Highly-parallelized simulation of a pixelated LArTPC on a GPU

The rapid development of general-purpose computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU) is allowing the implementation of highly-parallelized Monte Carlo simulation chains for particle physics experiments. This technique is particularly suitable for the simulation of a pixelated charge readout for time projection chambers, given the large number of channels that this technology employs. Here we present the first implementation of a full microphysical simulator of a liquid argon time projection chamber (LArTPC) equipped with light readout and pixelated charge readout, developed for the DUNE Near Detector. The software is implemented with an end-to-end set of GPU-optimized algorithms. The algorithms have been written in Python and translated into CUDA kernels using Numba, a just-in-time compiler for a subset of Python and NumPy instructions. The GPU implementation achieves a speed up of four orders of magnitude compared with the equivalent CPU version. The simulation of the current induced on 10^3 pixels takes around 1 ms on the GPU, compared with approximately 10 s on the CPU. The results of the simulation are compared against data from a pixel-readout LArTPC prototype

Search for single vector-like B quark production and decay via B → bH(b¯b) in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

A search is presented for single production of a vector-like B quark decaying into a Standard Model b-quark and a Standard Model Higgs boson, which decays into a b¯b pair. The search is carried out in 139 fb−1 of √s = 13 TeV proton-proton collision data collected by the ATLAS detector at the LHC between 2015 and 2018. No significant deviation from the Standard Model background prediction is observed, and mass-dependent exclusion limits at the 95% confidence level are set on the resonance production cross-section in several theoretical scenarios determined by the couplings cW, cZ and cH between the B quark and the Standard Model W, Z and Higgs bosons, respectively. For a vector-like B occurring as an isospin singlet, the search excludes values of cW greater than 0.45 for a B resonance mass (mB) between 1.0 and 1.2 TeV. For 1.2 TeV < mB < 2.0 TeV, cW values larger than 0.50–0.65 are excluded. If the B occurs as part of a (B, Y) doublet, the smallest excluded cZ coupling values range between 0.3 and 0.5 across the investigated resonance mass range 1.0 TeV < mB < 2.0 TeV

Population characteristics associated with adherence to prenatal group-based exercise programs

Referencias bibliográficas • Adamo, K. B., Ferraro, Z. M., Goldfield, G., Keely, E., Stacey, D., Hadjiyannakis, S., Jean-Philippe, S., Walker, M., & Barrowman, N. J. (2013). The Maternal Obesity Management (MOM) trial protocol: A lifestyle intervention during pregnancy to minimize downstream obesity. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 35 (1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.02.010 • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). ACOG committee opinion No. 650: Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 126 (6), e135–e42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001214 • Barakat, D.-B. A., Franco, E., Rollán-Malmierca, A., Brik, M., Vargas, M., et al. (2019). Guías clínicas para el ejercicio físico durante el embarazo. Progresos Obstet y Ginecol, 62 (5), 464–471 doi: 10.20960/j.pog.00231. • Barakat, R., Pelaez, M., Cordero, Y., Perales, M., Lopez, C., Coteron, J., & Mottola, M. F. (2016). Exercise during pregnancy protects against hypertension and macrosomia: Randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 214 (5), 649 e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.039 • Barakat, R., Pelaez, M., Lopez, C., Lucia, A., & Ruiz, J. R. (2013). Exercise during pregnancy and gestational diabetes-related adverse effects: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47 (10), 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091788 • Barakat, R., Ruiz, J. R., & Lucia, A. (2009). Exercise during pregnancy and risk of maternal anaemia: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43 (12), 954–956. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.055764 • Borodulin, K. M., Evenson, K. R., Wen, F., Herring, A. H., & Benson, A. M. (2008). Physical activity patterns during pregnancy. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40 (11), 1901–1908. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817f1957 • Bruno, R., Petrella, E., Bertarini, V., Pedrielli, G., Neri, I., & Facchinetti, F. (2017). Adherence to a lifestyle programme in overweight/obese pregnant women and effect on gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13 (3), e12333. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12333 • Chasan-Taber, L., Schmidt, M. D., Pekow, P., Sternfeld, B., Manson, J., & Markenson, G. (2007). Correlates of physical activity in pregnancy among Latina women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11 (4), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0201-8 • Cheng, J. K. (2012). Confronting the social determinants of health–obesity, neglect, and inequity. The New England Journal of Medicine, 367 (21), 1976–1977. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1209420 • Coll, C. V., Domingues, M. R., Gonçalves, H., & Bertoldi, A. D. (2017). Perceived barriers to leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy: A literature review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20 (1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.007 • Cordero, Y., Mottola, M. F., Vargas, J., Blanco, M., & Barakat, R. (2015). Exercise is associated with a reduction in gestational diabetes mellitus. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47 (7), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000547 • Da Costa, D., & Ireland, K. (2013). Perceived benefits and barriers to leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy in previously inactive and active women. Women & Health, 53 (2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2012.758219 • Davenport, M. H., McCurdy, A. P., Mottola, M. F., Skow, R. J., Meah, V. L., Poitras, V. J., et al. (2018). Impact of prenatal exercise on both prenatal and postnatal anxiety and depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52 (21), 1376–1385. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099697 • Davenport, M. H., Ruchat, S. M., Mottola, M. F., Davies, G. A., Poitras, V. J., Gray, C. E., Garcia, A. J., Barrowman, N., Adamo, K. B., Duggan, M., Barakat, R., Chilibeck, P., Fleming, K., Forte, M., Korolnek, J., Nagpal, T., Slater, L. G., Stirling, D., & Zehr, L. (2018). 2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy: Methodology. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal D’obstetrique Et Gynecologie du Canada: JOGC, 40 (11), 1468–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.004 • Davenport, M. H., Ruchat, S. M., Sobierajski, F., Poitras, V. J., Gray, C. E., Yoo, C., Skow, R. J., Jaramillo Garcia, A., Barrowman, N., Meah, V. L., Nagpal, T. S., Riske, L., James, M., Nuspl, M., Weeks, A., Marchand, -A.-A., Slater, L. G., Adamo, K. B., Davies, G. A., … Mottola, M. F. (2019). Impact of prenatal exercise on maternal harms, labour and delivery outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53 (2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099821 • Davies, G. A., Wolfe, L. A., Mottola, M. F., & MacKinnon, C. (2003). Joint SOGC/CSEP clinical practice guideline: Exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology = Revue Canadienne de Physiologie Appliquee, 28 (3), 330–341 doi: 10.1139/h03-024. • Ekelin, M., Langeland Iversen, M., Grønbæk Backhausen, M., & Hegaard, H. K. (2018). Not now but later - a qualitative study of non-exercising pregnant women’s views and experiences of exercise. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18 (1), 399. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2035-3 • El Ansari, W., & Lovell, G. (2009). Barriers to exercise in younger and older non-exercising adult women: A cross sectional study in London. United Kingdom. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6 (4), 1443–1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6041443 • Evenson, K. R., & Bradley, C. B. (2010). Beliefs about exercise and physical activity among pregnant women. Patient Education and Counseling, 79 (1), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.028 • Ferraro, Z. M., Gaudet, L., & Adamo, K. B. (2012). The potential impact of physical activity during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 67 (2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e318242030e • Flannery, C., McHugh, S., Anaba, A. E., Clifford, E., O’Riordan, M., Kenny, L. C., McAuliffe, F. M., Kearney, P. M., & Byrne, M. (2018). Enablers and barriers to physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women: An analysis informed by the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18 (1), 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1816-z • Garnæs, K. K., Helvik, A. S., Stafne, S. N., Mørkved, S., Salvesen, K., Salvesen, Ø., & Moholdt, T. (2019). Effects of supervised exercise training during pregnancy on psychological well-being among overweight and obese women: Secondary analyses of the ETIP-trial, a randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 9 (11), e028252. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028252 • Gaston, A., & Cramp, A. (2011). Exercise during pregnancy: A review of patterns and determinants. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14 (4), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.02.006 • Haakstad, L. A., Sanda, B., Vistad, I., Sagedal, L. R., Seiler, H. L., & Torstveit, M. K. (2017). Evaluation of implementing a community-based exercise intervention during pregnancy. Midwifery, 46, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.010 • Harrison, A. L., Taylor, N. F., Shields, N., & Frawley, H. C. (2018). Attitudes, barriers and enablers to physical activity in pregnant women: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 64 (1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2017.11.012 • Koleilat, M., Vargas, N., vanTwist, V., & Kodjebacheva, G. D. (2021). Perceived barriers to and suggested interventions for physical activity during pregnancy among participants of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in Southern California. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21 (1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03553-7 • Kominiarek, M. A. (2014). A survey of health behaviors in minority women in pregnancy: The influence of body mass index. Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 24 (3), e291–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.007 • Makaruk, B., Galczak-Kondraciuk, A., Forczek, W., Grantham, W., & Charmas, M. (2019). The effectiveness of regular exercise programs in the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus-A systematic review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 74 (5), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000673 • McDonald, S. M., Liu, J., Wilcox, S., Lau, E. Y., & Archer, E. (2016). Does dose matter in reducing gestational weight gain in exercise interventions? A systematic review of literature. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19 (4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.03.004 • Mottola, M. F., Davenport, M. H., Ruchat, S. M., Davies, G. A., Poitras, V., Gray, C., Jaramillo Garcia, A., Barrowman, N., Adamo, K. B., Duggan, M., Barakat, R., Chilibeck, P., Fleming, K., Forte, M., Korolnek, J., Nagpal, T., Slater, L., Stirling, D., & Zehr, L. (2018). No. 367-2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal D’obstetrique Et Gynecologie du Canada: JOGC, 40 (11), 1528–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.001 • Nagpal, T. S., & Mottola, M. F. (2020). Physical activity throughout pregnancy is key to preventing chronic disease. Reproduction (Cambridge, England), 160 (5), R111–R8. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-20-0337 • Nagpal, T. S., Prapavessis, H., Campbell, C. G., de Vrijer, B., Bgeginski, R., Hosein, K., Paplinskie, S., Manley, M., & Mottola, M. F. (2020). Sequential introduction of exercise first followed by nutrition improves program adherence during pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 27 (1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09840-0 • Nagpal, T. S., Prapavessis, H., Campbell, C., & Mottola, M. F. (2017). Measuring adherence to a nutrition and exercise lifestyle intervention: Is program adherence related to excessive gestational weight gain? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10 (4), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0189-5 • Nagpal, T. S., Souza, S. C. S., da Silva, D. F., & Adamo, K. B. (2020). Taking a patient-oriented approach in exercise interventions for pregnant women: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Sante Publique, 112 (3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00438-8 • Nagpal, T. S., Souza, S. C. S., da Silva, D. F., Ferraro, Z. M., Sharma, A. M., & Adamo, K. B. (2021). Widespread misconceptions about pregnancy for women living with obesity. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 67 (2), 85–87. https://doi.org/10.46747/cfp.670285 • Nasiri-Amiri, F., Sepidarkish, M., Shirvani, M. A., Habibipour, P., & Tabari, N. S. M. (2019). The effect of exercise on the prevention of gestational diabetes in obese and overweight pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 11, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0470-6 • Pelaez, M., Gonzalez-Cerron, S., Montejo, R., & Barakat, R. (2014). Pelvic floor muscle training included in a pregnancy exercise program is effective in primary prevention of urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 33 (1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22381 • Petersen, A. M., Leet, T. L., & Brownson, R. C. (2005). Correlates of physical activity among pregnant women in the United States. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37 (10), 1748–1753. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000181302.97948.90 • Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Pearl, R. L. (2020). Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity. The American Psychologist, 75 (2), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000538 • Rogozińska, E., Marlin, N., Jackson, L., Rayanagoudar, G., Ruifrok, A. E., Dodds, J., et al. (2017). Effects of antenatal diet and physical activity on maternal and fetal outcomes: Individual patient data meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 21 (41), 1–158. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21410 • Ruchat, S. M., Mottola, M. F., Skow, R. J., Nagpal, T. S., Meah, V. L., James, M., Riske, L., Sobierajski, F., Kathol, A. J., Marchand, -A.-A., Nuspl, M., Weeks, A., Gray, C. E., Poitras, V. J., Jaramillo Garcia, A., Barrowman, N., Slater, L. G., Adamo, K. B., Davies, G. A., … Davenport, M. H. (2018). Effectiveness of exercise interventions in the prevention of excessive gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52 (21), 1347–1356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099399 • Russell, A., Gillespie, S., Satya, S., & Gaudet, L. M. (2013). Assessing the accuracy of pregnant women in recalling pre-pregnancy weight and gestational weight gain. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC = Journal D’obstetrique Et Gynecologie du Canada: JOGC, 35 (9), 802–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30836-7 • Santos, P. C., Abreu, S., Moreira, C., Lopes, D., Santos, R., Alves, O., Silva, P., Montenegro, N., & Mota, J. (2014). Impact of compliance with different guidelines on physical activity during pregnancy and perceived barriers to leisure physical activity. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32 (14), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.893369 • Yang, Y., & Koenigstorfer, J. (2020). Determinants of physical activity maintenance during the Covid-19 pandemic: A focus on fitness apps. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10 (4), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa086Community-based supervised group exercise may be an effective option to increase activity levels throughout pregnancy. Previous studies that have explored predictors of low adherence to exercise during pregnancy have not examined group-based settings. We analysed an international cohort of 347 pregnant women who participated in group-based prenatal exercise interventions (from <20 weeks to 34–36 weeks pregnant). Probable adherence predictors informed by previous literature that were assessed included: pre-pregnancy physical activity level and body mass index (BMI) classification, age, number of previous pregnancies, and education level. Adherence was measured by attendance. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to explore the relationship between the selected predictors and high adherence (≥70%). Post-secondary education level versus only secondary (aOR 5.28; CI 1.67; 16.72) or primary level (aOR 13.82; CI 4.30; 44.45) presented greater likelihood to have high adherence to the exercise intervention than low adherence. Future research and public health initiatives should consider implementing strategies to overcome education-related barriers to improve accessibility to prenatal exercise.Depto. de Didáctica de las Lenguas, Artes y Educación FísicaFac. de EducaciónTRUEpu

Autoantibodies targeting G protein-coupled receptors: an evolving history in autoimmunity. Report of the 4th international symposium

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are involved in various physiological and pathophysiological processes. Functional autoantibodies targeting GPCRs have been associated with multiple disease manifestations in this context. Here we summarize and discuss the relevant findings and concepts presented in the biennial International Meeting on autoantibodies targeting GPCRs (the 4th Symposium), held in Lübeck, Germany, 15-16 September 2022. The symposium focused on the current knowledge of these autoantibodies' role in various diseases, such as cardiovascular, renal, infectious (COVID-19), and autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus). Beyond their association with disease phenotypes, intense research related to the mechanistic action of these autoantibodies on immune regulation and pathogenesis has been developed, underscoring the role of autoantibodies targeting GPCRs on disease outcomes and etiopathogenesis. The observation repeatedly highlighted that autoantibodies targeting GPCRs could also be present in healthy individuals, suggesting that anti-GPCR autoantibodies play a physiologic role in modeling the course of diseases. Since numerous therapies targeting GPCRs have been developed, including small molecules and monoclonal antibodies designed for treating cancer, infections, metabolic disorders, or inflammatory conditions, anti-GPCR autoantibodies themselves can serve as therapeutic targets to reduce patients' morbidity and mortality, representing a new area for the development of novel therapeutic interventions