Spin dynamics in triangular lattice antiferromagnets CuCr1−x_{1-x}Mgx_xO2_2

The electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy was employed to investigate the spin dynamics in triangular lattice antiferromagnets CuCr$_{1-x}$Mg$_{x}$O$_2$ with $x =$ 0 and 0.02. All spectra can be well fitted by a single Lorentzian lineshape. The analysis of the $g$ factor, the linewidth $\bigtriangleup H$, and the ESR intensity $I$ as a function of temperature suggests the development of significant antiferromagnetic (AFM) spin fluctuations at temperature well above $T_N$ in both samples. However, the evolution of the AFM spin fluctuations is different for each sample. For undoped sample the ESR intensity $I$ is almost temperature independent between $\sim$ 100 K and 50 K and then drops rapidly below 50 K. But for $x =$ 0.02, the $I$ monotonously increases with cooling and reduces rapidly only below $T_N$. These results indicate that the AFM spin fluctuations are extremely strong in the undoped sample and appear to be suppressed upon Mg doping.Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures. To be published in Europhysics Letter

An Agenda for Open Science in Communication

In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called “replication crisis” has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices