KIR2DS5 is associated with leukemia free survival after HLA identical stem cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Contains fulltext : 69575.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Alloreactive NK cells play a role in tumor eradication after allogeneic HLA mismatched stem cell transplantation (SCT). The effect of NK alloreactivity in HLA identical SCT is still under debate and in particular in transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) the data are very limited and with conflicting outcome. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of KIR genes and KIR ligands on leukemia free survival (LFS) and relapse rate in a well-defined, homogeneous group of CML patients phase upon HLA identical sibling SCT. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of KIRs and KIR ligands (C1 and C2) on LFS and relapse in 70 CML patients in 1st chronic phase, who had received an HLA identical sibling graft. For KIR typing we used a single PCR based KIR typing protocol that also included primers allowing for the identification of the KIR binding site on HLA-Cw (AA 77 and 80). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The data show clear differences in transplant outcome between patients having both ligands (C1 and C2) as compared to patients having only one ligand (C1 or C2). In the latter group, the stimulatory KIR2DS5 gene was associated with improved leukemia free survival (p=0.007; hazard ratio 4.3; 95% confidence interval 1.3-6.7) and lower relapse rates (p=0.028; HR 4.3, 95% CI 1.1-9.1). In contrast, in patients carrying both ligands, KIR2DS5 was associated with reduced LFS (p=0.0056; HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.7) and higher relapse rate (p=0.02; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.1-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a role for an NK mediated anti-CML response after HLA identical sibling SCT that is influenced by KIR ligands and, more importantly, by stimulatory KIRs present in the donor

Graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor lymphocyte transfusions in marrow grafted patients.

Contains fulltext : 22128___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Trends in treated drug misuse in the Southern Health Board Area 1996-2000. Occasional Paper no. 1.

This occasional paper contains information gathered by the National Drug Treatment Reporting System (NDTRS), an epidemiological database on treated drug misuse complied by the Drug Misuse Research Division (DMRD) of the Health Research Board (HRB). The data shows that between 1996 and 1999 the number of drug users presenting for treatment within the Southern Health Board (SHB) remained fairly stable at less than 300. This changed in 2000, with an increase of 66% to 429 clients. This was in part was due to an increase in service provision and also an increase in drug use. The socio-demographic data showed that the typical client is male, in his early twenties and living in the family home. Cannabis is the main drug causing problems (65% in 2000), with ecstasy the second most commonly used (15% in the same year). Opiate use rose from 5% in 1996 to 10% in 2000

Graft-versus-host disease and outcome in HLA-identical sibling transplantations for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Graft-versus-host disease in its acute (aGvHD) or chronic form (cGvHD) remains the most important posttransplantation factor influencing outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It increases transplantation-related mortality (TRM) but reduces risk of relapse. The net effect of these 2 discordant effects determines survival. In view of current interests to exploit graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects, we analyzed 4174 HLA-identical sibling transplantations for chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase, depending on the presence or absence and severity of GvHD with a landmark analysis. During the first 100 days, only aGvHD grades III and IV had an impact on TRM. During the time period day 100 to 3 years increasing severity of aGvHD is associated with increased TRM and decreased relapse incidence (RI) with hazard ratios (HRs) for TRM as follows: grade 0, HR = 1.0; grade I, HR = 1.52 (1.19-1.96); grade II, HR = 2.48 (1.95-3.14); grade III, HR = 5.76 (4.44-7.48); grade IV, HR = 14.7 (10.9-19.9) and likewise for RI: grade I versus 0, HR = 0.94 (0.76-1.16); grade II, HR = 0.60 (0.46-0.77); grade III, HR = 0.48 (0.29-0.81); grade IV, HR = 0.14 (0.02-0.99). Beyond 3 years, TRM and RI are determined by cGvHD. Limited cGvHD reduces RI to the same extent as extensive cGvHD but has no impact on TRM and, hence, results in best survival with an HR = 0.48 (0.32-0.71). aGvHD grade I has the highest likelihood of subsequent limited cGvHD, which results in cumulative incidence estimates of survival at 10 years being best for patients with initial aGvHD grade I: survival at 10 years grade 0 = 59%, I = 63%, II = 56%, III = 26%, IV = not applicable. These data clarify the role of GvHD in posttransplantation outcome. Considerations for long-term outcome are essential when short-term data of interventions on GvHD are analyzed