35 research outputs found

    The Effect of Soluble RAGE on Inhibition of Angiotensin II-Mediated Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E Deficient Mice

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The cross talk between RAGE and angiotensin II (AngII) activation may be important in the development of atherosclerosis. Soluble RAGE (sRAGE), a truncated soluble form of the receptor, acts as a decoy and prevents the inflammatory response mediated by RAGE activation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of sRAGE in inhibiting AngII-induced atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice (Apo E KO). METHODS AND RESULTS: 9 week old Apo E KO mice were infused subcutaneously with AngII (1 Β΅g/min/kg) and saline for 4 weeks using osmotic mini-pumps. The mice were divided into 4 groups 1. saline infusion and saline injection; 2. saline infusion and sRAGE injection; 3. AngII infusion and saline injection; 4. AngII infusion and sRAGE injection. Saline or 0.5 Β΅g, 1 Β΅g, to 2 Β΅g/day/mouse of sRAGE were injected intraperitoneally daily for 28 days. We showed that atherosclerotic plaque areas in the AngII-infused Apo E KO mice and markers of inflammation such as RAGE, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and MCP-1 were increased in aorta compared to that of the Apo E KO mice. However, the treatment of 0.5 Β΅g, 1 Β΅g, and 2 Β΅g of sRAGE in AngII group resulted in the dose-dependent decrease in atherosclerotic plaque area. We also demonstrated that sRAGE decreased RAGE expression level as well as inflammatory cytokines and cell adhesion molecules in AngII or HMGB1 treated-rat aorta vascular smooth muscle cells. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that partical blockade of RAGE activation by sRAGE prevent AngII -induced atherosclerosis. Therefore these results suggested that first, RAGE activation may be important in mediating AngII-induced atherogenesis, and second, AngII activation is a major pathway in the development of atherosclerosis. Taken together, results from this study may provide the basis for future anti- atherosclerotic drug development mediated through RAGE activation.ope

    Protective effect of survivin in Doxorubicin-induced cell death in h9c2 cardiac myocytes.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Apoptosis has been known to be an important mechanism of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Survivin, which belongs to the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is associated with apoptosis and alteration of the cardiac myocyte molecular pathways. Therefore, we investigated the anti-apoptotic effect and cellular mechanisms of survivin using a protein delivery system in a doxorubicin-induced cardiac myocyte injury model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a recombinant survivin which was fused to the protein transduction domain derived from HIV-TAT protein. In cultured H9c2 cardiac myocytes, TAT-survivin (1 Β΅M) was added for 1 hour prior to doxorubicin (1 Β΅M) treatment for 24 hours. Cell viability and apoptosis were evaluated by 2-(4,5-dimethyltriazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay, caspase-3 activity, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling assay. We measured the expression levels of several apoptosis-related signal proteins. RESULTS: The survivin level was significantly reduced in a dose dependent manner up to 1 Β΅M of doxorubicin in concentration. Purified recombinant TAT-survivin protein was efficiently delivered to H9c2 cardiac myocytes, and its transduction showed an anti-apoptotic effect, demonstrated by reduced caspase-3 activity and the apoptotic index, concomitantly with increased cell viability against doxorubicin injury. The phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and the release of Smac from mitochondria were suppressed and the expression levels of Bcl-2 and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), the transcription factor of Bcl-2, were recovered following TAT-survivin transduction, indicating that survivin had an anti-apoptotic effect against doxorubicin injury. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that survivin has a potentially cytoprotective effect against doxorubicin-induced cardiac myocyte apoptosis through mechanisms that involve a decrease in the phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase, mitochondrial Smac release, and increased expression of Bcl-2 and CREB.ope

    C-Reactive Protein Inhibits Survivin Expression via Akt/mTOR Pathway Downregulation by PTEN Expression in Cardiac Myocytes.

    Get PDF
    C-reactive protein (CRP) is one of the most important biomarkers for arteriosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Recent studies have shown that CRP affects cell cycle and inflammatory process in cardiac myocytes. Survivin is also involved in cardiac myocytes replication and apoptosis. Reduction of survivin expression is associated with less favorable cardiac remodeling in animal models. However, the effect of CRP on survivin expression and its cellular mechanism has not yet been studied. We demonstrated that treatment of CRP resulted in a significant decrease of survivin protein expression in a concentration-dependent manner in cardiac myocytes. The upstream signaling proteins of survivin, such as Akt, mTOR and p70S6K, were also downregulated by CRP treatment. In addition, CRP increased the protein and mRNA levels of PTEN. The siRNA transfection or specific inhibitor treatment for PTEN restored the CRP-induced downregulation of Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway and survivin protein expression. Moreover, pretreatment with a specific p53 inhibitor decreased the CRP-induced PTEN expression. ERK-specific inhibitor also blocked the p53 phosphorylation and PTEN expression induced by CRP. Our study provides a novel insight into CRP-induced downregulation of survivin protein expression in cardiac myocytes through mechanisms that involved in downregulation of Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway by expression of PTEN.ope

    Spinoza's Affect and the Mentally Disabled

    No full text

    An Impossible Other -A Critique of Jean-Luc Marion`s Thesis on the Alterity of the Ego-

    No full text
    이 글은 ν”„λž‘μŠ€μ˜ 데카λ₯΄νŠΈ μ—°κ΅¬μžμΈ μž₯-뀽 마리옹의 μ—κ³ μ˜ νƒ€μžμ„±λ‘ μ„ λΉ„νŒμ μœΌλ‘œ κ³ μ°°ν•˜λŠ” 것을 λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ μ‚Όκ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ 이 κΈ€μ—μ„œλŠ” 마리옹의 두 개의 논문을 μ€‘μ‹¬μ μœΌλ‘œ 닀루고 μžˆλ‹€. 마리옹의 에 고의 νƒ€μžμ„±λ‘ μ€ 데카λ₯΄νŠΈμ˜ μ—κ³ λŠ” κ·Όμ›μ μœΌλ‘œ νƒ€μΈκ³Όμ˜ λŒ€ν™”λΌλŠ” ν‹€ 속 에 μœ„μΉ˜ν•˜κ³  있으며, 이 λ•Œλ¬Έμ— 데카λ₯΄νŠΈ 철학은 νƒˆκ·ΌλŒ€μ„±μœΌλ‘œ μ§„μž…ν•˜λŠ” ν•˜λ‚˜μ˜ μž…κ΅¬κ°€ 될 수 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” μ£Όμž₯으둜 μš”μ•½λœλ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ κ·Έκ°€ μ£Όμž₯ν•˜λŠ” 에 고의 νƒ€μžμ„±λ‘ μ€ (1) ν…μŠ€νŠΈμƒμ˜ μ „κ±°κ°€ μ·¨μ•½ν•  뿐만 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ (2) ego sum, ego existo에 λŒ€ν•œ ν•΄μ„μ—μ„œ μ½”κΈ°ν† μ˜ κ²½ν—˜μ˜ μ²¨μ˜ˆν•¨μ„ μ•½ν™”μ‹œν‚€κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이에 따라 그의 μ—κ³ μ˜ νƒ€μžμ„±μ€ νƒ€μžμ„±μ„ μ‘΄μ€‘ν•œλ‹€λŠ” μ£Όμž₯에도 λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  κ²°κ΅­ νƒ€μžμ„±μ„ νμ‡„λœ 곡간 μ†μ—μ„œμ˜ νƒ€μžμ„±μœΌλ‘œ λ§Œλ“€κ³  만

    (A)Relationalist interpretation on the philosophy of Spinoza

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(박사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μ² ν•™κ³Ό μ„œμ–‘μ² ν•™μ „κ³΅,2006.Docto

    The Concept of Causa sui in Spinoza

    No full text
    This paper aims to elucidate the meaning of causa sui in Spinozas philosophy. The first philosopher who used this concept in a positive way was not Spinoza but Descartes. However, Spinoza was the first and the only philosopher who separated its use from the discourse of proving the existence of God, and so detheologized it. The term causa sui in the first part of Ethics signifies three things: First, it criticizes the transcendence of God; second, it provides the basis for immanent causality; third, it shows the non-reflexiveness of God or Nature

    DFT study of Pt surface for oxygen reduction reaction

    No full text

    μŠ€ν”Όλ…Έμž 철학에 λŒ€ν•œ 관계둠적 해석

    Get PDF
    λ‹€λ₯Έ λͺ¨λ“  μ² ν•™λ“€κ³Ό λ§ˆμ°¬κ°€μ§€λ‘œ μŠ€ν”Όλ…Έμžμ˜ μ² ν•™ μ—­μ‹œ ν•΄μ„μ˜ 역사, κ·Έ 영ν–₯의 μ—­μ‚¬λ‘œλΆ€ν„° μžμœ λ‘­μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜λ‹€. μ–΄λ–€ μ˜λ―Έμ—μ„œ μŠ€ν”Όλ…Έμžμ˜ 철학은 κ·Έ ν•΄μ„μ˜ 역사 영ν–₯사 μ•ˆμ—μ„œλ§Œ μ‹λ³„λ˜κ³  쑴립할 수 μžˆλ‹€κ³  ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μŠ€ν”Όλ…Έμž 철학에 λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ, λ”μš±μ΄ 그의 체계λ₯Ό ν¬κ΄„μ μœΌλ‘œ μž¬κ΅¬μ„±ν•΄λ³΄λ €κ³  μ‹œλ„ν•˜λŠ” μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” λ°˜λ“œμ‹œ κ·Έ ν•΄μ„μ˜ 역사에 λŒ€ν•œ μž¬ν•΄μ„κ³Ό 평가λ₯Ό 포함해야 ν•œλ‹€. 그렇지 μ•Šμ„ 경우, κ·Έ 연ꡬ가 μ£Όμž₯ν•˜λŠ” κ΄€μ μ˜ λ…μžμ„±μ€ 사싀은 주관적인 μ˜€ν•΄μ™€ 착각에 머무λ₯΄κ±°λ‚˜ μ•„λ‹ˆλ©΄ 이전에 μ œμ‹œλ˜μ—ˆλ˜ μ΄λŸ¬μ €λŸ¬ν•œ 해석을 μ§„λΆ€ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜ν’€μ΄ν•˜λŠ” ν•¨μ •μ—μ„œ λ²—μ–΄λ‚˜κΈ° μ–΄λ €μšΈ 것이닀. μš°λ¦¬κ°€ 이 λ…Όλ¬Έμ—μ„œ μŠ€ν”Όλ…Έμž 철학에 λŒ€ν•œ 관계둠적 해석을 μ œμ•ˆν•˜λ©΄μ„œ, 범신둠적 해석과 μ—­λŸ‰λ‘ μ  ν•΄μ„μ΄λΌλŠ” μŠ€ν”Όλ…Έμž 철학에 λŒ€ν•œ 두 가지 μ£Όμš”ν•œ ν•΄μ„μ˜ 흐름에 λŒ€ν•œ λΉ„νŒμ  뢄석을 우리 λ…Όλ¬Έμ˜ 본질적인 μΌλΆ€λ‘œ 삼은 μ΄μœ κ°€ λ°”λ‘œ 여기에 μžˆλ‹€
    corecore