24 research outputs found

    Relationship between the estimated cost of decontamination per person per unit area and the estimated annual external dose with decontamination in the special decontamination areas in Fukushima.

    No full text
    <p>Cost per person per unit area was calculated by the estimated decontamination cost divided by the population of the unit area. Population data are based on the 2010 Population Census.</p

    Unit cost for storage phase of decontamination and total of all the unit costs considered in the present analysis.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup>Three options are assumed for the interim storage: D1 assumes combustible waste to be subjected to volume reduction and different types of disposal for high-elution materials (isolation-type disposal) and low-elution materials (control-type disposal) are used. D2 assumes combustible waste to be subjected to volume reduction and isolation-type disposal for both high-elution and low-elution materials is used. D3 assumes no volume reduction and isolation-type disposal is used for all waste.</p><p><sup>b</sup>Total consists of clean-up and storage costs.</p

    Unit cost and number of flexible containers for clean-up phase of decontamination for different method considered in the present analysis.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup>Number of flexible containers used to store contaminated wastes generated by removal phase. The volume of a container is assumed to be 0.9 m<sup>3</sup> and the cost of a flexible container is assumed to be 8,000 JPY/unit.</p><p><sup>b</sup>The cost of the temporary storage per flexible container is assumed to be 20,000 JPY/unit.</p><p><sup>c</sup> Obtained from Fukushima [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0075308#B10" target="_blank">10</a>].</p><p><sup>d</sup> Obtained from JAEA [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0075308#B11" target="_blank">11</a>]. For the decontamination cost for F1, the unit cost was estimated considering the slope angle of the area based on the report.</p

    Target area of the present study.

    No full text
    <p>Target area of the present study.</p

    Estimated trends of potential inhabitants returning to their former residence areas for different dose levels with and without decontamination.

    No full text
    <p>Population data are based on the 2010 Population Census, and demographic factors were not considered in this analysis.</p

    Decontamination efficiencies for different decontamination methods

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup>The values of the decontamination efficiency were estimated based on data on the efficiency of the aerial decontamination in the municipalities.</p><p>[17].</p

    Estimated costs of different decontamination methods for various land uses in the special decontamination areas in Fukushima.

    No full text
    <p>Estimated costs of different decontamination methods for various land uses in the special decontamination areas in Fukushima.</p

    General characteristics of the special decontamination areas.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup> Population is based on the 2010 Population Census [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0075308#B18" target="_blank">18</a>]. The population in areas in which only the part of the municipality is affected was obtained by assuming the population to be proportional to the area.</p><p><sup>b</sup>Estimated Based on GIS 1-km mesh data</p
    corecore