Developing interactions with industry in rare diseases: lessons learned and continuing challenges.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network to address the unique challenges of performing research on rare diseases. The Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) was one of the original ten consortia established. The UCDC represents a unique partnership among clinicians, patients, and the NIH with a primary goal of increasing the development of therapeutics that improve patient outcomes for persons affected with a UCD. Based in part on financial incentives associated with the Orphan Drug Act biopharmaceutical and investment entities have an intense interest in engaging with research consortia like the UCDC, which have compiled potentially valuable longitudinal data characterizing outcomes in a relatively large number of affected individuals. We describe the UCDC experience and the bases for evaluating partnerships with such private entities. We review early industry interactions, the development of policies and procedures, and describe the establishment of an Industry Relations Committee, including guiding principles. Challenges encountered, particularly in the transition when products are approved, and potential solutions are discussed. By building a framework for industry partnerships that guides us in resolving inevitable challenges, we can enthusiastically pursue novel and promising collaborations that can lead to breakthroughs in therapeutic interventions for patients

Establishing a consortium for the study of rare diseases: The Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium

The Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (UCDC) was created as part of a larger network established by the National Institutes of Health to study rare diseases. This paper reviews the UCDC's accomplishments over the first 6years, including how the Consortium was developed and organized, clinical research studies initiated, and the importance of creating partnerships with patient advocacy groups, philanthropic foundations and biotech and pharmaceutical companies

Transatlantic combined and comparative data analysis of 1095 patients with urea cycle disorders—A successful strategy for clinical research of rare diseases

Background: To improve our understanding of urea cycle disorders (UCDs) prospectively followed by two North American (NA) and European (EU) patient cohorts. Aims: Description of the NA and EU patient samples and investigation of the prospects of combined and comparative analyses for individuals with UCDs. Methods: Retrieval and comparison of the data from 1095 individuals (NA: 620, EU: 475) from two electronic databases. Results: The proportion of females with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (fOTC-D), particularly those being asymptomatic (asfOTC-D), was higher in the NA than in the EU sample. Exclusion of asfOTC-D resulted in similar distributions in both samples. The mean age at first symptoms was higher in NA than in EU patients with late onset (LO), but similar for those with early (≤ 28 days) onset (EO) of symptoms. Also, the mean age at diagnosis and diagnostic delay for EO and LO patients were similar in the NA and EU cohorts. In most patients (including fOTC-D), diagnosis was made after the onset of symptoms (59.9%) or by high-risk family screening (24.7%), and less often by newborn screening (8.9%) and prenatal testing (3.7%). Analysis of clinical phenotypes revealed that EO patients presented with more symptoms than LO individuals, but that numbers of symptoms correlated with plasma ammonium concentrations in EO patients only. Liver transplantation was reported for 90 NA and 25 EU patients. Conclusions: Combined analysis of databases drawn from distinct populations opens the possibility to increase sample sizes for natural history questions, while comparative analysis utilizing differences in approach to treatment can evaluate therapeutic options and enhance long-term outcome studies

Transatlantic combined and comparative data analysis of 1095 patients with urea cycle disorders—A successful strategy for clinical research of rare diseases

BACKGROUND:To improve our understanding of urea cycle disorders (UCDs) prospectively followed by two North American (NA) and European (EU) patient cohorts. AIMS:Description of the NA and EU patient samples and investigation of the prospects of combined and comparative analyses for individuals with UCDs. METHODS:Retrieval and comparison of the data from 1095 individuals (NA: 620, EU: 475) from two electronic databases. RESULTS:The proportion of females with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (fOTC-D), particularly those being asymptomatic (asfOTC-D), was higher in the NA than in the EU sample. Exclusion of asfOTC-D resulted in similar distributions in both samples. The mean age at first symptoms was higher in NA than in EU patients with late onset (LO), but similar for those with early (≤ 28 days) onset (EO) of symptoms. Also, the mean age at diagnosis and diagnostic delay for EO and LO patients were similar in the NA and EU cohorts. In most patients (including fOTC-D), diagnosis was made after the onset of symptoms (59.9%) or by high-risk family screening (24.7%), and less often by newborn screening (8.9%) and prenatal testing (3.7%). Analysis of clinical phenotypes revealed that EO patients presented with more symptoms than LO individuals, but that numbers of symptoms correlated with plasma ammonium concentrations in EO patients only. Liver transplantation was reported for 90 NA and 25 EU patients. CONCLUSIONS:Combined analysis of databases drawn from distinct populations opens the possibility to increase sample sizes for natural history questions, while comparative analysis utilizing differences in approach to treatment can evaluate therapeutic options and enhance long-term outcome studies

Transatlantic combined and comparative data analysis of 1095 patients with urea cycle disorders—a successful strategy for clinical research of rare diseases

Background: To improve our understanding of urea cycle disorders (UCDs) prospectively followed by two North American (NA) and European (EU) patient cohorts. Aims: Description of the NA and EU patient samples and investigation of the prospects of combined and comparative analyses for individuals with UCDs. Methods: Retrieval and comparison of the data from 1095 individuals (NA: 620, EU: 475) from two electronic databases. Results: The proportion of females with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (fOTC-D), particularly those being asymptomatic (asfOTC-D), was higher in the NA than in the EU sample. Exclusion of asfOTC-D resulted in similar distributions in both samples. The mean age at first symptoms was higher in NA than in EU patients with late onset (LO), but similar for those with early (≤ 28 days) onset (EO) of symptoms. Also, the mean age at diagnosis and diagnostic delay for EO and LO patients were similar in the NA and EU cohorts. In most patients (including fOTC-D), diagnosis was made after the onset of symptoms (59.9%) or by high-risk family screening (24.7%), and less often by newborn screening (8.9%) and prenatal testing (3.7%). Analysis of clinical phenotypes revealed that EO patients presented with more symptoms than LO individuals, but that numbers of symptoms correlated with plasma ammonium concentrations in EO patients only. Liver transplantation was reported for 90 NA and 25 EU patients. Conclusions: Combined analysis of databases drawn from distinct populations opens the possibility to increase sample sizes for natural history questions, while comparative analysis utilising differences in approach to treatment can evaluate therapeutic options and enhance long-term outcome studies