Effect of the SGLT2 Inhibitor Dapagliflozin on Potassium Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia risk is increased in diabetes, particularly in patients with renal impairment or those receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or potassium-sparing diuretics. Conversely, other diuretics can increase hypokalemia risk. We assessed the effects of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on serum potassium levels in a pooled analysis of clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Fourteen randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind T2DM studies were analyzed: pooled data from 13 studies of ≤24 weeks’ duration (dapagliflozin 10 mg, N = 2360; placebo, N = 2295); and one 52-week moderate renal impairment study in patients with baseline eGFR ≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (dapagliflozin 10 mg, N = 85; placebo, N = 84). Central laboratory serum potassium levels were determined at each study visit. RESULTS: No clinically relevant mean changes from baseline in serum potassium ≤24 weeks were reported for dapagliflozin 10 mg [−0.05 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.07, −0.03] versus placebo (−0.02 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.04, 0.00) in the pooled population or in the renal impairment study (−0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.14, 0.08 vs. −0.02 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.13, 0.09, respectively). The incidence rate ratio for serum potassium ≥5.5 mmol/L over 24 weeks for dapagliflozin 10 mg versus placebo was 0.90 (95% CI 0.74, 1.10) in the pooled population; with no increased risk in patients receiving ARBs/ACE inhibitors, or potassium-sparing diuretics, or in those with moderate renal impairment. Slightly more patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg had serum potassium ≤3.5 mmol/L versus placebo (5.2% vs. 3.6%); however, no instances of serum potassium ≤2.5 mmol/L were reported. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin is not associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia or severe hypokalemia in patients with T2DM. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0150-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Associations of Angiopoietin 2 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Concentrations with Clinical End Points

BACKGROUND: Angiopoietin 2 regulates endothelial function partially mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and may play a role in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We assessed the association of angiopoietin 2 and VEGF-A with cardiorenal outcomes and investigated the effect of canagliflozin on angiopoietin 2 and VEGF-A concentrations. METHODS: Two thousand five hundred sixty-five study participants with DKD and available plasma samples treated with canagliflozin or placebo in the Canagliflozin and Kidney Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial were included. Angiopoietin 2 and VEGF-A concentrations were measured at baseline, year 1, and year 3. The primary composite end point of the trial was a composite of kidney failure, doubling of the serum creatinine level, and kidney or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Patients with the highest baseline quartile of angiopoietin 2, but not VEGF-A, concentration had the highest risk clinical profile. Treatment with canagliflozin significantly lowered concentrations of angiopoietin 2 (adjusted geometric mean ratio: 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 0.95; P &lt; 0.001), but not VEGF-A. In multivariable-adjusted modeling, each 50% increment in log baseline angiopoietin 2 concentrations was associated with a higher risk of primary composite outcome (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.43). Angiopoietin 2 change at year 1 compared with baseline explained 10% of the effect of canagliflozin on the primary composite outcome. VEGF-A concentrations were not associated with outcomes, alone or in combination with angiopoietin 2.CONCLUSIONS: Higher angiopoietin 2 levels were associated with cardiorenal risk among individuals with DKD independent of VEGF-A. Canagliflozin lowered angiopoietin 2 concentrations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Diabetic Nephropathy, NCT02065791 .</p

Canagliflozin Reduces Kidney-Related Adverse Events in Type 2 Diabetes and CKD:Findings From the Randomized CREDENCE Trial

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Canagliflozin reduced the risk of kidney failure and related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the CREDENCE trial. This analysis of CREDENCE trial data examines the effect of canagliflozin on the incidence of kidney-related adverse events (AEs). STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 4,401 trial participants with T2DM, CKD, and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio >300-5000mg/g. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive canagliflozin 100mg/day or placebo. OUTCOMES: Rates of kidney-related AEs were analyzed using an on-treatment approach, overall and by screening estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) strata (30-<45, 45-<60, and 60-<90 mL/min/1.73m2). RESULTS: Canagliflozin was associated with a reduction in the overall incidence rate of kidney-related AEs (60.2 vs 84.0 per 1,000 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 0.82]; P<0.001), with consistent results for serious kidney-related AEs (HR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.51, 1.00]; P=0.05) and acute kidney injury (AKI; HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.64, 1.13]; P=0.3). The rates of kidney-related AEs were lower with canagliflozin relative to placebo across the 3 eGFR strata (HRs of 0.73, 0.60, and 0.81 for eGFR 30-<45, 45-<60, and 60-<90 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively; P-interaction=0.3), with similar results for AKI (P-interaction=0.9). Full recovery of kidney function within 30 days after an AKI event occurred more frequently with canagliflozin versus placebo (53.1% vs 35.4%; odds ratio: 2.2 [95% CI: 1.0, 4.7]; P=0.04). LIMITATIONS: Kidney-related AEs including AKI were investigator-reported and collected without central adjudication. Biomarkers of AKI and structural tubular damage were not measured and creatinine data after an AKI event were not available for all participants. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin compared to placebo was associated with a reduced incidence of serious and non-serious kidney-related AEs in patients with T2DM and CKD. These results highlight the safety of canagliflozin with regard to adverse kidney disease events

Insulin growth factor axis and cardio-renal risk in diabetic kidney disease: an analysis from the CREDENCE trial

Background: The insulin-like growth factors (IGF) play a crucial role in regulating cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and key metabolic pathways. The ratio of IGF-1 to IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) is an important factor in determining IGF-1 bioactivity. We sought to investigate the association of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 with cardio-renal outcomes among persons with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Samples were available from 2627 individuals with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease that were randomized to receive canagliflozin or placebo and were followed up for incident cardio-renal events. Primary outcome was defined as a composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal/cardiovascular death. IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were measured at baseline, Year-1 and Year-3. Elevated IGF-1 level was defined according to age-specific cutoffs. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to investigate the association between IGF-1 level, IGFBP-3, and the ratio of IGF-1/IGFBP-3 with clinical outcomes. Results: Elevated IGF-1 was associated with lower glomerular filtration rate at baseline. Treatment with canagliflozin did not significantly change IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations by 3 years (p-value &gt; 0.05). In multivariable models, elevated IGF-1 (above vs below age-specific cutoffs) was associated with the primary composite outcome (incidence rate:17.8% vs. 12.7% with a hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52; 95% confidence interval CI 1.09–2.13;P: 0.01), renal composite outcome (HR: 1.65; 95% CI 1.14–2.41; P: 0.01), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.52; 95% CI 1.00–2.32; P; 0.05). Elevations in log IGFBP-3 did not associate with any clinical outcomes. Increase in log IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio was also associated with a higher risk of the primary composite outcome (HR per unit increase: 1.57; 95% CI 1.09–2.26; P; 0.01). Conclusions: These results further suggest potential importance of IGF biology in the risk for cardio-renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes. SGLT2 inhibition has no impact on the biology of IGF despite its significant influence on outcomes. Trial registration: CREDENCE; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02065791

Atmospheric deposition of TiO2 films on glass substrates for antibacterial activity

BACKGROUND: Canagliflozin reduces the risk of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, but effects on specific cardiovascular outcomes are uncertain, as are effects in people without prior cardiovascular disease (primary prevention). METHODS: In CREDENCE, 4401 participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease were randomly assigned to canagliflozin or placebo on a background of optimized standard of care. RESULTS: Primary prevention participants (N=2181; 49.6%) were younger (61 vs 65 years), more often female (37% vs 31%), and had shorter diabetes duration (15 vs 16 years) compared to secondary prevention participants (N=2220; 50.4%). Canagliflozin reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.95; P=0.01), with consistent reductions in both the primary (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94) and secondary (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69-1.06) prevention groups (P-interaction 0.25). Effects were also similar for the components of the composite including cardiovascular death (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-1.00), nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.10), and nonfatal stroke (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15). The risk of the primary composite renal outcome and the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure were also consistently reduced in both the primary and secondary prevention groups (P-interaction >0.5 for each outcome). CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin significantly reduced major cardiovascular events, as well as kidney failure, in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, including in participants who did not have prior cardiovascular disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT02065791

Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to 300 to 5000) and were treated with renin–angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P=0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P=0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years

Long-Term Safety of Dapagliflozin in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of Phase IIb/III Studies

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 104-week safety of dapagliflozin in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Pooled analysis assessing general safety (nine phase III studies ≤104 weeks) and cardiovascular safety (21 phase IIb/III studies ≤208 weeks) by age (<65; ≥65; ≥75 years). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (±background glucose-lowering therapy) received: dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 2026) vs. placebo (n = 1956) (nine-study pool); or dapagliflozin (2.5–50 mg; n = 5936) vs. control (placebo/comparator) (n = 3403) (21-study pool). RESULTS: Adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations owing to AEs were more common in older vs. younger patients, and were more frequent with dapagliflozin than placebo (AEs: <65 years: 73.1 vs. 70.7 %; ≥65 years: 77.4 vs. 73.1 %; ≥75 years: 80.4 vs. 75.3 %, respectively; discontinuations: <65 years: 5.9 vs. 5.0 %; ≥65 years: 14.4 vs. 12.2 %; ≥75 years: 26.8 vs. 22.1 %, respectively); serious AE (SAE) frequency was similar (<65 years: 11.0 vs. 11.8 %; ≥65 years: 20.0 vs. 20.2 %; ≥75 years: 19.6 vs. 18.2 %, respectively). Hypoglycaemia frequency was similar across age groups and was higher with dapagliflozin than placebo (<65 years: 18.0 vs. 13.4 %; ≥65 years: 20.2 vs. 17.7 %; ≥75 years: 17.5 vs. 16.9 %, respectively); major episodes were rare. Urinary tract infection frequency was similar between treatment groups in older patients, with no increase vs. younger patients (<65 years: 8.8 vs. 5.5 %; ≥65 years: 8.1 vs. 7.6 %; ≥75 years: 8.2 vs. 9.1 %, respectively); urinary tract infection SAEs were rare. Genital infection AEs were more common with dapagliflozin, with no increase in older patients (<65 years: 8.2 vs. 1.0 %; ≥65 years: 6.6 vs. 0.9 %; ≥75 years: 7.2 vs. 0.0 %, respectively) and no SAEs. Volume reduction AEs were uncommon, with a higher frequency with dapagliflozin vs. placebo and in patients ≥75 years (<65 years: 1.7 vs. 1.2 %; ≥65 years: 2.3 vs. 1.7 %; ≥75 years: 3.1 vs. 2.6 %, respectively). Dapagliflozin did not increase the risk of fractures (<65 years: 1.1 vs. 1.1 %; ≥65 years: 1.1 vs. 2.7 %; ≥75 years: 1.0 vs. 2.6 %, respectively) or falls (<65 years: 0.7 vs. 0.7 %; ≥65 years: 0.6 vs. 2.1 %; ≥75 years: 0.0 vs. 1.3 %, respectively), regardless of age. AEs of renal function were more common with dapagliflozin than placebo and increased with age (<65 years: 3.5 vs. 2.3 %; ≥65 years: 14.0 vs. 7.9 %; ≥75 years: 29.9 vs. 20.8 %, respectively). Most were non-serious small transient increases in serum creatinine. Dapagliflozin did not increase cardiovascular risk regardless of age [hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval) vs. control: <65 years: 0.726 (0.473, 1.114); ≥65 years: 0.879 (0.565, 1.366); ≥75 years: 0.950 (0.345, 2.617), respectively]. CONCLUSION: Dapagliflozin treatment up to 104 weeks was well tolerated in older patients. Older dapagliflozin-treated patients had more renal AEs than placebo-treated patients; the majority of which were non-serious small transient changes in serum creatinine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-016-0382-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users

Extremes of both weight gain and weight loss are associated with increased incidence of heart failure and cardiovascular death: evidence from the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE

Abstract Background Obesity is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, it is not known to what extent weight fluctuations might be associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed at assessing the associations between extreme weight changes and cardiovascular outcomes in two large randomised controlled trials of canagliflozin in patients with T2D and high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Methods In the study populations of the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trials, weight change was evaluated between randomization and week 52–78, defining subjects in the top 10% of the entire distribution of weight changes as gainers, subjects in the bottom 10% as losers and the remainder as stable. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the associations between weight changes categories, randomised treatment and covariates with heart failure hospitalisation (hHF) and the composite of hHF and CV death. Results Median weight gain was 4.5 kg in gainers and median weight loss was 8.5 kg in losers. The clinical phenotype of gainers as well as that of losers were similar to that of stable subjects. Weight change within each category was only slightly larger with canagliflozin than placebo. In both trials, gainers and losers had a higher risk of hHF and of hHF/CV death compared with stable at univariate analysis. In CANVAS, this association was still significant by multivariate analysis for hHF/CV death in both gainers and losers vs. stable (hazard ratio – HR 1.61 [95% confidence interval - CI: 1.20–2.16] and 1.53 [95% CI 1.14–2.03] respectively). Results were similar in CREDENCE for gainers vs. stable (adjusted HR for hHF/CV death 1.62 [95% CI 1.19–2.16]) Conclusions Extremes of weight gain or loss were independently associated with a higher risk of the composite of hHF and CV death. In patients with T2D and high CV risk, large changes in body weight should be carefully assessed in view of individualised management. Trials registration CANVAS ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01032629. CREDENCE ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT0206579