Atypical Development of Attentional Control Associates with Later Adaptive Functioning, Autism and ADHD Traits

Funder: H2020 European Research Council; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663Funder: Research Foundation FlandersFunder: Universiteit Gent; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004385Funder: Marguerite-Marie DelacroixFunder: Autistica; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011706Funder: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004472; Grant(s): NHS14-1802:1Funder: K.F. Hein FondsFunder: Scott Family Junior Research FellowshipAbstract: Autism is frequently associated with difficulties with top-down attentional control, which impact on individuals’ mental health and quality of life. The developmental processes involved in these attentional difficulties are not well understood. Using a data-driven approach, 2 samples (N = 294 and 412) of infants at elevated and typical likelihood of autism were grouped according to profiles of parent report of attention at 10, 15 and 25 months. In contrast to the normative profile of increases in attentional control scores between infancy and toddlerhood, a minority (7–9%) showed plateauing attentional control scores between 10 and 25 months. Consistent with pre-registered hypotheses, plateaued growth of attentional control was associated with elevated autism and ADHD traits, and lower adaptive functioning at age 3 years

Op weg naar ruimte en vrijheid: Crisis als aanleiding om inzicht te vergroten in (je) identiteitswerk

De coronacrisis schudt ons behoorlijk door elkaar. Veel van onze routines worden rigoureus doorbroken. Werk en privé verhouden zich heel anders tot elkaar. Veel vertrouwde manieren van werken ‘werken niet meer’, en zorg en onzekerheid dringen zich op allerlei manieren op. Misschien zijn we ons er nog niet altijd van bewust, maar in deze crisis staat ook onze (professionele) identiteit onder druk: wie ben jij nu in dit nieuwe geheel? Waar je wellicht in je werk herkend en erkend werd en je ook wist wat je waarde was, is ‘werk’ in een nieuw vaarwater beland. Je hebt je opnieuw te verhouden, moet andere wegen zoeken om meerwaarde te leveren, andere manieren om je werk ‘goed’ te doen. Al die veranderingen leveren identiteitswerk op. Dit ‘identiteitswerk’ gaat de een gemakkelijk af: je voelt je vrij om te zijn wie je wilt zijn, de nieuwe werksituatie heeft misschien zelfs spanningen weggehaald (wat ook aan het denken zet). Voor de ander is het lastiger: je ervaart juist minder ruimte en vrijheid om je te laten zien zoals je graag zou willen; je houdt je in, je voelt je onzeker of je trekt je maar terug. Voor beide geldt: elke crisis biedt ook mogelijkheden. Voor professionals die dit herkennen en vragen hebben over wie ze eigenlijk zijn of willen zijn in deze ongewone tijd hebben we deze white paper geschreven. Maar ook voor hen die geïnteresseerd zijn in professionele identiteit en de impact die het kan hebben op mens en organisatie, of misschien op zoek zijn naar manieren om de vraagstukken die ontstaan op te vangen. Wij hopen dat de gedachten in deze paper helpen om meer stevigheid en veerkracht te ontwikkelen, voor jezelf of in je hulp aan anderen, ook voor de periode daarna

Self-initiations in young children with autism during Pivotal Response Treatment with and without robot assistance

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Pivotal Response Treatment versus robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment on self-initiations of children with autism spectrum disorder and to explore the relation between self-initiations and collateral gains in general social-communicative skills. Forty-four participants with autism spectrum disorder aged 3–8 years (Pivotal Response Treatment: n = 20, Pivotal Response Treatment + robot: n = 24), who were recruited as part of a larger randomized controlled trial (number NL4487/NTR4712, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4487), were included. Self-initiations were blindly coded, assessing video probes of all parent–child sessions using an event-recording system. General social-communicative skills were assessed with the parent- and teacher-rated Social Responsiveness Scale during intervention and at 3-month follow-up. Results using linear mixed-effects models showed overall gains in self-initiations during both Pivotal Response Treatment intervention groups (estimate = 0.43(0.15), 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13–0.73), with larger gains in functional self-initiations in children receiving robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment (estimate = −0.27(0.12), 95% confidence interval: −0.50 to −0.04). Growth in self-initiations was related to higher parent-rated social awareness at follow-up compared with baseline in the total sample (r = −0.44, p = 0.011). The clinical implications of these findings, as well as directions for future research in the utility of Pivotal Response Treatment and robot assistance in autism spectrum disorder intervention, are discussed. Lay abstract: The initiation of social interaction is often defined as a core deficit of autism spectrum disorder. Optimizing these self-initiations is therefore a key component of Pivotal Response Treatment, an established intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder. However, little is known about the development of self-initiations during intervention and whether this development can be facilitated by robot assistance within Pivotal Response Treatment. The aim of this study was to (1) investigate the effect of Pivotal Response Treatment and robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment on self-initiations (functional and social) of young children with autism spectrum disorder over the course of intervention and (2) explore the relation between development in self-initiations and additional gains in general social-communicative skills. Forty-four children with autism spectrum disorder (aged 3–8 years) were included in this study. Self-initiations were assessed during parent–child interaction videos of therapy sessions and coded by raters who did not know which treatment (Pivotal Response Treatment or robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment) the child received. General social-communicative skills were assessed before start of the treatment, after 10 and 20 weeks of intervention and 3 months after the treatment was finalized. Results showed that self-initiations increased in both treatment groups, with the largest improvements in functional self-initiations in the group that received robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment. Increased self-initiations were related to higher parent-rated social awareness 3 months after finalizing the treatment

Pivotal Response Treatment with and without robot-assistance for children with autism: a randomized controlled trial

Pivotal response treatment (PRT) is a promising intervention focused on improving social communication skills in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Since robots potentially appeal to children with ASD and may contribute to their motivation for social interaction, this exploratory randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted comparing PRT (PRT and robot-assisted PRT) with treatment-as-usual (TAU). Seventy-three children (PRT: n = 25; PRT + robot: n = 25; TAU: n = 23) with ASD, aged 3–8 years were assessed at baseline, after 10 and 20 weeks of intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. There were no significant group differences on parent- and teacher-rated general social-communicative skills and blindly rated global functioning directly after treatment. However, at follow-up largest gains were observed in robot-assisted PRT compared to other groups. These results suggest that robot-assistance may contribute to intervention efficacy for children with ASD when using game scenarios for robot-child interaction during multiple sessions combined with motivational components of PRT. This trial is registered at https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4487; NL4487/NTR4712 (2014-08-01)

The effects of long-term child–robot interaction on the attention and the engagement of children with autism

Using a social robot has been proven to have multiple benefits for the training of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, there is no clarity on the impact of the interaction quality between a child with ASD and a robot on the effectiveness of the therapy. Previous research showed that the use of a robot in Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) could be an effective treatment component in diminishing ASD-related symptoms. Further analyzing the data from a randomized controlled trial of PRT treatment, we looked at the long-term effects of child–robot game interactions to see whether the interaction quality changes over time. The attention and the engagement of six children were measured through the observation of non-verbal behavior at three different stages in the treatment that took 20 sessions per child. The gaze and arm/hand behavior of the participants towards the robot, the game, and other present humans were observed. The analysis showed no significant decrease in the attention and the engagement of the children towards the robot and the game. However, the attention and engagement toward the parents of the children increased. We conclude that the main result of sustained attention and engagement with the robot is due to the personalization of the games to meet the specific needs of this user group. These specific needs are met through inclusion of variability to the level of development and personal choice of each participating child. We see the additional finding of increased attention towards the parents as especially positive since the children are expected to improve in human–human interaction as a result of this treatment

The Effects of Long-Term Child-Robot Interaction on the Attention and the Engagement of Children with Autism

Contains fulltext : 228738.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Adherence and acceptability of a robot-assisted Pivotal Response Treatment protocol for children with autism spectrum disorder

The aim of this study is to present a robot-assisted therapy protocol for children with ASD based on the current state-of-the-art in both ASD intervention research and robotics research, and critically evaluate its adherence and acceptability based on child as well as parent ratings. The robot-assisted therapy was designed based on motivational components of Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), a highly promising and feasible intervention focused at training “pivotal” (key) areas such as motivation for social interaction and self-initiations, with the goal of establishing collateral gains in untargeted areas of functioning and development, affected by autism spectrum disorders. Overall, children (3–8 y) could adhere to the robot-assisted therapy protocol (Mean percentage of treatment adherence 85.5%), showed positive affect ratings after therapy sessions (positive in 86.6% of sessions) and high robot likability scores (high in 79.4% of sessions). Positive likability ratings were mainly given by school-aged children (H(1) = 7.91, p =.005) and related to the movements, speech and game scenarios of the robot. Parent ratings on the added value of the robot were mainly positive (Mean of 84.8 on 0–100 scale), while lower parent ratings were related to inflexibility of robot behaviour

Atypical Development of Attentional Control Associates with Later Adaptive Functioning, Autism and ADHD Traits

Funder: H2020 European Research Council; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663Funder: Research Foundation FlandersFunder: Universiteit Gent; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004385Funder: Marguerite-Marie DelacroixFunder: Autistica; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011706Funder: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004472; Grant(s): NHS14-1802:1Funder: K.F. Hein FondsFunder: Scott Family Junior Research FellowshipAbstract: Autism is frequently associated with difficulties with top-down attentional control, which impact on individuals’ mental health and quality of life. The developmental processes involved in these attentional difficulties are not well understood. Using a data-driven approach, 2 samples (N = 294 and 412) of infants at elevated and typical likelihood of autism were grouped according to profiles of parent report of attention at 10, 15 and 25 months. In contrast to the normative profile of increases in attentional control scores between infancy and toddlerhood, a minority (7–9%) showed plateauing attentional control scores between 10 and 25 months. Consistent with pre-registered hypotheses, plateaued growth of attentional control was associated with elevated autism and ADHD traits, and lower adaptive functioning at age 3 years