8,260 research outputs found

    On Reliability of Underwater Magnetic Induction Communications with Tri-Axis Coils

    Full text link
    Underwater magnetic induction communications (UWMICs) provide a low-power and high-throughput solution for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), which are envisioned to explore and monitor the underwater environment. UWMIC with tri-axis coils increases the reliability of the wireless channel by exploring the coil orientation diversity. However, the UWMIC channel is different from typical fading channels and the mutual inductance information (MII) is not always available. It is not clear the performance of the tri-axis coil MIMO without MII. Also, its performances with multiple users have not been investigated. In this paper, we analyze the reliability and multiplexing gain of UWMICs with tri-axis coils by using coil selection. We optimally select the transmit and receive coils to reduce the computation complexity and power consumption and explore the diversity for multiple users. We find that without using all the coils and MII, we can still achieve reliability. Also, the multiplexing gain of UWMIC without MII is 5dB smaller than typical terrestrial fading channels. The results of this paper provide a more power-efficient way to use UWMICs with tri-axis coils

    Study of the K1(1270)βˆ’K1(1400)K_1(1270)-K_1(1400) mixing in the decays Bβ†’J/Ξ¨K1(1270),J/Ξ¨K1(1400)B\to J/\Psi K_1(1270), J/\Psi K_1(1400)

    Full text link
    We studied the B meson decays Bβ†’J/Ξ¨K1(1270,1400)B\to J/\Psi K_1(1270,1400) in the pQCD approach beyond the leading order. With the vertex corrections and the NLO Wilson coefficients included, the branching ratios of the considered decays are Br(B+β†’J/Ξ¨K1(1270)+)=1.76βˆ’0.69+0.65Γ—10βˆ’3,Br(B+β†’J/Ξ¨K1(1400)+)=7.03βˆ’2.52+2.70Γ—10βˆ’4Br(B^+\to J/\Psi K_1(1270)^+)=1.76^{+0.65}_{-0.69}\times10^{-3}, Br(B^+\to J/\Psi K_1(1400)^+)=7.03^{+2.70}_{-2.52}\times10^{-4}, and Br(B0β†’J/Ξ¨K1(1270)0)=(1.63βˆ’0.64+0.60)Γ—10βˆ’3Br(B^0\to J/\Psi K_1(1270)^0)=(1.63^{+0.60}_{-0.64})\times10^{-3} with the mixing angle ΞΈK1=33∘\theta_{K_1}=33^\circ, which can agree well with the data or the present experimental upper limit within errors. So we support the opinion that ΞΈK1∼33∘\theta_{K_1}\sim33^\circ is much more favored than 58∘58^{\circ}. Furthermore, we also give the predictions for the polarization fractions, direct CP violations from the different polarization components, the relative phase angles for the considered decays with the mixing angle ΞΈK1=33∘\theta_{K_1}=33^\circ and 58∘58^\circ, respectively. The direct CP violations of the two charged decays B+β†’J/Ξ¨K1(1270,1400)+B^+\to J/\Psi K_1(1270,1400)^+ are very small (10βˆ’4∼10βˆ’5)(10^{-4}\sim10^{-5}), because there is no weak phase until up to O(Ξ»4)\mathcal{O}(\lambda^4) with the Wolfenstein parameter Ξ»=0.22537\lambda=0.22537. These results can be tested at the running LHCb and forthcoming Super-B experiments.Comment: 14 pages,3 figures,to appear in EPJ

    The analysis of the charmonium-like states Xβˆ—(3860)X^{*}(3860),X(3872)X(3872), X(3915)X(3915), X(3930)X(3930) and X(3940)X(3940) according to its strong decay behaviors

    Full text link
    Inspired by the newly observed state Xβˆ—(3860)X^{*}(3860), we analyze the strong decay behaviors of some charmonium-like states Xβˆ—(3860)X^{*}(3860),X(3872)X(3872), X(3915)X(3915), X(3930)X(3930) and X(3940)X(3940) by the 3P0^{3}P_{0} model. We carry out our work based on the hypothesis that these states are all being the charmonium systems. Our analysis indicates that 0++0^{++} charmonium state can be a good candidate for Xβˆ—(3860)X^{*}(3860) and 1++1^{++} state is the possible assignment for X(3872)X(3872). Considering as the 31S03^{1}S_{0} state, the decay behavior of X(3940)X(3940) is inconsistent with the experimental data. So, we can not assign X(3940)X(3940) as the 31S03^{1}S_{0} charmonium state by present work. Besides, our analysis imply that it is reasonable to assign X(3915)X(3915) and X(3930)X(3930) to be the same state, 2++2^{++}. However, combining our analysis with that of Zhou~\cite{ZhouZY}, we speculate that X(3915)X(3915)/X(3930)X(3930) might not be a pure ccβ€Ύc\overline{c} systems

    Strong coupling constants and radiative decays of the heavy tensor mesons

    Full text link
    In this article, we analyze tensor-vector-pseudoscalar(TVP) type of vertices D2βˆ—+D+ρD_{2}^{*+}D^{+}\rho, D2βˆ—0D0ρD_{2}^{*0}D^{0}\rho, D2βˆ—+D+Ο‰D_{2}^{*+}D^{+}\omega, D2βˆ—0D0Ο‰D_{2}^{*0}D^{0}\omega, B2βˆ—+B+ρB_{2}^{*+}B^{+}\rho, B2βˆ—0B0ρB_{2}^{*0}B^{0}\rho, B2βˆ—+B+Ο‰B_{2}^{*+}B^{+}\omega, B2βˆ—0B0Ο‰B_{2}^{*0}B^{0}\omega, Bs2βˆ—BsΟ•B_{s2}^{*}B_{s}\phi and Ds2βˆ—DsΟ•D_{s2}^{*}D_{s}\phi, in the frame work of three point QCD sum rules. According to these analysis, we calculate their strong form factors which are used to fit into analytical functions of Q2Q^{2}. Then, we obtain the strong coupling constants by extrapolating these strong form factors into deep time-like regions. As an application of this work, the coupling constants for radiative decays of these heavy tensor mesons are also calculated at the point of Q2=0Q^{2}=0. With these coupling constants, we finally calculate the radiative decay widths of these tensor mesons.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1810.0597

    Analysis of the strong vertices of Ξ£cNDβˆ—\Sigma_cND^{*} and Ξ£bNBβˆ—\Sigma_bNB^{*} in QCD sum rules

    Full text link
    The strong coupling constant is an important parameter which can help us to understand the strong decay behaviors of baryons. In our previous work, we have analyzed strong vertices Ξ£cβˆ—ND\Sigma_{c}^{*}ND, Ξ£bβˆ—NB\Sigma_{b}^{*}NB, Ξ£cND\Sigma_{c}ND, Ξ£bNB\Sigma_{b}NB in QCD sum rules. Following these work, we further analyze the strong vertices Ξ£cNDβˆ—\Sigma_{c}ND^{*} and Ξ£bNBβˆ—\Sigma_{b}NB^{*} using the three-point QCD sum rules under Dirac structures q ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/Ξ³Ξ±q\!\!\!/p\!\!\!/\gamma_{\alpha} and q ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/p ⁣ ⁣ ⁣/pΞ±q\!\!\!/p\!\!\!/p_{\alpha}. In this work, we first calculate strong form factors considering contributions of the perturbative part and the condensate terms ⟨qβ€Ύq⟩\langle\overline{q}q\rangle, ⟨αsΟ€GG⟩\langle\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\pi}GG\rangle and ⟨qβ€ΎgsΟƒGq⟩\langle\overline{q}g_{s}\sigma Gq\rangle. Then, these form factors are used to fit into analytical functions. According to these functions, we finally determine the values of the strong coupling constants for these two vertices Ξ£cNDβˆ—\Sigma_{c}ND^{*} and Ξ£bNBβˆ—\Sigma_{b}NB^{*}.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1705.0322

    Analysis of the strong coupling form factors of Ξ£bNB\Sigma_bNB and Ξ£cND\Sigma_c ND in QCD sum rules

    Full text link
    In this article, we study the strong interaction of the vertexes Ξ£bNB\Sigma_bNB and Ξ£cND\Sigma_c ND using the three-point QCD sum rules under two different dirac structures. Considering the contributions of the vacuum condensates up to dimension 55 in the operation product expansion, the form factors of these vertexes are calculated. Then, we fit the form factors into analytical functions and extrapolate them into time-like regions, which giving the coupling constant. Our analysis indicates that the coupling constant for these two vertexes are GΞ£bNB=0.43Β±0.01GeVβˆ’1G_{\Sigma_bNB}=0.43\pm0.01GeV^{-1} and GΞ£cND=3.76Β±0.05GeVβˆ’1G_{\Sigma_cND}=3.76\pm0.05GeV^{-1}.Comment: 6 figure
    • …
    corecore