5,018 research outputs found
Quantum error correction for continuously detected errors
We show that quantum feedback control can be used as a quantum error
correction process for errors induced by weak continuous measurement. In
particular, when the error model is restricted to one, perfectly measured,
error channel per physical qubit, quantum feedback can act to perfectly protect
a stabilizer codespace. Using the stabilizer formalism we derive an explicit
scheme, involving feedback and an additional constant Hamiltonian, to protect
an ()-qubit logical state encoded in physical qubits. This works for
both Poisson (jump) and white-noise (diffusion) measurement processes. In
addition, universal quantum computation is possible in this scheme. As an
example, we show that detected-spontaneous emission error correction with a
driving Hamiltonian can greatly reduce the amount of redundancy required to
protect a state from that which has been previously postulated [e.g., Alber
\emph{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4402 (2001)].Comment: 11 pages, 1 figure; minor correction
Reply to Norsen's paper "Are there really two different Bell's theorems?"
Yes. That is my polemical reply to the titular question in Travis Norsen's
self-styled "polemical response to Howard Wiseman's recent paper." Less
polemically, I am pleased to see that on two of my positions --- that Bell's
1964 theorem is different from Bell's 1976 theorem, and that the former does
not include Bell's one-paragraph heuristic presentation of the EPR argument ---
Norsen has made significant concessions. In his response, Norsen admits that
"Bell's recapitulation of the EPR argument in [the relevant] paragraph leaves
something to be desired," that it "disappoints" and is "problematic". Moreover,
Norsen makes other statements that imply, on the face of it, that he should
have no objections to the title of my recent paper ("The Two Bell's Theorems of
John Bell"). My principle aim in writing that paper was to try to bridge the
gap between two interpretational camps, whom I call 'operationalists' and
'realists', by pointing out that they use the phrase "Bell's theorem" to mean
different things: his 1964 theorem (assuming locality and determinism) and his
1976 theorem (assuming local causality), respectively. Thus, it is heartening
that at least one person from one side has taken one step on my bridge. That
said, there are several issues of contention with Norsen, which we (the two
authors) address after discussing the extent of our agreement with Norsen. The
most significant issues are: the indefiniteness of the word 'locality' prior to
1964; and the assumptions Einstein made in the paper quoted by Bell in 1964 and
their relation to Bell's theorem.Comment: 13 pages (arXiv version) in http://www.ijqf.org/archives/209
All-optical versus electro-optical quantum-limited feedback
All-optical feedback can be effected by putting the output of a source cavity
through a Faraday isolator and into a second cavity which is coupled to the
source cavity by a nonlinear crystal. If the driven cavity is heavily damped,
then it can be adiabatically eliminated and a master equation or quantum
Langevin equation derived for the first cavity alone. This is done for an input
bath in an arbitrary state, and for an arbitrary nonlinear coupling. If the
intercavity coupling involves only the intensity (or one quadrature) of the
driven cavity, then the effect on the source cavity is identical to that which
can be obtained from electro-optical feedback using direct (or homodyne)
detection. If the coupling involves both quadratures, this equivalence no
longer holds, and a coupling linear in the source amplitude can produce a
nonclassical state in the source cavity. The analogous electro-optic scheme
using heterodyne detection introduces extra noise which prevents the production
of nonclassical light. Unlike the electro-optic case, the all-optical feedback
loop has an output beam (reflected from the second cavity). We show that this
may be squeezed, even if the source cavity remains in a classical state.Comment: 21 pages. This is an old (1994) paper, but one which I thought was
worth posting because in addition to what is described in abstract it has:
(1) the first formulation (to my knowledge) of quantum trajectories for an
arbitrary (i.e. squeezed, thermal etc.) broadband bath; (2) the prediction of
a periodic modification to the detuning and damping of an oscillator for the
simplest sort of all-optical feedback (i.e. a mirror) as seen in the recent
experiment "Forces between a Single Atom and Its Distant Mirror Image", P.
Bushev et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 223602 (2004
Recommended from our members
Assessment of sexual difficulties associated with multi-modal treatment for cervical or endometrial cancer: A systematic review of measurement instruments
Background: Practitioners and researchers require an outcome measure that accurately identifies the range of common treatment-induced changes in sexual function and well-being experienced by women after cervical or endometrial cancer. This systematic review critically appraised the measurement properties and clinical utility of instruments validated for the measurement of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in this clinical population.
Methods: A bibliographic database search for questionnaire development or validation papers was completed and methodological quality and measurement properties of selected studies rated using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) checklist.
Results: 738 articles were screened, 13 articles retrieved for full text assessment and 7 studies excluded, resulting in evaluation of 6 papers; 2 QoL and 4 female sexual morbidity measures.
Five of the six instruments omitted one or more dimension of female sexual function and only one instrument explicitly measured distress associated with sexual changes as per DSM V (APA 2013) diagnostic criteria.
None of the papers reported measurement error, responsiveness data was available for only two instruments, three papers failed to report on criterion validity, and test-retest reliability reporting was inconsistent. Heterosexual penile-vaginal intercourse remains the dominant sexual activity focus for sexual morbidity PROMS terminology and instruments lack explicit reference to solo or non-coital sexual expression or validation in a non-heterosexual sample. Four out of six instruments included mediating treatment or illness items such as vaginal changes, menopause or altered body image.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) remains the most robust sexual morbidity outcome measure, for research or clinical use, in sexually active women treated for cervical or endometrial cancer
A matched expansion approach to practical self-force calculations
We discuss a practical method to compute the self-force on a particle moving
through a curved spacetime. This method involves two expansions to calculate
the self-force, one arising from the particle's immediate past and the other
from the more distant past. The expansion in the immediate past is a covariant
Taylor series and can be carried out for all geometries. The more distant
expansion is a mode sum, and may be carried out in those cases where the wave
equation for the field mediating the self-force admits a mode expansion of the
solution. In particular, this method can be used to calculate the gravitational
self-force for a particle of mass mu orbiting a black hole of mass M to order
mu^2, provided mu/M << 1. We discuss how to use these two expansions to
construct a full self-force, and in particular investigate criteria for
matching the two expansions. As with all methods of computing self-forces for
particles moving in black hole spacetimes, one encounters considerable
technical difficulty in applying this method; nevertheless, it appears that the
convergence of each series is good enough that a practical implementation may
be plausible.Comment: IOP style, 8 eps figures, accepted for publication in a special issue
of Classical and Quantum Gravit
- …