4 research outputs found
Point estimates of percent signal change graphed as a function of EFT (pre vs. post) by handholding (alone, stranger, partner) and DAS score.
<p>Point estimates were computed separately for individuals high (+1SD) and low (−1SD) in DAS. Point estimates reflect average percent signal change (threat – safe) from all voxels activated in the original Coan et al., handholding study.</p
Valence and arousal graphed as a function of EFT (pre vs. post) by handholding (alone vs. stranger vs. partner).
<p>Panel A shows mean (± (anr Pleasantness ratings. Panel B shows mean (±SE) Arousal ratings.</p
Percent signal change (±SE) graphed as a function of EFT (pre vs. post) by handholding (alone vs. partner) interaction effects.
<p>Row A represents activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Row B represents activity in the right inferior frontal Gyrus (IFG).</p
Point estimates of percent signal change graphed as a function of EFT (pre vs. post) by handholding (alone vs. partner) and DAS score.
<p>Point estimates were computed separately for individuals high (+1SD) and low (−1SD) in DAS. Row A represents activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Row B represents activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC).</p