Impact of the policy environment on substance use among sexual minority women

Background: Sexual minority women (SMW) are at greater risk for heavy episodic drinking, frequent marijuana use, and tobacco use than heterosexual women. Because past research has suggested the political and social environment may influence disparities in substance use by sexual orientation, this study examined associations of the U.S. state-level policy environment on substance use by SMW. Methods: A total of 732 SMW participants were recruited from two national online panels: a general population panel (n = 333) and a sexual minority-specific panel (n = 399). Past year substance use was defined by number of days of heavy episodic drinking (HED; 4+ drinks in a day), weekly tobacco use (once a week or more vs. less or none), and weekly marijuana use (once a week or more vs. less or none). Comprehensive state policy protection was defined by enactment of five policies protecting rights of sexual minorities. Regression models compared substance use outcomes for SMW living in states with comprehensive policy protections to SMW living in states with fewer or no protections. Models also assessed the impact of state policies related to alcohol (state monopoly on alcohol wholesale or retail sales), tobacco (state enactment of comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws) and marijuana (legalization of purchase, possession, or consumption of marijuana for recreational use). Results: Comprehensive policy protections were associated with fewer HED days. Recreational marijuana legalization was associated with higher odds of weekly use. Conclusions: Findings underscore the importance of policy protections for sexual minorities in reducing substance use, particularly HED, among SMW

The Influence of Multilevel Minority Stress on Hazardous Drinking Among Sexual Minority Women

Background: Sexual minority women (SMW; e.g., lesbian, bisexual women) are at substantially higher risk for hazardous drinking (HD) than their heterosexual, cisgender counterparts. There is considerable evidence that minority stressors at the individual (e.g., internalized stigma) and interpersonal (e.g., discrimination) levels are associated with HD among SMW, but minority stressors at the structural level (e.g., structural stigma) are understudied. Further, there is a wide gap in the literature on the relationships between multilevel minority stressors and HD. Additionally, there is evidence that these associations may differ by race/ethnicity and sexual identity, but relatively little is known about these differences, particularly in a multilevel context. Methods: This dissertation includes three studies that were guided by an adaptation of the minority stress model and the social ecological model. In the first study we conducted a systematic review of quantitative research studies that examined associations between structural stigma and alcohol-related outcomes among sexual and gender minority (SGM) adults in the United States. In the second study we used data from a diverse sample of SMW enrolled in the Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women (CHLEW) study to determine whether structural stigma at Wave 4 (2017-2019) was prospectively associated with HD at Wave 5 (2019-2022), and whether this association was attenuated when accounting for individual- (i.e., internalized stigma, stigma consciousness) and interpersonal- (i.e., discrimination, sexual identity concealment) level minority stressors. In the third study we used data from Waves 4 and 5 of the CHLEW study to examine whether associations between multilevel minority stressors (i.e., internalized stigma, stigma consciousness, discrimination, sexual identity concealment, structural stigma) and HD varied by race/ethnicity and sexual identity. Results: The systematic review included 11 studies. There was moderate to strong support for a positive association between structural stigma and poor alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people, with differences by gender, sexual identity, race, and ethnicity. All studies used cross-sectional designs, and nearly half utilized non-probability samples. Transgender and nonbinary people, SGM people of color, and sexual identity subgroups beyond gay, lesbian, and heterosexual were underrepresented. Multilevel stigma and resiliency factors were understudied. In the second study, structural stigma was positively associated with HD alone, and when combined with interpersonal-level minority stressors. With the addition of individual-level minority stressors, the association between structural stigma and HD was attenuated, with partial attenuation (i.e., structural stigma was still significant) in the model combining all three levels, and full attenuation (i.e., structural stigma was no longer significant) in the model with only structural stigma and individual-level stressors. Discrimination was negatively associated with HD in the fully combined model and was not associated with HD in any other models. In the third study, we found that associations between structural stigma and HD did not vary by race/ethnicity or sexual identity. However, the associations between individual-level minority stressors (i.e., internalized stigma, stigma consciousness) and interpersonal-level minority stressors (i.e., sexual identity concealment) with HD varied somewhat by race/ethnicity and sexual identity. Conclusions: Findings from this dissertation highlight the importance of structural stigma in SMW’s HD and underscore the importance of both structural-level and multilevel minority stressors in designing interventions to effectively address HD drinking disparities and inequities among SMW. Future research is needed using intersectional approaches with probability samples, longitudinal designs, expanded measures of structural stigma, and samples that reflect the diversity of SGM people

Structural stigma and alcohol use among sexual and gender minority adults: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people are more likely than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts to report negative alcohol-related outcomes. Although the association between individual- and interpersonal-level minority stressors and negative alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people is well-established, structural-level minority stressors are understudied. This systematic review examined structural-level stigma and alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people to inform future research, interventions, and policy. METHODS: We used five electronic databases to search for studies published between January 2010 and May 2022 that examined associations between structural stigma and alcohol use among SGM adults in the United States. Peer-reviewed, quantitative studies available in English were included. We conducted quality appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. RESULTS: The final sample included 11 studies. Overall, there was moderate to strong support for a positive association between structural stigma and negative alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people, with differences by gender, sexual identity, race, and ethnicity. All studies used cross-sectional designs, and nearly half utilized non-probability samples. Transgender and nonbinary people, SGM people of color, and sexual identity subgroups beyond gay, lesbian, and heterosexual were underrepresented. Structural stigma was most commonly measured as a state-level index. Alcohol measures were heterogeneous. Multilevel stigma and resiliency factors were understudied. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing structural stigma is critical in reducing negative alcohol-related outcomes and inequities among SGM people. Research is needed that includes probability samples, longitudinal designs, and samples that reflect the diversity of SGM people. Future studies should examine the influence of multilevel stigma and resiliency factors on alcohol-related outcomes

Structural stigma and alcohol use among sexual and gender minority adults: A systematic review

Background: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people are more likely than their cisgender, heterosexual counterparts to report negative alcohol-related outcomes. Although the association between individual- and interpersonal-level minority stressors and negative alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people is well-established, structural-level minority stressors are understudied. This systematic review examined structural-level stigma and alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people to inform future research, interventions, and policy. Methods: We used five electronic databases to search for studies published between January 2010 and May 2022 that examined associations between structural stigma and alcohol use among SGM adults in the United States. Peer-reviewed, quantitative studies available in English were included. We conducted quality appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Results: The final sample included 11 studies. Overall, there was moderate to strong support for a positive association between structural stigma and negative alcohol-related outcomes among SGM people, with differences by gender, sexual identity, race, and ethnicity. All studies used cross-sectional designs, and nearly half utilized non-probability samples. Transgender and nonbinary people, SGM people of color, and sexual identity subgroups beyond gay, lesbian, and heterosexual were underrepresented. Structural stigma was most commonly measured as a state-level index. Alcohol measures were heterogeneous. Multilevel stigma and resiliency factors were understudied. Conclusions: Addressing structural stigma is critical in reducing negative alcohol-related outcomes and inequities among SGM people. Research is needed that includes probability samples, longitudinal designs, and samples that reflect the diversity of SGM people. Future studies should examine the influence of multilevel stigma and resiliency factors on alcohol-related outcomes

sj-docx-1-tva-10.1177_15248380221122815 – Supplemental material for Intimate Partner Violence Among Sexual Minority Women: A Scoping Review

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tva-10.1177_15248380221122815 for Intimate Partner Violence Among Sexual Minority Women: A Scoping Review by Lauren M. Porsch, Mariah Xu, Cindy B. Veldhuis, Lauren A. Bochicchio, Sarah S. Zollweg and Tonda L. Hughes in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse</p