Phase II trial of fenretinide in advanced renal carcinoma

Purpose : Fenretinide, a synthetic form of retinoid, induced apoptosis even in chemotherapy resistant cell lines. A phase II study was hence conducted to evaluate toxicity and efficacy of fenretinide in metastatic renal cancer. Methods : Eligibility included unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), adequate organ function and Zubrod performance status ≦2. Prior immunotherapy and a maximum of one prior chemotherapy regimen were allowed. Fenretinide was administered at a dose of 900 mg/m 2 twice daily orally for 7 days in a 21-day cycle. Toxicity was assessed at the start of each cycle, and response every 2 cycles. Results : Nineteen eligible patients enrolled of which fifteen had visceral/bone metastases. Seventeen patients had prior nephrectomy and 11 had prior immunotherapy. 76 cycles of therapy were delivered. Therapy was very well tolerated with few severe toxicities consisting of thrombosis in 1 individual and grade 3 fatigue, nausea and diarrhea in 1 patient. 5 patients had grade 2 nyctalopia and 3 patients had transient grade 2 visual toxicity. No objective responses were noted. Stable disease was seen in seven of nineteen cases (37%, 90% C.I. 0.21–0.59). Median time to progression was 1.5 months and median duration of stable disease was 5.8 months (90% C.I. 3.0–8.4). Median survival was 10 months. Tumor fenretinide levels were obtained in three patients and were in the lower end of the therapeutic range. Conclusion : Fenretinide was well tolerated but demonstrated minimal activity that was consistent with results of intratumoral drug measurements. Strategies are needed that will increase systemic and tumor levels of fenretinide.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45264/1/10637_2005_Article_5864.pd

A Wolf in Sheep\u27s Clothing: An Unusual Presentation of Diabetic Myonecrosis

© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. GENERAL PURPOSE: To provide information about the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic myonecrosis (DMN). TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to: 1. Cite the incidence and symptomatology of diabetic myonecrosis. 2. Identify the diagnostic tests associated with DMN. 3. Summarize the evidence-based treatments for DMN

A Phase I Clinical Trial of Spicamycin Derivative KRN5500 (NSC 650426) Using a Phase I Accelerated Titration “2B” Design

The spicamycin derivative KRN5500 was considered as a potential anti-cancer agent based on in vitro and preclinical studies. A Phase I study involving 24 cancer patients in whom tumors were refractory to all other conventional therapies was conducted to determine the dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, effectiveness, and pharmacokinetic parameters of this drug administered by 1-h IV infusion daily for five consecutive days every 3 weeks. Using an accelerated dose titration strategy, 8.4 mg/m 2 /d × 5 days was the maximum administered dose. Severe gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities were observed at doses at or above 4.3 mg/m 2 /d × 5. The recommended Phase II dose is 4.3 mg/m 2 /d × 5. The distribution of KRN5500 followed a two-compartment model, and clearance did not decrease significantly over the dose range 0.8–8.4 mg/m 2 /d × 5. No significant correlation was observed between plasma levels and toxicity. No tumor responses were observed among the 14 patients evaluable for response.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45232/1/10637_2004_Article_5109792.pd

An open-label study to describe pharmacokinetic parameters of erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with adequate and moderately impaired hepatic function

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a single dose of erlotinib in cancer patients with moderate hepatic impairment (MHI) to those of cancer patients with adequate hepatic function (AHF). <p/>Methods: Cancer patients with either AHF or MHI were treated with a single 150 mg dose of erlotinib on day 1 only followed by 96 h of plasma sampling for PK assessment. From day 5, patients were allowed to continue daily erlotinib in a maintenance phase. Non-smoking patients were stratified into an AHF cohort (total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN] and ALT/AST ≤ 1.5 X ULN) or a MHI cohort (Child-Pugh score of 7–9). The frequency of adverse events and laboratory changes were assessed. <p/>Results: Thirty-six patients, 21 with AHF and 15 with MHI, received at least one dose of erlotinib. The PK of erlotinib was similar between the two cohorts with a median C max of 1.09 versus 0.828 μg/mL and corresponding median AUC0−t 29.3 versus 30.5 μg h/mL for the AHF and MHI cohorts, respectively. Adverse events from erlotinib in cancer patients with MHI were consistent with the known safety profile. <p/>Conclusions: The PK and safety profiles of erlotinib in patients with MHI were similar to those with AHF. As a result, a reduced starting dose of erlotinib in patients with MHI is not required and treatment should be guided by patients’ tolerability