Doubly Charged Higgs Production at Future epep Colliders

The Higgs sector of the standard model can be extended by introducing an $SU(2)_L$ Higgs triplet $\Delta$ to generate the tiny neutrino masses in the framework of type-II seesaw mechanism. In this paper, we study the pair production of the introduced Higgs triplet at future $e^{-}p$ colliders. The corresponding production cross sections via vector boson fusion process at FCC-ep and ILC$\otimes$FCC are predicted, where the production of a pair of doubly charged Higgs is found to be dominant and then used to investigate the collider phenomenology of the Higgs triplet. Depending on the size of the Higgs triplet vacuum expectation value, the doubly charged Higgs may decay into a pair of same-sign charged leptons or a pair of same-sign $W$ bosons. In order to explore the discovery potential of the doubly charged Higgs at future $e^{-}p$ colliders, we discuss these two decay scenarios in detail and show respectively the detection sensitivity on the mass of the doubly charged Higgs.Comment: 21 pages, 9 figure

The next-to-next-to-leading order soft function for top quark pair production

We present the first calculation of the next-to-next-to-leading order threshold soft function for top quark pair production at hadron colliders, with full velocity dependence of the massive top quarks. Our results are fully analytic, and can be entirely written in terms of generalized polylogarithms. The scale-dependence of our result coincides with the well-known two-loop anomalous dimension matrix including the three-parton correlations, which at the two-loop order only appear when more than one massive partons are involved in the scattering process. In the boosted limit, our result exhibits the expected factorization property of mass logarithms, which leads to a consistent extraction of the soft fragmentation function. The next-to-next-to-leading order soft function obtained in this paper is an important ingredient for threshold resummation at the next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy.Comment: 34 pages, 9 figures; v2: added references, matches the published versio

VcbV_{cb} from the semileptonic decay B→DℓνˉℓB\to D \ell \bar{\nu}_{\ell} and the properties of the DD meson distribution amplitude

The improved QCD light-cone sum rule (LCSR) provides an effective way to deal with the heavy-to-light transition form factors (TFFs). Firstly, we adopt the improved LCSR approach to deal with the $B\to D$ TFF $f^{+}(q^2)$ up to twist-4 accuracy. Due to the elimination of the most uncertain twist-3 contribution and the large suppression of the twist-4 contribution, the obtained LCSR shall provide us a good platform for testing the $D$-meson leading-twist DA. For the purpose, we suggest a new model for the $D$-meson leading-twist DA ($\phi_{3D}$), whose longitudinal behavior is dominantly determined by a parameter $B$. Moreover, we find its second Gegenbauer moment $a^D_2\sim B$. Varying $B$ within certain region, one can conveniently mimic the $D$-meson DA behavior suggested in the literature. Inversely, by comparing the estimations with the experimental data on the $D$-meson involved processes, one can get a possible range for the parameter $B$ and a determined behavior for the $D$-meson DA. Secondly, we discuss the $B\to D$ TFF at the maximum recoil region and present a detailed comparison of it with the pQCD estimation and the experimental measurements. Thirdly, by applying the LCSR on $f^{+}(q^2)$, we study the CKM matrix element \Vcb together with its uncertainties by adopting two types of processes, i.e. the $B^0/\bar{B}^0$-type and the $B^{\pm}$-type. It is noted that a smaller $B \precsim 0.20$ shows a better agreement with the experimental value on \Vcb. For example, for the case of $B=0.00$, we obtain $|V_{cb}|(B^0/\bar{B}^0-{\rm type})=(41.28 {^{+5.68}_{-4.82}} {^{+1.13}_{-1.16}}) \times 10^{-3}$ and $|V_{cb}|(B^{\pm}-{\rm type})=(40.44 {^{+5.56}_{-4.72}} {^{+0.98}_{-1.00}}) \times 10^{-3}$, whose first (second) uncertainty comes from the squared average of the mentioned theoretical (experimental) uncertainties.Comment: 13 pages, 10 figures. Reference updated and discussion improved. To be published in Nucl.Phys.