From old wars to new wars and global terrorism

Even before 9/11 there were claims that the nature of war had changed fundamentally. The 9/11 attacks created an urgent need to understand contemporary wars and their relationship to older conventional and terrorist wars, both of which exhibit remarkable regularities. The frequency-intensity distribution of fatalities in "old wars", 1816-1980, is a power-law with exponent 1.80. Global terrorist attacks, 1968-present, also follow a power-law with exponent 1.71 for G7 countries and 2.5 for non-G7 countries. Here we analyze two ongoing, high-profile wars on opposite sides of the globe - Colombia and Iraq. Our analysis uses our own unique dataset for killings and injuries in Colombia, plus publicly available data for civilians killed in Iraq. We show strong evidence for power-law behavior within each war. Despite substantial differences in contexts and data coverage, the power-law coefficients for both wars are tending toward 2.5, which is a value characteristic of non-G7 terrorism as opposed to old wars. We propose a plausible yet analytically-solvable model of modern insurgent warfare, which can explain these observations.Comment: For more information, please contact [email protected] or [email protected]

From old wars to new wars and global terrorism

The 9/11 attacks created an urgent need to understand contemporary wars and their relationship to older conventional and terrorist wars, both of which exhibit remarkable regularities. The frequency-intensity distribution of fatalities in "old wars", 1816-1980, is a power-law with exponent 1.80. Global terrorist attacks, 1968-present, also follow a power-law with exponent 1.71 for G7 countries and 2.5 for non-G7 countries. Here we analyze two ongoing, high-profile wars on opposite sides of the globe - Colombia and Iraq. Our analysis uses our own unique dataset for killings and injuries in Colombia, plus publicly available data for civilians killed in Iraq. We show strong evidence for power-law behavior within each war. Despite substantial differences in contexts and data coverage, the power-law coefficients for both wars are tending toward 2.5, which is a value characteristic of non-G7 terrorism as opposed to old wars. We propose a plausible yet analytically-solvable model of modern insurgent warfare, which can explain these observations.

Impact assessment of irrigation management transfer in the Alto Rio Lerma Irrigation District, Mexico

Irrigation managementPrivatizationAssessmentEconomic aspectsLegal aspectsData collectionWater rightsWater allocationWater distributionGroundwaterFinancingMaintenanceOperationsAgricultural productionWater users' associationsFarmer participation

Performance of two transferred modules in the Lagunera Region: Water relations

Water policy / Performance / Privatization / Irrigation systems / Operations / Maintenance / Irrigation efficiency / Water users' associations / Water rights / Water allocation / Water supply / Water distribution

Complexity of the Online Distrust Ecosystem and its Evolution

Collective human distrust (and its associated mis-disinformation) is one of the most complex phenomena of our time. e.g. distrust of medical expertise, or climate change science, or democratic election outcomes, and even distrust of fact-checked events in the current Israel-Hamas and Ukraine-Russia conflicts. So what makes the online distrust ecosystem so resilient? How has it evolved during and since the pandemic? And how well have Facebook mitigation policies worked during this time period? We analyze a Facebook network of interconnected in-built communities (Facebook pages) totaling roughly 100 million users who pre-pandemic were just focused on distrust of vaccines. Mapping out this dynamical network from 2019 to 2023, we show that it has quickly self-healed in the wake of Facebook's mitigation campaigns which include shutdowns. This confirms and extends our earlier finding that Facebook's ramp-ups during COVID were ineffective (e.g. November 2020). Our findings show that future interventions must be chosen to resonate across multiple topics and across multiple geographical scales. Unlike many recent studies, our findings do not rely on third-party black-box tools whose accuracy for rigorous scientific research is unproven, hence raising doubts about such studies' conclusions, nor is our network built using fleeting hyperlink mentions which have questionable relevance

Rise of post-pandemic resilience across the distrust ecosystem

Why is distrust (e.g. of medical expertise) now flourishing online despite the surge in mitigation schemes being implemented? We analyze the changing discourse in the Facebook ecosystem of approximately 100 million users who pre-pandemic were focused on (dis)trust of vaccines. We find that post-pandemic, their discourse strongly entangles multiple non-vaccine topics and geographic scales both within and across communities. This gives the current distrust ecosystem a unique system-level resistance to mitigations that target a specific topic and geographic scale -- which is the case of many current schemes due to their funding focus, e.g. local health not national elections. Backed up by detailed numerical simulations, our results reveal the following counterintuitive solutions for implementing more effective mitigation schemes at scale: shift to 'glocal' messaging by (1) blending particular sets of distinct topics (e.g. combine messaging about specific diseases with climate change) and (2) blending geographic scales

A computational science approach to understanding human conflict

Contains fulltext : 228784.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access