The incidence of fractures at various sites in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Purpose: In this descriptive study, we examined the incidence of fractures in patients with newly treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) compared to matched reference population. Methods: Participants from the UK Clinical Practice research datalink (CPRD) GOLD (1987–2017), aged ≥30 years, with a T2D diagnosis code and a first prescription for a non-insulin anti-diabetic drug (n = 124,328) were included. Cases with T2D were matched by year of birth, sex and practice to a reference population (n = 124,328), the mean follow-up was 7.7 years. Crude fracture incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by fracture site and sex and additionally adjusted for BMI, smoking status, alcohol use and history of any fracture at index date. Results: The IR of all fractures and major osteoporotic fractures was lower in T2D compared to the reference population (IRR 0.97; 95%CI 0.94–0.99). The IRs were lower for clavicle (IRR 0.67; 0.56–0.80), radius/ulna (IRR 0.81; 0.75–0.86) and vertebral fractures (0.83; 0.75–0.92) and higher for ankle (IRR 1.16; 95%CI 1.06–1.28), foot (1.11; 1.01–1.22), tibia/fibula (1.17; 1.03–1.32) and humerus fractures (1.11; 1.03–1.20). Differences in IRs at various fracture sites between T2D and the reference population were more pronounced in women than in men. In contrast, BMI adjusted IRs for all fractures (IRR 1.07; 1.04–1.10) and most individual fracture sites were significantly higher in T2D, especially in women. Conclusion: The crude incidence of all fractures was marginally lower in patients with newly treated T2D compared to the matched reference population but differed according to fracture site, especially in women. BMI adjusted analyses resulted in higher incidence rates in T2D at almost all fracture sites compared to crude incidence rates and this was more pronounced in women than in men. This implies that BMI may have a protective impact on the crude incidence of fractures, especially in women with newly treated T2D

Quantitative CT Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density in the Thoracic Spine on ¹⁸F-Fluorocholine PET/CT Imaging in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Introduction: Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with quantitative CT (QCT) carries several advantages over other densitometric techniques, including superior assessment of the spine. As most QCT studies evaluated the lumbar spine, measurements of the thoracic spine are limited. We performed QCT analysis of the thoracic spine in a cohort of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective QCT analysis of the thoracic spine on 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT scans in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism patients between March 2018 and December 2022. Correlations between QCT-derived BMD or Hounsfield units (HU) and demographic data, laboratory parameters, results from histopathological examination after parathyroidectomy and results of DXA imaging were analyzed, when available. Results: In 189 patients, mean QCT-derived BMD at the thoracic spine was 85.6 mg/cm3. Results from recent DXA were available in 122 patients. Mean thoracic QCT-derived BMD and HU were significantly correlated with DXA-derived BMD in lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck and with the lowest T-score at DXA imaging. Only weak correlations were found with BMI or 18F-fluorocholine uptake, while no significant correlations were found with adenoma weight, PTH or calcium levels. Conclusion: Our study confirms correlation between QCT-derived BMD in the thoracic spine with age and DXA-derived BMD measurements within a population of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Establishment of reference BMD values for individual thoracic vertebrae, may allow direct osteoporosis classification on thoracic CT imaging.</p

Serum 25(OH)D response to vitamin D3 supplementation: A meta-regression analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review factors that influence serum 25(OH)D when patients are given vitamin D supplements. METHODS: From a comprehensive search of all randomized controlled clinical trials with vitamin D3 supplementation available on PubMed up to November 2011, we selected 33 with 43 treatment arms that included at least 30 adult participants. The achieved pooled mean difference (PMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects models. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed for prespecified factors, including dose, duration, baseline serum 25(OH)D, and age. RESULTS: With a mean baseline serum 25(OH)D of 50.4 nmol/L, PMD was 37 nmol/L (95% CI, 33-41) with significant heterogeneity among studies. Dose (slope: 0.006; P /=800 IU/d (39.3 nmol/L) after 6 to 12 mo (41.7 nmol/L), with baseline 25(OH)D 80 y (40.5 nmol/L). CONCLUSION: This meta regression indicates that a higher increase in serum levels of 25(OH)D in adults is found with a dose of >/=800 IU/d, after at least 6 to 12 mo, and even when baseline 25(OH)D is low and in adults >80 y

The incidence of fractures at various sites in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Purpose: In this descriptive study, we examined the incidence of fractures in patients with newly treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) compared to matched reference population. Methods: Participants from the UK Clinical Practice research datalink (CPRD) GOLD (1987–2017), aged ≥30 years, with a T2D diagnosis code and a first prescription for a non-insulin anti-diabetic drug (n = 124,328) were included. Cases with T2D were matched by year of birth, sex and practice to a reference population (n = 124,328), the mean follow-up was 7.7 years. Crude fracture incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by fracture site and sex and additionally adjusted for BMI, smoking status, alcohol use and history of any fracture at index date. Results: The IR of all fractures and major osteoporotic fractures was lower in T2D compared to the reference population (IRR 0.97; 95%CI 0.94–0.99). The IRs were lower for clavicle (IRR 0.67; 0.56–0.80), radius/ulna (IRR 0.81; 0.75–0.86) and vertebral fractures (0.83; 0.75–0.92) and higher for ankle (IRR 1.16; 95%CI 1.06–1.28), foot (1.11; 1.01–1.22), tibia/fibula (1.17; 1.03–1.32) and humerus fractures (1.11; 1.03–1.20). Differences in IRs at various fracture sites between T2D and the reference population were more pronounced in women than in men. In contrast, BMI adjusted IRs for all fractures (IRR 1.07; 1.04–1.10) and most individual fracture sites were significantly higher in T2D, especially in women. Conclusion: The crude incidence of all fractures was marginally lower in patients with newly treated T2D compared to the matched reference population but differed according to fracture site, especially in women. BMI adjusted analyses resulted in higher incidence rates in T2D at almost all fracture sites compared to crude incidence rates and this was more pronounced in women than in men. This implies that BMI may have a protective impact on the crude incidence of fractures, especially in women with newly treated T2D