Analysis of atrial sensed far-field ventricular signals:A reassessment

Accurate detection of the spontaneous far-field ventricular signal may be used to determine the ventricular activation, and hence, the interval from atrial stimulus to the ventricular R wave (AR interval) using a standard atrial pacing lead. This can be useful in developing a physiological atrial rate responsive (AAIR) pace-maker and in further improving DDD(R) pacing algorithms. In order to better characterize the atrial sensed far-field ventricular signal, 200 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation were studied. The amplitude of the far-field ventricular signal was significantly smaller than that of the atrial deflection. In all recordings, the slew rate oft he atrial deflection was larger than that of the far-field ventricular signal. Subdivision of the recordings by electrode position, pocket location, or QRS duration on the surface ECG resulted in significantly different signal characteristics. The amplitude and slew rate of the far-field ventricular signal were significantly smaller in bipolar versus unipolar sensing. Atrial sensed far-field ventricular recordings could also be obtained in the case of ventricular pacing. Our results indicate that accurate sensing of the far-field ventricular signal from an atrial pacing lead is conceivable in most patients. The different signal characteristics in relation to parameters, such as electrode position, sensing mode, and pocket location, may be useful in determining the optimal conditions for signal sensing

Discrimination of Retrograde from Anterograde Atrial Activation Using Intracardiac Electrogram Waveform Analysis

The prevention of pacemaker-mediated tachycardias requires a safe, reliable method for distinguishing retrograde from anterograde atrial activation by dual chamber pacemakers. In this study, a technique was developed to detect the morphological change that occurs in the waveform of the intra-atrial electrogram during retrograde atrial activation. The method employed for waveform analysis is based upon statistical correlation. In 19 patients undergoing electrophysiological studies, atrial electrograms were recorded from bipolar endocardial electrodes during sinus rhythm and 1:1 retrograde atrial depolarization while undergoing right ventricular pacing. Data were digitally sampled at 750, 1,000, and 1,500 Hz. Templates of anterograde atrial depolarization were constructed by signal averaging waveforms from an initial sinus rhythm passage. These were used for analysis of anterograde depolarizations from a subsequent passage of sinus rhythm and a passage of known retrograde atrial depolarization. In all 19 cases, a patient-specific threshold could be derived to separate anterograde from retrograde atrial depolarizations using 1,000 Hz and 1,500 Hz sampling rates. However, at a sampling rate of 750 Hz, separation of anterograde from retrograde atrial activation was possible in only 16/19 patients (84%). We conclude that correlation waveform analysis of a suitably sampled atrial electrogram is a reliable method of discriminating retrograde atrial depolarization from anterograde atrial depolarization in intracardiac electrograms.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74438/1/j.1540-8159.1989.tb01841.x.pd