ä»¥äžã®æŒãåãæµæå€ãå°ããæ ªã®èšæž¬ãå¯èœã§ãã£ããäžæ¹,æŒãåãæµæå€ãšåŒãæãæµæå€ãšã®é¢ä¿ã¯,枬å®æ©çš®ã1æ ªç©æ°ã®çžéã«é¢ããã,äž¡è
ã®éã«ã¯ææãªé«ãæ£ã®çžé¢é¢ä¿ãååšã,ãããåŒãæãæµæå€ã¯åäŒææ°ãšææãªè² ã®çžé¢é¢ä¿ãèªããããããããã®çµæãã,ãã©ãŒã¹ã²ãŒãžã¯æŒãåãæµæå€ãå°ããæ ªãå«ã調æ»å¯Ÿè±¡ã«ã¯,åŸæ¥ã®åäŒè©Šéšåšããé«ã粟床ã§ã®èšæž¬ãå¯èœã§ããããš,䞊ã³ã«åŒãæãæµæå€ã¯æ ¹ã®åŒ·åºŠãè¡šãææšã®äžã€ãšããŠå©çšã§ããããšã瀺åããããThis experiment was conducted to compare the pushing resistance of direct-sowing rice, measured by two different methods, namely, prostrate tester (Daiki DIK7400) used at present and digital force gauge (SHIMPO FGX-5). Further, the relationship between the pushing resistance and the pulling resistance were studied. Pushing resistance, measured by two different methods, was higher in value by force gauge than by prostrate tester. Force gauge could measure pushing resistance in rice of low pushing-resistance, where panicle number per hill was less than three. A high positive correlation was found between pushing resistance and pulling resistance without distinction of measures and panicle number per hill. And the pushing resistance showed a high negative correlation with lodging index. From these results, if the pushing resistance of hill is very low, force gauge can measure pushing resistance with greater precision than by measurement with a prostrate tester. Further, it was suggested that the pulling resistance is available to use for one of index of root strength
ã³ãŠãŠã³ ã·ã³ã ã ãœãŠã€ 㬠ã«ã³ã¹ã€ ãžã«ãã ã¹ã€ã㊠ã ã³ã³ãªã§ãŠ ã ã¿ã€ããŠãã¯ã»ã€ ãã ã«ã³ã±ã€ ã ãªãšãã¹ ãšã€ãã§ãŠ
èè深床ã®çžéãæ¹æ°Žåå£äžçŽææ°Žçš²ã®è転ã³ååäŒæ§ã«åãŒã圱é¿ãæ ¹éãšã®é¢ä¿ãäžå¿ã«ãããæ œå¹ã§æ€èšããã5cmèèåºãš15cmèèåºãèšã,èè深床ã®èšå®ã¯åå£å
å¯åºŠã®çžé,ããªãã¡å
å¯åºŠã®äœãéšåãèèµ·å±€ãšã,ãã®äžå±€éšåãé«å¯åºŠç¶æ
ã®äžèèµ·å±€ãšãããä»åã®çµæã§ã¯,åäŒè§åºŠã¯äž¡åºã«å·®ã¯ãªã,TRçãå°ããããªãã¡,å°äžéšçè²ã«æ¯ã¹ãŠå°äžéšçè²ãè¯å¥œãªãã®ã»ã©èåäŒæ§ãåäžããããšãèªãããããåäŒè§åºŠã¯,èè深床ãæ·±ã15cmåºã§ã¯åå£æ·±å±€ã®åå£å¯åºŠãé«ãéšåã®æ ¹é·ãšææãªè² ã®çžé¢é¢ä¿ãèªãããããããã,èè深床ãæµ
ãæ ¹éãè¡šå±€ã«å€ãååžãã5cmåºã§ã¯,åå£è¡šå±€ã®æ ¹é·ãšææãªè² ã®çžé¢é¢ä¿ãèªããããã以äžã®ããã«,åºç©2é±éåŸã®ææã§ã¯èè深床ã®æµ
æ·±ãå®éã®åäŒã«åãŒã圱é¿ã¯ã¿ãããªãã£ãã,èè深床ã®çžéã«ããèåäŒæ§ã«é¢äžããæ ¹é·ã®ååžç¯å²ãç°ãªã£ããA soil-cultured, pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different tilling depth on the lodging tolerance of rice in direct sowing, with special reference to their root weight and length. The field tilling conditions of 5cm or 15cm depth were simulated in pots by the difference of soil filling density for the respective tilling depth, namely, a lower filling density for the tilled surface layer, and a higher one for the non-tilled basal layer. No difference was found in lodging angle between the two conditions. But it was found that the lower top-root ratio of the plants increased the lodging tolerance irrespective of the tilling conditions. In the 15cm tilling depth plot, root length density in the deepest layer was high and there was a close negative correlation with the lodging angle.In the 5cm tilling depth plot, more roots developed in soil surface and the root length density in the surface layer also correlated negatively with the lodging angle. Although the relation between tilling depth and lodging remained obscure two weeks after heading, the distribution of the root length within specific soil layers might have a significant role in the lodging tolerance of the plants
ã¿ã³ã¹ã€ãã§ã¯ãã³ã¹ã€ã㊠ã ãªã±ã« ã³ãŠã€ãã³ã²ã ã ãŠã 㬠ããŠãžã§ãŠãã³ã²ã ã ã·ã¥ãŠãªã§ãŠã«ã³ã¬ã³ã±ã€ã·ã ã ãªãšãã¹ ãšã€ãã§ãŠ
æ¹æ°ŽçŽææ°Žçš²ã«ãããŠ,é«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ãšåºçŸããªãã£ãåãã€ã®åéé¢é£åœ¢è³ªãæ¯èŒãããæçš®æ§åŒãç¹æãšã,èç«ã¡å¯åºŠ50æ¬/m2(äœèç«ã¡å¯åºŠ)ã®50æ¬åºããã³100æ¬/m2(é©æ£èç«ã¡å¯åºŠ)ã®100æ¬åºã®2åºãèšãããäž¡åºãšãé«äœåãã€ãå€ãåºçŸã,ãã®åºçŸæ°ã¯50æ¬åºã§78.5æ¬/m2ããã³100æ¬åºã§93.5æ¬/m2ã§ãã£ããäž¡åºãšãåºçŸããé«äœåãã€ã®æ®ã©ãbT3(æ¢èç¯ããåºçŸããåãã€ãbT1ãšã,æ±åºçã«ç€ºããåãã€äœ)ãšbT4ã§ãã£ããé«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ã®æ¹ã,åºçŸããªãã£ãåãã€ãã1ç©ç±Ÿæ°,1ç©çç±³éããã³ç»çæ©åãææã«å€§ããã£ããé«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ã®äžã§ã¯,bT4ãåºçŸããåãã€ã®æ¹ãbT3ãåºçŸããåãã€ãã,åéé¢é£åœ¢è³ªã倧ããã£ãããŸã,èæ°3æã®é«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ã®æ¹ãèæ°2æã®é«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ãã,1ç©ç±Ÿæ°,1ç©çç±³éããã³ç»çæ©åã倧ããåŸåãèŠããããé«äœåãã€èªèº«ã,bT4ã®æ¹ãbT3ãã,ãã¹ãŠã®åéé¢é£åœ¢è³ªã倧ãã,ããã«èæ°3æã®é«äœåãã€ã®æ¹ã,èæ°2æã®é«äœåãã€ããç»çæ©åãé€ãåéé¢é£åœ¢è³ªã倧ããåŸåã瀺ããã以äžã®çµæ,é«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ã¯,åºçŸããªãã£ãåãã€ãã1ç©ç±Ÿæ°,1ç©çç±³éããã³ç»çæ©åã倧ããããšãã,åºç©æåã®èç©çæ°Žåç©ãè±å¯ã§,ãããåºç©æåŸã®çæ°Žåç©çç£éãå€ããšæšå¯ãããããŸã,é«äœåãã€ãåºçŸããåãã€ã®åéé¢é£åœ¢è³ªã倧ããã»ã©,é«äœåãã€èªèº«ã®åéé¢é£åœ¢è³ªã倧ããããšãæãããšãªã£ããUsing hill sowing at 50 and 100seedlings/m2, the related yield characteristics of normal tillers (tillers with UNT appearance and tillers without UNT appearance) were compared with the appearance of upper nodal tillers (UNTs) in direct sowing in flooded paddy field rice. UNTs appeared in 50-seedling and 100-seedling plots. The numbers of UNTs per square meter were 78.5 (50-seedling plot) and 93.5 (100-seedling plot). Those with UNT appearance were almost all bT3 and bT4. The number of spikelets per panicle, the weight of brown rice per panicle, and the percentage of ripened grains of tillers with UNT appearance were significantly higher than those of tillers without UNT appearance. Yield characteristics of tillers of bT4 with appearance were higher than those of tillers of bT3 with appearance compared with the tillers with UNT appearance. The number of spikelets per panicle, the weight of brown rice per panicle, and the percentage of ripened grains of tillers of three-leaf UNTs were higher than for tillers of two-leaf UNTs. All related yield characteristics of the bT4 were higher than those of bT3. All related yield characteristics of the three-leaf UNTs were higher than those of the two-leaf UNTs. Therefore, because the number of spikelets per panicle, the weight of brown rice per panicle, and the percentage of ripened grains of the tillers with UNT appearance were higher than those of tillers without UNT appearance, tillers with UNT appearance showed abundant accumulated carbohydrates before the heading stage, and showed high production of carbohydrates after the heading stage. Results clarified that the related yield characteristics of UNTs were high when the related yield characteristics of tillers with UNT appearance were high
ã¹ã€ãã³ã±ã€ãã³ ã ã»ã€ã€ã¯ ã¹ã« ãªãªãã³ PLANTAGO ASIATICA L. ã ãã¯ãã§ãŠãã ã ã·ã¥ã·ããã¬ãã¯ã»ã€ ã² ãŠãŠã¹ã«
æ°Žç°çŠçã«ãããŠ,ãªãªãã³ã¯åå£æµäº¡ã®é²æ¢,ç·ç°å¢ã®ç¶æã®åœ¹å²ãæ
ã£ãŠããäžå¯æ¬ ãªæ€ç©ã®äžçš®ã§ãããããã§ã¯,çŠç管çãšããŠã®ååãäœæ¥ãå®æœããããçš®åã§ã®ã¿ç¹æ®ãããªãªãã³ã«ãšã£ãŠ,ååãã¯çæ®æé·ã»çš®åç¹æ®ã®å¶éèŠå ãšãªãã,çŸå°ã§ã¯åååŸã«å¹Œæ€ç©ã®ç¹èã芳å¯ããããããã«ã¯è¡šå±€åã«ååšããçš®åããã®çºèœã»æé·ãèããã,æ°Žç°çŠçã§ã¯çš®åã®äŒç æ§ã匱ãããšãæ³å®ããããããã§,ãªãªãã³çš®åã®çºèœç¹æ§ã,æ°Žç°çŠçãå«ãè€æ°ã®çè²å°ããæ¡åããçš®åãçšããŠæ¯èŒæ€èšãããããã«,æ°Žç°çŠçããã³èžã¿è·¡åºå Žã§çè²ããŠãããªãªãã³ããæ¡åããæççš®åã®å£ç¯çåºèœç¹æ§ãæ¯èŒããããããã®çµæãããšã«,æ°Žç°çŠçã«çè²ãããªãªãã³çš®åã®çºèœç¹æ§ã,ååãã«å¯Ÿããé©å¿æ§ã®èŠ³ç¹ããæ€èšããããã®çµæ,æ°Žç°çŠçããæ¡åãããªãªãã³çš®åã¯ãããã90%以äžã®é«ãçºèœçã瀺ããããŸã,æ¡çš®ææã«ãããããæçš®çŽåŸã«éããã«åºèœãããäžæ¹,èžã¿è·¡åºå Žããæ¡åããçš®åã§ã¯,7æäžæ¬ã«æ¡åããçš®åã¯åºèœçãäœã,ç§æ¡åã®çš®åã¯åºèœã«é
延ãã¿ãã,ç§ããåå¬ã«æ¡åããçš®åã¯æçš®çŽåŸã«ã¯å
šãåºèœãã,ç¿æ¥ã«ååºèœãããã¯åºèœãããªã©,çš®ååºèœç¹æ§ã«ããªã倧ããªå£ç¯å€åã瀺ãããã以äžãã,æ°Žç°çŠçã«çè²ãããªãªãã³ã®æççš®åã¯æ¡çš®å Žæãæ¡çš®ææã«ããããã,çºèœå¥œé©æ¡ä»¶äžã§ã¯éããã«çºèœã§ããããšãå€æããããã®ããšãã,ãªãªãã³ã¯æ°Žç°çŠçã«ãããŠã¯,ååãã«ãã£ãŠæ¢åæ€çãäžæçã«çãšãªã,å°éã®å
匷床ã匷ãŸãæ¡ä»¶ã§,湿最ãªåå£ç°å¢ãå©çšããŠéãããªåºèœãå¯èœã§ããç¹æ§ãæãããã®ãšæšå¯ããããIn paddy field levees, the Asiatic plantain is a necessary plant that supports prevention of soil run-off and maintenance of a green environment. At such places, grass mowing is done as farmland management. For the Asiatic plantain, which reproduces solely from seed, mowing could negatively affect generative growth and seed propagation. Despite this potential damage, thickly regrown seedlings can be observed soon after mowing operations. This rapid emergence response of the plant indicates that many seeds of this species exist in and on the soil. It is assumed that the seed dormancy is weak in the paddy field levee. Thus, the seed dormancy of the Asiatic plantain was investigated using seeds in many growing locations including paddy field levees. Furthermore, seasonal germination characteristics of the Asiatic plantain seed in a paddy field levee were compared with those in other areas (an open land), thereby clarifying the germination characteristics of this plant\u27s seeds. Based on the results obtained, the adaptability for mowing of the Asiatic plantain seed in the paddy field levee was examined.Consequently, the seed collected from the paddy field levee showed a high germination percentage of greater than 90% without exception, and the ratio of dormant seeds was small. Regarding the seeds of plants grown in open land, the emergence varied among seasons : seed collected in mid-July showed a low emergence rate and that in autumn a delayed emergence. The seed collected in the open land during late fall to early winter was unable to emerge soon after sowing, but emerged in the following spring.These results show that, regardless of the seed production season, the mature seeds of the Asiatic plantain growing in paddy field levee can germinate immediately after sowing under environmental conditions suitable for germination. Therefore, it is considered that the seed grown in a certain place begins to germinate in response to full sunlight exposure on the moist soil after mowing, and thereby the Asiatic plantain can succeed its life cycle in the paddy field levee
ã³ãŠãµã¯ã ã ãªã±ã« ãªãªãã³ PLANTAGO ASIATICA L. ã ãã€ãã£ã¯ ã ãªãšãã¹ ãããã ãã¯ã ã ãšã€ãã§ãŠ
ãªãªãã³ã¯çŠçããã³èŸ²éã§ã¯æºçã«ç¹æ®ããã,èèµ·å°ã§ã¯ç¹èããªãããšãç¥ãããŠããããã®èŠå ã解æãããã,ãªãªãã³ããã³æ¯èŒæ€ç©ãšããŠã¡ãã·ã,ãªãã·ãããã³ã¹ããªããŠãçšããŠ,èèãæ³å®ããåŒæã,å没åŠçã«å¯Ÿããåçåå¿,ããã³èèåŸã®çš®ååçç£èœåæšå®ã®ããã®æçš®æå¥çæ®æé·å°éæ¥æ°ã«ã€ããŠæ€èšãããå®éš1ãšããŠ,3ããã³5èæã®åäœãåŒæãåŸ,ãããã¯åŒæããã«,ãããã®åäœãæ·±ã2ããã³6cmã«åå£ã§å没ããã察ç
§åºã«ã¯,åŒæãããã³å没ãããªãåºãåœãŠãããã®çµæ,6cmã®å没åºã«ãããŠã¯,åŒæãã®æç¡,åŠçã®ææã«ããããã4çš®ãšãå
šãåçããªãã£ãã,2cmã®å没åºã§ã¯,åççšåºŠã«èããçš®éå·®ããã£ãããªãªãã³ã§ã¯ç¡åŒæãåºã«ãããŠ,察ç
§åºã®3%(3èæåŠç)∼17%(5èæåŠç),ã¹ããªããŠã§ã¯åŒæãåºã§3%(3èæåŠç)∼27%(5èæåŠç),ç¡åŒæãåºã§13%(3èæåŠç)∼27%(5èæåŠç),ã¡ãã·ãã§ã¯åŒæãåºããã³ç¡åŒæãåºãããã3%(3èæåŠç)∼7%ããã³20%(5èæåŠç),ãªãã·ãã§ã¯5èæã®åŒæãåºã®ã¿3%ãåçãããåçåäœã®èäžã¯,ãªãªãã³ã«ãããŠå£ã£ããå®éš2ãšããŠ,5∼7æã«æçš®ãããšãã,7ææçš®ã®ãªãªãã³ã®ã¿åœå¹Žå
ã«ã¯çæ®æé·ã«è³ããªãã£ãã以äžã®ããã«,ãªãªãã³åäœã¯èèæã«åå£ããåŒæãã,åå£äžã«å没ããããšå
šãåçã§ãã,åŒæãããªããŠãåå£å没ã«ãã£ãŠåçãå£ã,èäžãäœã,ããã«,å£ç¯çã«é
ãåºèœããåäœã§ã¯çš®åçç£ãåœå¹Žå
ã«è¡ããã,èå°ã«ãããŠç掻ç°ã®å®çµãå°é£ã«ãªããã®ãšæšå¯ããããAsiatic plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) grows thickly and rapidly in levees and farm roads, but not in cultivated fields. We clarified the non-adaptability of Asiatic plantain to fields that had been plowed for management.Generally, plowing pulls up, cuts, and buries plants under the soil. The experiment described herein investigates regrowth responses against artificially simulated “pulling-up” and “soil covering” caused by plowing. Assuming that germination from buried seeds occurs after plowing, florescence occurring within a year from seed sowing was examined. Asiatic plantain was examined along with upland weeds : hairy crabgrass (Digitaria adscendens (H.B.K.) Henr.), goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.), and common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.).Plants in three-leaf and five-leaf stages were pulled up and covered with 2cm or 6cm deep soil. For comparison, plants that had not been pulled up were treated without soil covering (established plants hereinafter).Results show that none of the four plants with soil covering thickness of 6cm regrew. However, with 2-cm-thick coverage, considerable differences were apparent among species. Regarding Asiatic plantain, only 3% (three-leaf stage treatment)-17% (five-leaf stage treatment) of established plants regrew. Regarding common purslane, 3% (three-leaf stage treatment)-27% (five-leaf stage treatment) of the plants regrew when pulled up ; 13% (three-leaf stage treatment)-27% (five-leaf stage treatment) of plants regrew with no pulling-up treatment. For hairy crabgrass, 3% (three-leaf stage treatment)-7% (five-leaf stage treatment) of plants regrew with pulling-up treatment ; 20% of plants regrew in the five-leaf stage with none in the pulling-up treatment. Furthermore, only 3% of the goosegrass pulled up at the five-leaf stage regrew. The regrown Asiatic plantain plant length was considerably less. Of the four species sown in May, June, and July, only the Asiatic plantain did not flower within the year sown in July.As described above, Asiatic plantain, once pulled up from the soil, is unable to regrow. Plants that are covered with soil, even if established, are very small. Seedlings that germinate in the late season (summer) have insufficient time to produce seed. These results underscore that Asiatic plantain cannot complete its life cycle in a frequently plowed field
ã¿ã€ã ã¬ã³ãã³ ã·ãšãŠ ã ãšã« ã¶ããœãŠ ããã»ã€ãªã§ãŠ ã ãã³ã« ã ãœã ãšãŠã€ã³ ã ã«ã€ã¡ã€
è¿å¹Ž,å è¥ã掻çšããæ œå¹ãæ®åããŠããã,ããã«äŒŽãå è¥æœçšåå Žã§çºçããéèã®çš®é¡ããã³ãã®éãååŠè¥ææœçšåå Žãšã¯ããªãç°ãªã£ãŠããããšã芳å¯ãããŠãããããã,äœç©çç£åå Žã§ã®ãã®è©³çŽ°ãªå®æ
ã«ã€ããŠã®å ±åã¯ã»ãšãã©ãªããããã§,æ¬ç 究ã§ã¯,å è¥æœçšã®æç¡ã«ããéèçºçã®å·®ç°ã®å®æ
ãšãã®èŠå ã«ã€ããŠæ€èšããã2002幎ãã2008幎ãŸã§ã®7幎é,äž¡åå Žã§ã¹ã€ãŒãã³ãŒã³ãæ œå¹ã,407幎ç®ã«èª¿æ»ãè¡ã£ããæ¬è©Šéšã§ã®ååŠè¥ææœçšåå Žã¯ååŠè¥æ(N, P^2O^5, K^2O, å10kg/10a/幎)ãæœçšãããå è¥æœçšåå Žã¯,å è¥(2tDM/10a)ããã³ååŠè¥æ(幎次ã«ããN, P^2O^5, K^2Oå0ïœ2Kg/10a)ãæœçšãããããã«,å è¥æœçšéå§æã®å€åãæãã«ããããã«,å è¥æœçšå±¥æŽã®ãªãæ°èŠåå Žã«2007幎ããåæ§ã®è©Šéšåº(å è¥åºã®ååŠè¥æã¯N, P^2O^5, K^2Oå2,10,10kg/10a)ãèšå®ã,å幎ãšæ¬¡å¹ŽåºŠã«èª¿æ»ãããçµæã¯ä»¥äžã®ãšããã§ãããäž¡è©Šéšã«ãããŠ,ååŠè¥ææœçšåå Žã§ã¯,åžžã«ã¡ãã·ããåªå ãããããã«å¯ŸããŠ,å è¥æœçšåå Žã§ã¯,ã¡ãã·ãã®ã¿ã§ãªã,åºèéè(ããœã¢ãªã²ã€ããŠ,ã¢ã¡ãªã«ã¿ã«ãµãããŠãªã©)ãåªå ãã幎ããã£ããã¹ã€ãŒãã³ãŒã³æ œå¹æéäžãšåç©«åŸã®éèã®ç·ä¹Ÿç©éã¯,ååŠè¥ææœçšåå Žã«æ¯ã¹å è¥æœçšåå Žã§å è¥æœçšå幎ç®ããæããã«äžåã幎ããã£ããåå£äžã®ç¡é
žæ
çªçŽ æ¿åºŠã¯,ååŠè¥ææœçšåå Žã«æ¯ã¹å è¥æœçšåå Žã§äžåãåŸåãèŠãããã以äžã®ããšãã,å è¥ãæœçšããããšã«ãã£ãŠ,åªå éèçš®ã«å€§ããªå€åãçãããšãšãã«éèã®ä¹Ÿç©éãå¢å€§ããåŸåã«ããããšãæããã«ãªã£ãããã®å€åã®èŠå ãšããŠã¯,å è¥ã®é£å¹Žæœçšã«ããåå£äžã®ç¡é
žæ
çªçŽ ã®å¢å ã«ãããšèå¯ããããIn recent years, cultivation using compost application has become popular in Japan. The kinds and quantities of weeds in fields with applied compost differ considerably from those in fields using chemical fertilizers. However, few reports describe the effects in crop fields. This study evaluated differences in the appearance of weeds in fields and clarified the factors conducive to them. We cultivated sweet corn in two fields for six years from 2002, and investigated them during years 3-6. To one field, chemical fertilizer was applied (N, P^2O^5, K^2O ; 10kg/10a/yr). To another field, composted animal waste was applied (2 tDM/10a/yr) along with chemical fertilizer (N, P^2O^5, K^2O ; 0-2 kg/10a/yr). Another examination was conducted in 2007 to clarify early changes of compost application in a new field to which compost had not been applied. On field of applied compost in this investigation, a little chemical fertilizer (N, P^2O^5, K^2O ; 2, 10, 10 kg/10a/yr) was used with the compost. The results were the following. In the field using chemical fertilizer alone, Digitaria ciliaris was consistently dominant in both investigations. In contrast, in the field with applied compost, Digitaria ciliaris and several species (Amaranthus patulus, Eclipta alba) of broad-leaf weeds were frequently dominant. The dry matter weight of plants in the field with applied compost surpassed that of the field using chemical fertilizer annually during the sweet corn growing season and after harvesting from the first year of compost application. The nitrate nitrogen concentration of soil in the field with applied compost was higher than that of the field with applied chemical fertilizer. The results described above show that compost application increased the variety of dominant weeds and tended to increase the dry matter weight of weeds. The increase of nitrate nitrogen into the soil caused by continuous application of compost was inferred as a contributing factor to these changes