2 research outputs found
ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° (ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅)
Background. The intestinal microbiota, on the one hand, protects a person from pathogens, on the other hand, it itself may be one of the triggers and/or mediators of progression in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) predominantly affects young people of working age. It noted a steady increase in the incidence of IBD in recent decades throughout the world and in Russia. Inflammatory bowel diseases significantly affect quality of life and lead to complications of having to perform surgery, which significantly reduces the quality of life. Aims of the study was to investigate the composition of the microbiota of the colon, the search features of the microbial spectrum of patients with inflammatory bowel disease patients compared with control patients. Materials and methods. A prospective study was carried out between patients with inflammatory bowel disease and patients without inflammatory bowel disease for the period 20182019. The study included 157 IBD patients and 150 patients without IBD. All patients studied stool, which have been subjected to microbiological and metagenomic study. Results. Most often, facultative anaerobic microorganisms were present in the stool of patients with IBD (in 60%, 103109 CFU/g) and in patients without IBD (69%, 103109 CFU/g), the share of gram-negative bacteria accounted for 52%, in mostly represented by bacilli belonging to the order Enterobacteriales, only 7% of isolated gram-negative facultative aerobic microorganisms were gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria represented by 5 genera: Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Ralstonia. Gram-positive facultative anaerobic microorganisms in 89% were represented by cocci of the genus Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Gemella, Globicatella, Granulicatella. Conclusions. According to the results of our study, special attention should be paid to the presence of rare microaerophilic and obligate anaerobic microorganisms in the fecal microbiota of patients with IBD (Arcobacter butzleri, Gardnerella vaginalis, Aromatoleum aromaticum, Terrisporobacter glycolicus (Clostridium glycolicum), Solobacterium moorei, Alloscardovia omnicolens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Fusobacterium ulcerans, Dialister micraerophilus), that have not been isolated from patients without IBD. A timely adequate assessment of the composition and functional characteristics of the microbiota in terms of key biomarkers will make it possible to carry out targeted diagnostics and prevention of the immediate and long-term consequences of inflammatory bowel diseases.ΠΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ° ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°, Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ, Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ², Π° Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠΈΠ³Π³Π΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° (ΠΠΠ). ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°. ΠΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΠΠ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΠ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ, Π° ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ², ΡΡΠΎ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅, Π±Π΅Π· Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π·Π° 20182019 Π³Π³. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ 157 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΠΠ ΠΈ 150 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠ. Π£ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ»Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅ΡΠ³Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΠΠ (Π² 60% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ 103109 ΠΠΠ/Π³) ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠ (69% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ 103109 ΠΠΠ/Π³) ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ, ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΠ»Ρ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ 52% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π², Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π±Π°ΡΠΈΠ»Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΊΡ Enterobacteriales, ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ 7% ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π³Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ (ΠΠΠΠ€Π), ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ: Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Ralstonia. ΠΡΠ°ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ Π² 89% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Gemella, Globicatella, Granulicatella. ΠΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΠΠ ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Arcobacter butzleri, Gardnerella vaginalis, Aromatoleum aromaticum, Terrisporobacter glycolicus (Clostridium glycolicum), Solobacterium moorei, Alloscardovia omnicolens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Fusobacterium ulcerans ΠΈ Dialister micraerophilus, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π±Π΅Π· ΠΠΠ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ Π±Π»ΠΈΠΆΠ°ΠΉΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°
The creation of a virtual museum contributes to the providing the most effective diagnosis of parasitosis
Conduction. The recognition diagnosis of helminths and protozoa invasion is one of the current and almost unresolved problems in modern parasitology. For the present, the lack of a standardized museum of parasitic pathogens in Russia and abroad complicates a parasitologist's already hard work. The population urbanization, increased anthropogenic pressure, climate change, and natural disasters lead to the occurrence of favorable conditions for the development, long-Term survival, and spread of pathogens of parasitic diseases in various environmental objects. The deterioration of the population socio-economic conditions, the emergence of interethnic conflicts in the world led to large-scale migration flows from countries near and far abroad to Russia, which led to an increase in pathogens circulating in the territory of the Russian Federation. The aim of our research was to improve the methodological support and create virtual slides with the image of larvae and eggs of helminths, as well as cysts and oocysts of pathogenic protozoa recorded on the territory of the Russian Federation based on digital scanner microscopes. Material and methods. The authors used scanner microscopes with the software module "Parasitology." Results. An up-To-date register of photo images of more than 40 species of parasitic pathogens of medical significance and 53 species of pathogens of parasitic diseases of animals that pose a danger to human life has been delivered. Discussion. The authors are always working on improving the technical characteristics of digital analyzers. Conclusion. Updating the atlas, creating a new advanced gallery of helminth eggs, larvae, cysts, and oocysts of pathogenic protozoa will significantly increase parasitological studies' effectiveness in sanitation and the analysis of intestinal microbiota. Β© 2021 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved