83 research outputs found
The Chandra X-Ray Observatory's Radiation Environment and the AP-8/AE-8 Model
The Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO) was launched on July 23, 1999 and reached
its final orbit on August 7, 1999. The CXO is in a highly elliptical orbit,
approximately 140,000 km x 10,000 km, and has a period of approximately 63.5
hours (~ 2.65 days). It transits the Earth's Van Allen belts once per orbit
during which no science observations can be performed due to the high radiation
environment. The Chandra X-ray Observatory Center (CXC) currently uses the
National Space Science Data Center's ``near Earth'' AP-8/AE-8 radiation belt
model to predict the start and end times of passage through the radiation
belts. However, our scheduling software uses only a simple dipole model of the
Earth's magnetic field. The resulting B, L magnetic coordinates, do not always
give sufficiently accurate predictions of the start and end times of transit of
the Van Allen belts. We show this by comparing to the data from Chandra's
on-board radiation monitor, the EPHIN (Electron, Proton, Helium Instrument
particle detector) instrument. We present evidence that demonstrates this
mis-timing of the outer electron radiation belt as well as data that also
demonstrate the significant variablity of one radiation belt transit to the
next as experienced by the CXO. We also present an explanation for why the
dipole implementation of the AP-8/AE-8 model is not ideally suited for the CXO.
Lastly, we provide a brief discussion of our on-going efforts to identify a
model that accounts for radiation belt variability, geometry, and one that can
be used for observation scheduling purposes.Comment: 12 pgs, 6 figs, for SPIE 4012 (Paper 76
Cosmic Ray Accelerators in the Large Magellanic Cloud
I point out a correlation between gamma-ray emissivity and the historical
star formation rate in the Large Magellanic Cloud ~12.5 Myr ago. This
correlation bolsters the view that CRs in the LMC are accelerated by
conglomerations of supernova remnants: i.e. superbubbles and supergiant shells.Comment: Research Not
Supernova remnants and gamma-ray sources
A review of the possible relationship between gamma-ray sources and supernova
remnants (SNRs) is presented. Particular emphasis is given to the analysis of
the observational status of the problem of cosmic ray acceleration at SNR shock
fronts. All positional coincidences between SNRs and unidentified gamma-ray
sources listed in the Third EGRET Catalog at low Galactic latitudes are
discussed on a case by case basis. For several coincidences of particular
interest, new CO(J=1-0) and radio continuum maps are shown, and the mass
content of the SNR surroundings is determined. The contribution to the
gamma-ray flux observed that might come from cosmic ray particles (particularly
nuclei) locally accelerated at the SNR shock fronts is evaluated. We discuss
the prospects for future research in this field and remark on the possibilities
for observations with forthcoming gamma-ray instruments.Comment: Final version of a review article, to appear in the Physics Reports
(82 pages, 31 figures). Figures requiring high quality are just too large and
too many to be included here. Please download them from
http://www.angelfire.com/id/dtorres/down3.htm
A Cosmic Ray Resolution to the Superbubble Energy-Crisis
Superbubbles (SBs) are amongst the greatest injectors of energy into the
Galaxy, and have been proposed to be the acceleration site of Galactic cosmic
rays. They are thought to be powered by the fast stellar winds and powerful
supernova explosions of massive stars in dense stellar clusters and
associations. Observations of the SB 'DEM L192' in the neighboring Large
Magellenic Cloud (LMC) galaxy show that it contains only about one-third the
energy injected by its constituent stars via fast stellar winds and supernovae.
It is not yet understood where the excess energy is going, thus, the so-called
'energy crisis'. We show here that it is very likely that a significant
fraction of the unaccounted for energy is being taken up in accelerating cosmic
rays, thus bolstering the argument for the SB origin of cosmic rays.Comment: Accepted for publication in ApJ
- …