125 research outputs found

    Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction for Structures Subjected to Earthquakes

    Get PDF
    An extended summary is presented of a state-of-the-art report on the subject matter. The report parallels one presented at the Fourth U. S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, in May 1990

    Influence of Higher Modes on Strength and Ductility Demands of Soil-Structure Systems

    Get PDF
    Due to the inherent complexity, the common approach in analysing nonlinear response of structures with soil-structure interaction (SSI) in current seismic provisions is based on equivalent SDOF systems (E-SDOF). This paper aims to study the influence of higher modes on the seismic response of SSI systems by performing intensive parametric analyses on more than 6400 linear and non-linear MDOF and E-SDOF systems subjected to 21 earthquake records. An established soil-shallow foundation-structure model with equivalent linear soil behaviour and nonlinear superstructure has been utilized using the concept of cone models. The lateral strength and ductility demands of MDOF soil-structure systems with different number of stories, structure-to-soil stiffness ratio, aspect ratio and level of inelasticity are compared to those of ESDOF systems. The results indicate that using the common E-SDOF soil-structure systems for estimating the strength and ductility demands of medium and slender MDOF structures can lead to very un-conservative results when SSI effect is significant. This implies the significance of higher mode effects for soil-structure systems in comparison with fixed-based structures, which is more pronounced for the cases of elastic and low level of inelasticity

    Comparative Assessment of Soil-Structure Interaction Regulations of ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 7-10

    Full text link
    This paper evaluates the consequences of practicing soil structure interaction (SSI) regulations of ASCE 7-16 on seismic performance of building structures. The motivation for this research stems from the significant changes in the new SSI provisions of ASCE 7-16 compared to the previous 2010 edition. Generally, ASCE 7 considers SSI as a beneficial effect, and allows designer to reduce the design base shear. However, literature shows that this idea cannot properly capture the SSI effects on nonlinear systems. ASCE 7-16 is the first edition of ASCE 7 that considers the SSI effect on yielding systems. This study investigates the consequences of practicing the new provisions on a wide range of buildings with different dynamic characteristics on different soil types. Ductility demand of the structure forms the performance metric of this study, and the probability that practicing SSI provisions, in lieu of fixed-base provisions, increases the ductility demand of the structure is computed. The analyses are conducted within a probabilistic framework which considers the uncertainties in the ground motion and in the properties of the soil-structure system. It is concluded that, for structures with surface foundation on moderate to soft soils, SSI regulations of both ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16 are fairly likely to result in a similar and larger structural responses than those obtained by practicing the fixed-base design regulations. However, for squat and ordinary stiff structures on soft soil or structures with embedded foundation on moderate to soft soils, the SSI provisions of ASCE 7-16 result in performance levels that are closer to those obtained by practicing the fixed-base regulations. Finally, for structures on very soft soils, the new SSI provisions of ASCE 7-16 are likely to rather conservative designs.Comment: ASCE Structures Congress, Fort Worth, TX, USA, April 19-21 (2018

    Evaluation of Torsional Provisions in Seismic Codes

    Full text link

    Dimensional response analysis of bilinear systems subjected to non-pulselike earthquake ground motions

    Get PDF
    The maximum inelastic response of bilinear single-degree-of-freedom systems when subjected to ground motions without distinguishable pulses is revisited with dimensional analysis by identifying time scales and length scales in the time histories of recorded ground motions. The characteristic length scale is used to normalize the peak inelastic displacement of the bilinear system. The paper adopts the mean period of the Fourier transform of the ground motion as an appropriate time scale and examines two different length scales which result from the peak ground acceleration and the peak ground velocity. When the normalized peak inelastic displacement is presented as a function of the normalized strength and normalized yield displacement, the response becomes self similar and a clear pattern emerges. Accordingly, the paper proposes two alternative predictive master curves for the response which involve solely the strength and yield displacement of the bilinear SDOF system in association with either the peak ground acceleration or the peak ground velocity, together with the mean period of the Fourier transform of the ground motion. The regression coefficients that control the shape of the predictive master curves are based on 484 ground motions recorded at rock and stiff soil sites and are applicable to bilinear SDOF systems with post-yield stiffness ratio equal to 2% and inherent viscous damping ratio equal to 5%
    • …