Identifying Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Information on the pathophysiological differences between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) versus heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is needed Objectives: The purpose of this study was to establish biological pathways specifically related to HFrEF and HFpEF. Methods: The authors performed a network analysis to identify unique biomarker correlations in HFrEF and HFpEF using 92 biomarkers from different pathophysiological domains in a cohort of 1,544 heart failure (HF) patients. Data were independently validated in 804 patients with HF. Networks were enriched with existing knowledge on protein–protein interactions and translated into biological pathways uniquely related to HFrEF, HF with a midrange ejection fraction, and HFpEF. Results: In the index cohort (mean age 74 years; 34% female), 718 (47%) patients had HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%) and 431 (27%) patients had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). A total of 8 (12%) correlations were unique for HFrEF and 6 (9%) were unique to HFpEF. Central proteins in HFrEF were N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-1 receptor type 1, and activating transcription factor 2, while central proteins in HFpEF were integrin subunit beta-2 and catenin beta-1. Biological pathways in HFrEF were related to DNA binding transcription factor activity, cellular protein metabolism, and regulation of nitric oxide biosynthesis. Unique pathways in patients with HFpEF were related to cytokine response, extracellular matrix organization, and inflammation. Biological pathways of patients with HF with a midrange ejection fraction were in between HFrEF and HFpEF. Conclusions: Network analysis showed that biomarker profiles specific for HFrEF are related to cellular proliferation and metabolism, whereas biomarker profiles specific for HFpEF are related to inflammation and extracellular matrix reorganization. (The BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure [BIOSTAT-CHF]; EudraCT 2010-020808-29

Novel Endotypes in Heart Failure:Effects on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy

Aims: We sought to determine subtypes of patients with heart failure (HF) with a distinct clinical profile and treatment response, using a wide range of biomarkers from various pathophysiological domains. Methods and results: We performed unsupervised cluster analysis using 92 established cardiovascular biomarkers to identify mutually exclusive subgroups (endotypes) of 1802 patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the BIOSTAT-CHF project. We validated our findings in an independent cohort of 813 patients. Based on their biomarker profile, six endotypes were identified. Patients with endotype 1 were youngest, less symptomatic, had the lowest N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and lowest risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF. Patients with endotype 4 had more severe symptoms and signs of HF, higher NT-proBNP levels and were at highest risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–1.8]. Patients with endotypes 2, 3, and 5 were better uptitrated to target doses of beta-blockers (P &lt; 0.02 for all). In contrast to other endotypes, patients with endotype 5 derived no potential survival benefit from uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker and beta-blockers (Pinteraction &lt;0.001). Patients with endotype 2 (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.10–1.42) experienced possible harm from uptitration of beta-blockers in contrast to patients with endotype 4 and 6 that experienced benefit (Pinteraction for all &lt;0.001). Results were strikingly similar in the independent validation cohort. Conclusion: Using unsupervised cluster analysis, solely based on biomarker profiles, six distinct endotypes were identified with remarkable differences in characteristics, clinical outcome, and response to uptitration of guideline directed medical therapy

Genome-wide association study identifies loci on 12q24 and 13q32 associated with Tetralogy of Fallot

We conducted a genome-wide association study to search for risk alleles associated with Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), using a northern European discovery set of 835 cases and 5159 controls. A region on chromosome 12q24 was associated (P = 1.4 × 10−7) and replicated convincingly (P = 3.9 × 10−5) in 798 cases and 2931 controls [per allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.27 in replication cohort, P = 7.7 × 10−11 in combined populations]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the glypican 5 gene on chromosome 13q32 were also associated (P = 1.7 × 10−7) and replicated convincingly (P = 1.2 × 10−5) in 789 cases and 2927 controls (per allele OR = 1.31 in replication cohort, P = 3.03 × 10−11 in combined populations). Four additional regions on chromosomes 10, 15 and 16 showed suggestive association accompanied by nominal replication. This study, the first genome-wide association study of a congenital heart malformation phenotype, provides evidence that common genetic variation influences the risk of TO

The prevalence of severe refractory asthma

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma is characterized by difficulty to achieve disease control despite high-intensity treatment. However, prevalence figures of severe asthma are lacking, whereas longstanding estimates vary between 5% and 10% of all asthmatic patients. Knowing the exact prevalence of severe refractory asthma as opposed to difficult-to-control asthma is important for clinical decision making, drug development, and reimbursement policies by health authorities. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate the prevalence of severe refractory asthma as defined by the Innovative Medicine Initiative consensus. METHODS: Adult patients with a prescription for high-intensity treatment (high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists or medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids combined with oral corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists) were extracted from 65 Dutch pharmacy databases, representing 3% of the population (500,500 inhabitants). Questionnaires were sent to 5,002 patients, of which 2,312 were analyzed. The diagnosis of asthma and degree of asthma control were derived from questionnaires to identify patients with difficult-to-control asthma. Inhalation technique was assessed in a random sample of 60 adherent patients (prescription filling, ≥80%). Patients with difficult-to-control asthma, adherence to treatment, and a correct inhalation technique were qualified as having severe refractory asthma. Results were mirrored to the Dutch population. RESULTS: Of asthmatic adults, 3.6% (95% CI, 3.0% to 4.1%) qualified for a diagnosis of severe refractory asthma, representing 10.4 patients per 10,000 inhabitants. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of severe refractory asthma might be lower than estimated by expert opinion. This implies that currently recognized severe asthma subphenotypes could meet the criteria of rare diseases

The prevalence of severe refractory asthma

Severe asthma is characterized by difficulty to achieve disease control despite high-intensity treatment. However, prevalence figures of severe asthma are lacking, whereas longstanding estimates vary between 5% and 10% of all asthmatic patients. Knowing the exact prevalence of severe refractory asthma as opposed to difficult-to-control asthma is important for clinical decision making, drug development, and reimbursement policies by health authorities. We sought to estimate the prevalence of severe refractory asthma as defined by the Innovative Medicine Initiative consensus. Adult patients with a prescription for high-intensity treatment (high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists or medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids combined with oral corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists) were extracted from 65 Dutch pharmacy databases, representing 3% of the population (500,500 inhabitants). Questionnaires were sent to 5,002 patients, of which 2,312 were analyzed. The diagnosis of asthma and degree of asthma control were derived from questionnaires to identify patients with difficult-to-control asthma. Inhalation technique was assessed in a random sample of 60 adherent patients (prescription filling, ≥80%). Patients with difficult-to-control asthma, adherence to treatment, and a correct inhalation technique were qualified as having severe refractory asthma. Results were mirrored to the Dutch population. Of asthmatic adults, 3.6% (95% CI, 3.0% to 4.1%) qualified for a diagnosis of severe refractory asthma, representing 10.4 patients per 10,000 inhabitants. The prevalence of severe refractory asthma might be lower than estimated by expert opinion. This implies that currently recognized severe asthma subphenotypes could meet the criteria of rare disease

A Decade of Surgically Removed Small Renal Masses in The Netherlands: Characteristics and Trends in Type of Surgery and Pathologic Reporting

Purpose: To assess nationwide the pathologic characteristics and trends in type of surgery and pathologic reporting in surgically managed renal tumors = T-3). Tumors <= 3.0 cm were more likely to be benign (P = 0.006) and of lower stage (P = <0.001) than tumors of 3.1 to 4 cm. PN was performed in 16.5% of the cases. Grade and subtype were reported in 55% of the cases. The rate of PNs performed increased during the decade. There was a trend in increased reporting of grade and subtype. Conclusions: A quarter of all the operated primary kidney tumors were <= 4 cm. Smaller tumors were more likely to be benign and of lower stage. A cutoff size regarding biologic aggressiveness can be settled at the 3 cm size. The PN rate increased along the decade. Grade and subtype reporting rates remained suboptimal, although a positive trend was note

Preoperative prediction of the occurrence and severity of complications after esophagectomy for cancer with use of a nomogram

BACKGROUND: Predicting the severity of complications after esophagectomy may supply important information for both patient and surgeon. The aim of the present study was to develop a nomogram based on preoperative risk factors to predict the severity of complications in patients who undergo esophagectomy for cancer. METHODS: A consecutive series of 663 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 1993 and August 2005 was used to develop a prognostic model. The model was validated in a second group of patients who were operated between August 2005 and November 2006. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the severity of complications. Diverse simple and conventional preoperative risk factors were evaluated. A nomogram was developed to enhance clinical applicability. RESULTS: Patients were divided into three complication categories: those who suffered from no complications (n = 197); minor complications (n = 354); and major complications (n = 112). The following predictors remained in the model after multivariate analysis: higher age (p = 0.014); cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack (CVA/TIA) (p = 0.009) or myocardial infarction in the medical history (p = 0.066); lower forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV(1)) (p = 0.030); presence of electrocardiogram-changes (p = 0.008); and more extensive surgery (p < 0.001). A nomogram based on these variables was constructed. Overall agreement between the predicted probabilities and the observed frequencies was good in the development and the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram predicts the severity of complications for individual patients and may help in informing the patient before undergoing esophagectomy for cancer and in choosing the optimal extent of surgery. When externally validated, the nomogram may play a role in risk-adjusted audit of morbidity after esophagectom

Genome-wide association study identifies loci on 12q24 and 13q32 associated with tetralogy of Fallot

We conducted a genome-wide association study to search for risk alleles associated with Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), using a northern European discovery set of 835 cases and 5159 controls. A region on chromosome 12q24 was associated (P = 1.4 × 10(-7)) and replicated convincingly (P = 3.9 × 10(-5)) in 798 cases and 2931 controls [per allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.27 in replication cohort, P = 7.7 × 10(-11) in combined populations]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the glypican 5 gene on chromosome 13q32 were also associated (P = 1.7 × 10(-7)) and replicated convincingly (P = 1.2 × 10(-5)) in 789 cases and 2927 controls (per allele OR = 1.31 in replication cohort, P = 3.03 × 10(-11) in combined populations). Four additional regions on chromosomes 10, 15 and 16 showed suggestive association accompanied by nominal replication. This study, the first genome-wide association study of a congenital heart malformation phenotype, provides evidence that common genetic variation influences the risk of TOF

Comparison of treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: In patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, initial combination therapies provide earlier clinical improvement and less progression of joint damage after 1 year compared with initial monotherapies (as demonstrated in the BeSt study). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the initial clinical and radiographic efficacy of combination therapies could be maintained during the second year of follow-up in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled clinical trial with blinded assessors. SETTING: 18 peripheral and 2 university medical centers in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 508 patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis. INTERVENTION: Sequential monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with tapered high-dose prednisone (group 3), or initial combination therapy with infliximab (group 4). Trimonthly treatment adjustments were made to achieve low disease activity. MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and Sharp-van der Heijde score for radiographic joint damage. RESULTS: Groups 3 and 4 had more rapid clinical improvement during the first year; all groups improved further to a mean functional ability score of 0.6 (overall, P = 0.257) and 42% were in remission (overall, P = 0.690) during the second year. Progression of joint damage remained better suppressed in groups 3 and 4 (median scores of 2.0, 2.0, 1.0, and 1.0 in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively [P = 0.004]). After 2 years, 33%, 31%, 36%, and 53% of patients in groups 1 through 4, respectively, were receiving single-drug therapy for initial treatment. There were no significant differences in toxicity. LIMITATIONS: Patients and physicians were aware of the allocated group, and the assessors were blinded. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available antirheumatic drugs can be highly effective in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in a setting of tight disease control. Initial combination therapies seem to provide earlier clinical improvement and less progression of joint damage, but all treatment strategies eventually showed similar clinical improvements. In addition, combination therapy can be withdrawn successfully and less treatment adjustments are needed than with initial monotherapie